Title: Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural Gas
1Modeling of Buoyant Plumes of Flammable Natural
Gas
- John Hargreaves
- Analyst
- Safety Basis Technical Services Group
LA-UR-12-21161
2Calculation of Natural Gas (NG) Hazards
- Analysis of natural gas (NG) explosions are
required in support of safe nuclear operations - This presentation will be based on work done
analyzing NG hazards near LANLs anticipated
construction of a new TRU waste facility (TWF)
3Analysis of the NG Hazard
- Analysis of an NG hazard requires
- Identification of suitable simplifying
assumptions and the geometry of the problem - Selection of an analytical method or model
- Determination of an NG source term
- Characterization of a trajectory and flammable
content of NG plume - Calculation of the hazard potential of
deflagration or detonation of the NG plume
4Assumptions and Limitations
- The analysis of an NG hazard requires assumptions
to define the problem - Modeling of natural gas
- Definition of the NG source term
- Modeling of plume, plume rise, and atmospheric
conditions - Limitations of modeling an NG plume
5Modeling Natural Gas
- Natural Gas can be modeled as pure methane
- NG is primarily methane (80 per cent or higher).
The natural gas used at LANL averages between 96
and 97 percent methane. Higher fractions, e.g.,
butane, ethane, and propane, are separated by the
vendor prior to delivery. Other constituents
such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and
nitrogen are also often removed, but may remain
in trace quantities. - Comparatively small molecule allows use of the
ideal gas law pv nRT
6Definition of NG Source Term
- Source can be a pipeline or a storage tank
- Pipeline flow may be treated as compressible and
friction-limited - Pipeline diameter, pipeline length, pressure,
pipe roughness, and Fanning friction factor. - Assumption on ambient pipeline temperature
required. - Determine conditions of flow, exit temperature,
Mach number, flow density, total mass flux and
volumetric flow -
Existing NG Pipeline Adjacent to TWF
7Definition of NG Source Term
- Solve for Mach number and exit pressure of flow
numerically - Determine flow condition i.e., choked or
unchoked - Determine density of exit flow this indicates
buoyancy
8Modeling a Buoyant Plume
- Plumes can be modeled as Gaussian, Top-Hat, or
Non-Gaussian - A Gaussian model assumes plume properties follow
a Gaussian distribution over the plume cross
section - A Top-Hat model assumes properties are constant
over the cross section - Models are based on equations for conservation of
fuel mass, total mass, and momentum
- Comparisons of these show top-hat and Gaussian
models give very similar results
9Modeling a Buoyant Plume
- Briggs and Hanna developed theory for vertical
and bent-over plumes - Plume rise divides into momentum- and
buoyancy-dominated flow - Based on initial momentum flux and buoyancy flux
- Plume rise is usually dominated early (up to 5 to
10 seconds) by momentum
- If advecting wind velocity is 1 m/s or less,
plume assumed to be vertical - Vertical rise and bent-plume trajectories
determined by the formulae -
- where u is the advecting wind velocity
10Limitations Modeling a Buoyant Plume
- Calculation of an exit velocity of the plume is
geometry or constant dependent - Terrain surface roughness can not be taken into
account - Gaussian distributions may not be accurate,
especially in low wind velocities - Building wake effects are ignored
- Localized air turbulence, aerosolization, gaseous
depolymerization, water vapor reactions forming
new products, or significant evaporation or
condensation - These last effects are more typical of heavier
species of gas and not natural gas (methane)
11Plume Trajectory Plots30 m Standoff 3-Inch Line
123-D Plume Trajectory Plot (50 m)
13Tying Together Pasquill Stability, Turner Air
Concentrations and Slade Power Law Approximations
14Plotting Concentration, Wind Speed, and Pasquill
Stability Class Together (30 m)
1530 m Standoff Distance a Problem
16Plotting Concentration, Wind Speed, and Pasquill
Stability Class Together (50 m)
17Determining Conservative Values for Explosive
Overpressures
- Overpressure can be calculated using the
TNT-equivalent method - Assume a cylindrical plume and assume a 9 v/o
air/methane mix - Very conservative approach, but has value in
possibly bounding the analysis - New theory by Epstein and Fauske allows more
precise calculation of total mass of flammable
gas released in a vertical plume