True Grid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 73
About This Presentation
Title:

True Grid

Description:

True Grid Barry Smith http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith * – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: BarryS212
Category:
Tags: carto | grid | true

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: True Grid


1
True Grid
  • Barry Smith
  • http//ontology.buffalo.edu/smith

2
Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
author of Della pittura (1435-36) the first
scientific manual of painting
and simultaneously a contribution to the
ontology of visual representation
3
Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
Albertis grid
4
Leon Battista Alberti (1404-1472)
The goal of the artist is to produce a picture
that will represent the visible world as if the
observer of the picture were looking through a
window
5
Dürer
Underweysung der Messung (1525)
the problem of measuring the surfaces of reality
6
Panofsky
  • one can properly speak of a perspectival
    intuition of space only where
  • a whole picture is as it were transformed into a
    window through which we should then believe
    ourselves to be looking into the space

7
true or correct perspective
what is captured on a plane intersecting the
visual pyramid
8
true or correct perspective
what is captured by a transparent grid
9
Practical problem of perspective
  • solved by Brunelleschi in 1425
  • with a painting of the Baptistery of St. John in
    Florence

10
Baptistery
11
Brunelleschis Peepshow
12
Theoretical problem of perspective
solved by Alberti in Book 1of Della pittura The
solution, captured in the diagram of the
reticolato, belongs to projective geometry
13
How did Alberti solve the theoretical problem of
linear perspective ?
14
And why did mankind have to wait 1700 after
Euclids Geometry and Optics for this solution?
15
The answer belongs to the history of cartography
16
Ptolemys Geographia (c. 140 A.D.)
  • uses a regular mathematical grid system to map
    the entire known world

17
Ptolemaic World Maps
18
Ptolemys Regional World Divisions
19
Example of a Pre-Ptolemaic Map
20
Ptolemys grid system
  • transformed the relationship between astronomy
    and sublunar physics
  • ... this made the world below for the first time
    susceptible to uniform mathematical treatment

21
The Rediscovery of Ptolemys Geographia
  • Greek text arrived in Florence from
    Constantinople in 1400

22
Florence by 1424 a center of cartographic and
geographic study
  • commentaries on Florentine versions of the
    Geographia influenced Columbus

23
Uccello Gridded Challice c. 1450
24
Ptolemys grid system
  • not just mathematical regularity
  • also transparency
  • ... the grid helps us to see the world aright

25
Grids of Reality (Mercator 1569)
26
Alberti extended Ptolemys method to pictures
  • Alberti the veil affords the greatest
    assistance in executing your pictures,
  • since you can see any object that is round and
    in relief, represented on the flat surface of the
    veil.

27
Giotto
28
Ideal City
(Grid)
29
School of Athens
30
Albertis Ontology of Painting
  • 1. The grid of the reticolato and the grid of
    the objective reality beyond are linked together
    by a projective relation
  • 2. The grid effects a selection, from the
    totality of surfaces in objective reality, of
    those parts which will be foregrounded in the
    painting

31
the result of this selection is perfectly
objective
  • compare what happens on the stage in the theater
  • selection does not imply distortion

32
Degens Law
  • If a well-formed diagram is transparent to
    reality, then so are all its well-formed parts

From
33
we can validly infer
34
Mereological fallacies
  • Inferring that a part is the whole
  • Concluding, given a true representation, that
    truth implies completeness

35
Algebra
  • Algebraic ontologists are correct the world
    contains processes
  • they err only when they add and nothing else
  • Field ontologists are correct the world
    contains fields
  • they err only when they add and nothing else

36
Selection implies distortion
  • only if the mistake is made of assuming that the
    selected part is identical with the whole

37
The world contains fields
  • Evidence this assumption supports successful
    predictions
  • ? The world contains only fields and nothing
    else
  • This conclusion rests on a mereological fallacy
    (and also on a mistaken understanding of the role
    of granularity)

38
How to Tell the Truth with Maps
  • There are maps of different scales
  • There are transparent grids of different
    granularities

39
How to Tell the Truth with Maps
  • Albertis reticolato casts its transparent net
    over the array of planes out there in objective
    reality in such a way as to cast into relief a
    visual scene.
  • A good map casts its transparent net over
    reality in such a way as to cast into relief a
    certain portion of the surface of the earth

40
Some nets are regular
41
Some nets are irregular
42
Some nets are many-sorted
43
containing labeled and non-labeledcells formed
by
  • linear and non-linear icons
  • icons representing spatial regions

44
Most maps contain two grids of cells
  • projecting simultaneously onto the same
    underlying reality

45
The analogy between maps and pictures
  • has nothing to do with perspective
  • but rather with the highly general concept of a
    transparent grid and with an associated highly
    general notion of projection
  • But how are we to understand this notion of
    projection?

