Title: Kyrgyz Republic
1Kyrgyz Republic
- TES of Bishkek first project proposal on
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in
frameworks of clean development mechanism - Zh. A. Molodsanova, A.K. Dzhundubaev
- JSC Electric stations
- Kyrgyz scientific and technical center Energy
- Bishkek
2Ratification of UNFCCC, ?? for UNFCCC of Kyrgyz
Republic
- Understanding importance of climate change
problem, necessity of international integration
of efforts of states on weakening of negative
consequences of that process, Kyrgyz Republic has
joined the UN Framework Convention on Climate
Change as well as has ratified the Kyoto Protocol
in January, 2000. - Law of Kyrgyz Republic on ratification of
UNFCCC was signed on January 14th, 2000. - Kyoto protocol has been ratified by the Law
of Kyrgyz Republic on January, 15th, 2003.
3National body on CDM
- One of the main requirements
defining conditions and procedures for
participation in CDM projects is creation of
National body on CDM. - National committee on consequences of
climate change with functions of national body on
Clean Development Mechanism in accordance with
requirements of Kyoto protocol of Kyrgyz Republic
was created on July 18th, 2005.
4- Main idea of project proposal is
partial substitution of outdated equipment on a
modern one in order to decrease fuel consumption
of largest TES of Kyrgyz Republic Bishkek TES
with set up capacity up to date - Electric 666 thousand kWt
- Thermal 1443,9 Gcal/h.
5Bishkek TES
- Main equipment consists of 24 steam generating
units of drum-type and 11 turbogenerator sets. - including
- ??? (laterolog)-160-100 13 units
- ???(laterolog) -220-100 11 units
6CO2 emissions of Bishkek TES, /thousand tones/
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1332 (35,5) 1516 (55,4) 1467 (54,9) 1402 (65,8) 1273 (69,7)
- in brackets coal share in fuel structure
7Bishkek TES
- Operating life of traps of station 1-3 of
Bishkek TES has exceeded term of exploitation,
reached overall depreciation, inefficient,
reliable in exploitation. Reconstruction and
introduction of new equipment and technologies is
required. -
8Bishkek TES
- Idea of the project
- Replacement of three low capacity traps ???
(laterolog)-160 to one with high capacity of 420
tones of steam per hour as a set with turbine
generator and automated system of fuel firing
management processes.
9Bishkek TES
- New technology of clean coal combustion (i.e.
circulating boiling layer) in suggested
equipment suits coal of all types, any quality as
well as its mixtures. It decreases deterioration
due to less accumulation of slugs. In addition to
that, the technology foresees fastening and
capture of sulphur and nitrogen oxides.
10Economy of fuel and decrease of CO2 emissions
from reconstruction of Bishkek TES by
introduction of trap aggregate of steam
production of 420 tones per hour whilst
production of thermal and electric energy on the
same level would be equal to
Fuel, (thousand t/year) ??2 emissions, (million tones/year)
102,6 0,200
11Figure of TES, Bishkek
Name of indicator Measure unit Base line (fact, 2006) Project line
Sale ?/? Thousand kWth 658602 658602
Sale ?/? Thousand Gcal 2053,1 2053,1
Total sale ?/??/? Thousand kWth 3046330,6 3046330,6
Natural fuel consumption, including
Domestic coal Thousand tones 13,9 20,0
Imported coal Thousand tones 654 599,8
Coal total Thousand tones 667,9 619,8
Oil fuel Thousand tones 0,15 0
Natural gas Million m3 143,5 79,8
Specific fuel consumption Thousand ??? 554,3 451,7
Carbon dioxide emission Thousand tones 1320,56 1120,35
Total emission of carbon dioxide on sale of electric and thermal energy ??2kg/kWth 0,43 0,37
Carbon dioxide emission reduction/year Thousand tones 200,21
12Budget of the project
Total expenses on the project 67,5 million US dollars
Expenses for development of Technical and Economic Assessment 0,3 million US dollars
????????? ???????????? 43 million US dollars including trap 28 million US dollars turbine - 15 million US dollars
Construction, wiring and start-and-adjustment works 17,5 US ?????????
Administrative costs, operating assets, conduction of preparation works, training of personnel 0,6 million US dollars
Unexpected expenses 6,1 million US dollars
13