Spectral modeling and diagnostics in various astrophysical environments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Spectral modeling and diagnostics in various astrophysical environments

Description:

Spectral modeling and diagnostics in various astrophysical environments Jelle Kaastra SRON Topics Multi-temperature structure Resonance scattering in groups of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Jell51
Learn more at: https://physics.nist.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spectral modeling and diagnostics in various astrophysical environments


1
Spectral modeling and diagnostics in various
astrophysical environments
  • Jelle Kaastra
  • SRON

2
Topics
  • Multi-temperature structure
  • Resonance scattering in groups of galaxies
  • Foreground absorption
  • Photoionised outflows from AGN
  • Several examples using SPEX
  • (www.sron.nl/spex)

3
I. Multi-temperature structure
  • A warning against over-simplification

4
The Fe bias
Multi-T
1T
  • 1T models sometimes too simple e.g. in cool
    cores
  • Using 1T gives biased abundances (Fe-bias, Buote
    2000)
  • Example core M87 (Molendi Gastaldello 2001)

5
Complex temperature structure I(de Plaa et al.
2006)
  • Sérsic 159-3, central 4 arcmin
  • Better fits 1T?wdem?gdem
  • Implication for Fe 0.36?0.35?0.24
  • Implication for O 0.36?0.30?0.19

6
Inverse iron bias how does it work?
  • Simulation 2 comp, T2 T4 keV, equal emission
    measure
  • Best fit 1-T gives T2.68 keV
  • Fitted Fe abundance 11 too high
  • Due to different emissivity for Fe-L, Fe-K

7
Complex temperature structure II(Simionescu et
al. 2008)
  • Example Hydra A
  • Central 3 arcmin
  • Full spectrum Gaussian in log T (s0.2)
  • 1T fits individual regions also Gaussian
  • Confirmed by DEM analysis (blue purple)

8
II Resonance scattering in groups of galaxies
  • The importance of accurate atomic data
  • (Fe XVII)

9
Resonance scattering turbulence
10
Resonance scattering(NGC 5813, de Plaa et al.
2012)
11
Measured and predicted line ratios(de Plaa et
al. 2012)
12
Results
  • NGC 5813
  • vturb 140-540 km/s (15-45 of pressure)
  • NGC 5044
  • vturb gt320 km/s (gt 40 turbulence)

13
III Foreground absorption
  • Nasty correction factors are interesting!

14
Interstellar X-ray absorption
  • High-quality RGS spectrum X-ray binary GS1826-238
    (Pinto et al. 2010)
  • ISM modeled here with pure cold gas
  • Poor fit

15
Adding warmhot gas, dust
Adding warm hot gas
Adding dust
16
Oxygen complexity
17
Interstellar dust
  • SPEX (www.sron.nl/spex) currently has 51
    molecules with fine structure near K- L-edges
  • Database still growing (literature, experiments
    Costantini De Vries)
  • Example near O-edge (Costantini et al. 2012)

Transmission
23.7 Ang
22 Ang
18
Absorption edges more on dust
  • optimal view O Fe
  • Fe 90, O 20 in dust (Mg-rich silicates rather
    than Fe-rich MgFe 21 in silicates)
  • Metallic iron traces oxydes
  • Shown 4U1820-30, (Costantini et al. 2012)

19
Are we detecting GEMS?
FeS
  • GEMS glass with embedded metal sulphides
  • (e.g. Bradley et al. 2004)
  • interplanetary origin, but some have ISM origin
  • ? invoked as prototype of a classical silicate

Crystal olivine, pyroxene With Mg
Cosmic raysradiation
Metallic iron
Mg silicate
Glassy structure FeS
Sulfur evaporation
GEMS
20
IV Photoionised outflows from AGN
  • The need for complete models
  • and excellent data

21
Why study AGN outflows?
  • Feeding the monster delicate balance between
    inflow outflow onto supermassive black hole
  • Co-evolution of black hole host galaxy
  • Key to understand galaxy formation

Accretion
Outflows
22
Main questions outflows
  • What is the physical state of the gas?
  • Uniform density clouds in pressure equilibrium?
  • Or like coronal streamers, lateral density
    stratification?
  • Where is the gas?
  • Where is it launched? Disk, torus?
  • Mass loss, Lkin depend on r
  • Important for feedback

23
Observation campaign Mrk 509(Kaastra et al. 2011)
  • Monitoring campaign covering 100 days
  • Excellent 600 ks time-averaged spectrum
  • Observatories involved
  • XMM-Newton (UV, X-ray)
  • INTEGRAL (hard X-ray)
  • HST/COS (UV)
  • Swift (monitoring)
  • Chandra (softest X-rays)
  • 2 ground-based telescopes

24
Sample spectraRGS 600 ks, Detmers et al. 2011
(paper III)
25
Absorption Measure Distribution
Discrete components
Emission measure Column density
Continuous distribution
Ionisation parameter ?
Temperature
26
Discrete ionisation components?Detmers et al.
2011
  • Fitting RGS spectrum with 5 discrete absorber
    components (A-E)

27
Continuous AMD model?Detmers et al. 2011
  • Fit columns with continuous (spline) model
  • C D discrete components!
  • FWHM lt35 lt80
  • B ( A) too poor statistics to prove if
    continuous
  • E harder determined correlation ? NH
  • ? Discrete components

D
E
C
B
28
Pressure equilibrium? No!
Temperature
Pressure
Pressure
29
Differences photo-ionisation models
30
Density estimates reverberation
  • If L increases for gas at fixed n and r, then
    ?L/nr² increases
  • ? change in ionisation balance
  • ? ionic column density changes
  • ? transmission changes
  • Gas has finite ionisation/recombination time tr
    (density dependent as 1/n)
  • ? measuring delayed response yields tr?n?r

31
Time-dependent calculation
Total
Soft X
Hard X
32
Results where is the outflow?(Kaastra et al.
2012)
33
Conclusions
  • We showed 4 examples of different challenging
    astrophysical modeling
  • All depend on availability reliable atomic data
  • The SPEX code (www.sron.nl/spex) allows to do
    this spectral modeling fitting
  • Code its applications continuing development
    (since start 1970 by Mewe)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com