46
Problem
  • How many cells does this map contain?

47
Is the Western half of Wyoming represented on
this map?

48
Is the central square mile of Wyoming represented
on this map?
49
Is the capital of Wyoming represented on this map?
50
Is the Texas panhandle represented on this map?
51
Is Hot Springs County represented on this map?
52
Are the molecules of Wyoming represented on this
map?
53
Optical Projection
54
Cartographic Projection
55
Projection is involved wherever there is
intentionality
56
intentionality the directedness towards objects
of a mental act
57
The theory of transparent grids can help us to
understand how intentional directedness works
selection, foregrounding, labeling, classification
58
Intentional directedness
  • is effected in every case via something like
    an Albertian grid a cognitive artifact which we
    shall call a granular partition
  • we can reach out to objects because partitions
    are transparent

59
and such partitions
  • are always granular
  • when we perceive a frog we do not perceive the
    molecules in the frogs skin
  • when we think about Mary, we do not think about
    the molecules in Marys nose

60
Vagueness comes to awareness
  • through ontological zooming (from coarse-grained
    to fine-grained partitions)

61
This granularity of our partitions
  • explains also (how we are able to cope with) the
    phenomenon of vagueness
  • when we think about Mary, we do not think about
    the molecules in Marys nose
  • when we think about Mount Everest, we do not
    think about where, precisely, the mountain begins
    or ends in its foothills

62
Foreground/Background
granular partitions are involved wherever there
is a division of reality into foreground and
background
63
That granular partitions have multiple cells
corresponds to the fact that intentionality can
be many-rayed
  • people
  • my three sons
  • Benelux
  • the Germans
  • COSIT participants

64
Counting
counting involves
many-rayed intentionality
plus granularity
65
Granular partitions
  • are involved in simple acts of naming,
    classifying, seeing, recognizing, mapping
  • All (veridical) databases and information
    systems involve granular partitions

66
Intentional directedness
  • is effected via partitions
  • we reach out to the objects themselves because
    our partitions are transparent

67
A granular partition is like an open window
we use partitions because they help us to see the
world aright
68
Some would deny the veridicality of intentionality
  • partitions, concepts, contents are not
    transparent, they say ...
  • we can never see objects as they really are, they
    say ...
  • because we must always use those human artifacts
    called partitions (concepts, ideas, words,
    metaphors, image schemata ...)

69
Against the veridicality of intentionality
  • and whenever we grasp an object by means of a
    concept we somehow change the object,
  • hence we can never know how the object really is
    in itself
  • call this Midas-touch epistemology

70
After Duchamp
  • there is no place for talk of correct
    perspectival representation, with its implication
    to the effect that there is some single detached
    master point of view
  • no method of painting can be true or
    correct for there is no single notion of
    reality against which its results could be matched

71
The realist response
  • even granting the simplifying assumptions of
    geometrical optics, perspective paintings
    correspond to the way we see the world around us
    with a very high degree of accuracy.
  • The best explanation for this is the
    mathematical forms captured in the geometry of
    perspective are out there in the world

72
The realist response
  • even granting the simplifying assumptions
    involved when we use a grid of cells of a certain
    granularity, our intentional reference gives us
    access to the world around us with a very high
    degree of accuracy.
  • The best explanation for this is our granular
    partitions are transparent to the structures out
    there in the world

73
Fit happens
74
Fit happens
  • There are structures out there in the world
    accessible at different levels of granularity
  • (There are maps of different scales)

75
Every one of the standard map projection systems
is correct
  • the point is merely to use them properly
  • maps do not lie (but they may be old, or embody
    local errors)
  • intelligence of the projective technique vs.
    stupidity of the interpreter

76
The railway tracks on the Circle Line are not in
fact yellow
77
There is no Gods eye perspective no view
from nowhere
  • No super-partition encapsulating the entirety of
    human knowledge
  • But this does not mean that every one of the
    myriad perspectives we enjoy embodies a false
    view of reality
  • Rather, it means that we must take distinct
    (granular) perspectives together

78
There is super-partition encapsulating the
entirety of human knowledge
Yet the claims of the scientific method to yield
knowledge of reality still stand the mistake
would be to claim that we can know reality only
through science (or through Haskell-programming,
or whatnot)
79
Almost all of our partitions
  • are transparent
  • intentional directedness succeeds
  • ... our job is to understand it

80
THE END
  • THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com