Title: True Grid
1True Grid
- Barry Smith
- http//ontology.buffalo.edu/smith
2Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
author of Della pittura (1435-36) the first
scientific manual of painting
and simultaneously a contribution to the
ontology of visual representation
3Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
Albertis grid
4Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
The goal of the artist is to produce a picture
that will represent the visible world as if the
observer of the picture were looking through a
window
5Dürer
Underweysung der Messung (1525)
the problem of measuring the surfaces of reality
6Panofsky
- one can properly speak of a perspectival
intuition of space only where - a whole picture is as it were transformed into a
window through which we should then believe
ourselves to be looking into the space
7true or correct perspective
what is captured on a plane intersecting the
visual pyramid
8true or correct perspective
what is captured by a transparent grid
9Practical problem of perspective
- solved by Brunelleschi in 1425
- with a painting of the Baptistery of St. John in
Florence
10Baptistery
11Brunelleschis Peepshow
12Theoretical problem of perspective
solved by Alberti in Book 1of Della pittura The
solution, captured in the diagram of the
reticolato, belongs to projective geometry
13How did Alberti solve the theoretical problem of
linear perspective ?
14And why did mankind have to wait 1700 after
Euclids Geometry and Optics for this solution?
15The answer belongs to the history of cartography
16Ptolemys Geographia (c. 140 A.D.)
- uses a regular mathematical grid system to map
the entire known world
17Ptolemaic World Maps
18Ptolemys Regional World Divisions
19Example of a Pre-Ptolemaic Map
20Ptolemys grid system
- transformed the relationship between astronomy
and sublunar physics - ... this made the world below for the first time
susceptible to uniform mathematical treatment
21The Rediscovery of Ptolemys Geographia
- Greek text arrived in Florence from
Constantinople in 1400
22Florence by 1424 a center of cartographic and
geographic study
- commentaries on Florentine versions of the
Geographia influenced Columbus
23Uccello Gridded Challice c. 1450
24Ptolemys grid system
- not just mathematical regularity
- also transparency
- ... the grid helps us to see the world aright
25Grids of Reality (Mercator 1569)
26Alberti extended Ptolemys method to pictures
- Alberti the veil affords the greatest
assistance in executing your pictures, - since you can see any object that is round and
in relief, represented on the flat surface of the
veil.
27Giotto
28Ideal City
(Grid)
29School of Athens
30Albertis Ontology of Painting
- 1. The grid of the reticolato and the grid of
the objective reality beyond are linked together
by a projective relation - 2. The grid effects a selection, from the
totality of surfaces in objective reality, of
those parts which will be foregrounded in the
painting
31the result of this selection is perfectly
objective
- compare what happens on the stage in the theater
- selection does not imply distortion
32Degens Law
- If a well-formed diagram is transparent to
reality, then so are all its well-formed parts
From
33we can validly infer
34Mereological fallacies
- Inferring that a part is the whole
- Concluding, given a true representation, that
truth implies completeness
35Algebra
- Algebraic ontologists are correct the world
contains processes - they err only when they add and nothing else
- Field ontologists are correct the world
contains fields - they err only when they add and nothing else
36Selection implies distortion
- only if the mistake is made of assuming that the
selected part is identical with the whole
37The world contains fields
- Evidence this assumption supports successful
predictions - ? The world contains only fields and nothing
else - This conclusion rests on a mereological fallacy
(and also on a mistaken understanding of the role
of granularity)
38How to Tell the Truth with Maps
- There are maps of different scales
- There are transparent grids of different
granularities
39How to Tell the Truth with Maps
- Albertis reticolato casts its transparent net
over the array of planes out there in objective
reality in such a way as to cast into relief a
visual scene. - A good map casts its transparent net over
reality in such a way as to cast into relief a
certain portion of the surface of the earth
40Some nets are regular
41Some nets are irregular
42Some nets are many-sorted
43 containing labeled and non-labeledcells formed
by
- linear and non-linear icons
- icons representing spatial regions
-
44Most maps contain two grids of cells
- projecting simultaneously onto the same
underlying reality
45The analogy between maps and pictures
- has nothing to do with perspective
- but rather with the highly general concept of a
transparent grid and with an associated highly
general notion of projection - But how are we to understand this notion of
projection?
46Problem
- How many cells does this map contain?
47Is the Western half of Wyoming represented on
this map?
48Is the central square mile of Wyoming represented
on this map?
49Is the capital of Wyoming represented on this map?
50Is the Texas panhandle represented on this map?
51Is Hot Springs County represented on this map?
52Are the molecules of Wyoming represented on this
map?
53Optical Projection
54Cartographic Projection
55Projection is involved wherever there is
intentionality
56intentionality the directedness towards objects
of a mental act
57The theory of transparent grids can help us to
understand how intentional directedness works
selection, foregrounding, labeling, classification
58Intentional directedness
- is effected in every case via something like
an Albertian grid a cognitive artifact which we
shall call a granular partition - we can reach out to objects because partitions
are transparent
59and such partitions
- are always granular
- when we perceive a frog we do not perceive the
molecules in the frogs skin - when we think about Mary, we do not think about
the molecules in Marys nose
60Vagueness comes to awareness
- through ontological zooming (from coarse-grained
to fine-grained partitions)
61This granularity of our partitions
- explains also (how we are able to cope with) the
phenomenon of vagueness - when we think about Mary, we do not think about
the molecules in Marys nose - when we think about Mount Everest, we do not
think about where, precisely, the mountain begins
or ends in its foothills
62Foreground/Background
granular partitions are involved wherever there
is a division of reality into foreground and
background
63That granular partitions have multiple cells
corresponds to the fact that intentionality can
be many-rayed
- people
- my three sons
- Benelux
- the Germans
- COSIT participants
64Counting
counting involves
many-rayed intentionality
plus granularity
65Granular partitions
- are involved in simple acts of naming,
classifying, seeing, recognizing, mapping - All (veridical) databases and information
systems involve granular partitions
66Intentional directedness
- is effected via partitions
- we reach out to the objects themselves because
our partitions are transparent
67A granular partition is like an open window
we use partitions because they help us to see the
world aright
68Some would deny the veridicality of intentionality
- partitions, concepts, contents are not
transparent, they say ... - we can never see objects as they really are, they
say ... - because we must always use those human artifacts
called partitions (concepts, ideas, words,
metaphors, image schemata ...)
69Against the veridicality of intentionality
- and whenever we grasp an object by means of a
concept we somehow change the object, - hence we can never know how the object really is
in itself - call this Midas-touch epistemology
70After Duchamp
- there is no place for talk of correct
perspectival representation, with its implication
to the effect that there is some single detached
master point of view - no method of painting can be true or
correct for there is no single notion of
reality against which its results could be matched
71The realist response
- even granting the simplifying assumptions of
geometrical optics, perspective paintings
correspond to the way we see the world around us
with a very high degree of accuracy. - The best explanation for this is the
mathematical forms captured in the geometry of
perspective are out there in the world
72The realist response
- even granting the simplifying assumptions
involved when we use a grid of cells of a certain
granularity, our intentional reference gives us
access to the world around us with a very high
degree of accuracy. - The best explanation for this is our granular
partitions are transparent to the structures out
there in the world
73Fit happens
74Fit happens
- There are structures out there in the world
accessible at different levels of granularity - (There are maps of different scales)
75Every one of the standard map projection systems
is correct
- the point is merely to use them properly
- maps do not lie (but they may be old, or embody
local errors) - intelligence of the projective technique vs.
stupidity of the interpreter
76The railway tracks on the Circle Line are not in
fact yellow
77There is no Gods eye perspective no view
from nowhere
- No super-partition encapsulating the entirety of
human knowledge - But this does not mean that every one of the
myriad perspectives we enjoy embodies a false
view of reality - Rather, it means that we must take distinct
(granular) perspectives together
78There is super-partition encapsulating the
entirety of human knowledge
Yet the claims of the scientific method to yield
knowledge of reality still stand the mistake
would be to claim that we can know reality only
through science (or through Haskell-programming,
or whatnot)
79Almost all of our partitions
- are transparent
- intentional directedness succeeds
- ... our job is to understand it
80THE END