Ch 3. Ratio Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Ch 3. Ratio Analysis

Description:

Debt affects a lot of other factors, including profit margin, ... Long term solvency. Debt/Equity. Coverage. Times interest earned. Asset Management. Inventory turnover. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:263
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: Eys79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ch 3. Ratio Analysis


1
Ch 3. Ratio Analysis
2
Issues in Ch.3
  • Common-size statements
  • Financial ratio analysis
  • Computation
  • More importantly, interpretation
  • Reading financial statements critically

3
Why Ratios?
  • Absolute numbers do not carry much significant
    meanings
  • Relative (or scaled or standardized) numbers
    provide more insights
  • For example, suppose the company made net income
    of 10 million last year. Is this good or bad?
    We dont know it until we standardize 10 million
    by say, total assets or sales revenue.

4
Standardized Financial Statements
  • Common-Size Balance Sheets
  • Compute all accounts as a percent of total assets
  • Common-Size Income Statements
  • Compute all line items as a percent of sales
  • Standardized statements make it easier to compare
    financial information, particularly as the
    company grows
  • They are also useful for comparing companies of
    different sizes, particularly within the same
    industry

5
Common-size statements (Standardized statements)
6
Common-size statements
7
(No Transcript)
8
Common Size Balance SheetsDivide all items by
Total Assets
Assets 2009 2010 2011E Ind.
Cash 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.3
ST Inv. 3.3 0.7 2.0 0.3
AR 23.9 21.9 25.0 22.4
Invent. 48.7 44.6 48.8 41.2
Total CA 76.5 67.4 76.2 64.1
Net FA 23.5 32.6 23.8 35.9
TA 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
9
Divide all items by Total Liabilities Equity
Assets 2009 2010 2011E Ind.
AP 9.9 11.2 10.2 11.9
Notes pay. 13.6 24.9 8.5 2.4
Accruals 9.3 9.9 10.8 9.5
Total CL 32.8 46.0 29.6 23.7
LT Debt 22.0 34.6 14.2 26.3
Total eq. 45.2 19.3 56.2 50.0
Total LE 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
10
Analysis of Common Size Balance Sheets
  • Computron has higher proportion of inventory and
    current assets than Industry.
  • Computron now has more equity (which means LESS
    debt) than Industry.
  • Computron has more short-term debt than industry,
    but less long-term debt than industry.

11
Common Size Income StatementDivide all items by
Sales
2009 2010 2011E Ind.
Sales 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
COGS 83.4 85.4 82.4 84.5
Other exp. 9.9 12.3 8.7 4.4
Depr. 0.6 2.0 1.7 4.0
EBIT 6.1 0.3 7.1 7.1
Int. Exp. 1.8 3.0 1.1 1.1
EBT 4.3 -2.7 6.0 5.9
Taxes 1.7 -1.1 2.4 2.4
NI 2.6 -1.6 3.6 3.6
12
Analysis of Common Size Income Statements
  • Computron has lower COGS (86.7) than industry
    (84.5), but higher other expenses. Result is
    that Computron has similar EBIT (7.1) as industry.

13
Financial Ratios
  • Liquidity ratios
  • Leverage ratios
  • Asset management ratios
  • Profitability ratios
  • Market value ratios
  • Du Pont Ratios

14
Using Bobcats Co.s financial statements,
calculate financial ratios.
  • Liquidity (short-term solvency) ratios Measures
    the ease and quickness with which the assets can
    be converted into cash with little or no loss in
    value.
  • Current ratio CA / CL
  • 100,000 / 150,000
  • .67 times
  • Quick(Acid-test) ratio (CA - Inv) / CL
  • (100,000 50,000) / 150,000
  • .33 times
  • Cash ratio Cash / Current Liabilities

15
Financial Ratios
  • Long-term debt (leverage) ratios
  • Total debt ratio TD / TA
  • 350,000 / 650,000
  • .54 times
  • Debt-Equity ratio TD / TE
  • 350,000 / 300,000
  • 1.17 times
  • Times interest earned (TIE) EBIT / Int. Exp.
  • 200,000 / 10,000
  • 20 times

16
Typically, financially troubled firms shows
severe deterioration of liquidity and leverage
ratios.
17
Financial Ratios
  • Asset management (turnover) ratios
  • Inventory turnover COGS / Inv
  • 400,000 / 50,000 8 times
  • Days sales in inventory 365 / Inventory
    turnover
  • 365 / 8 45.6 days
  • Accounts receivable turnover Sales / AR
  • 800,000 / 20,000 40 times
  • Days sales on receivables 365 / Accounts
    receivable turnover
  • 365 / 40 9.1 days
  • Accounts payable turnover COGS / Accounts
    payable
  • 400 / 70 5.7 times
  • Average payable period 365 / Accounts payable
    turnover
  • 365 / 5.7 63.9 days
  • Total asset turnover Sales / TA
  • 80
  • Capital intensity TA / Sales
  • 8000 / 650,000 1.2 times

18
Financial Ratios
  • Profitability ratios
  • Profit margin NI / Sales
  • 125,400 / 80,000 15.7
  • Return on asset NI / TA
  • 125,400 / 650,000 19.3
  • Return on equity NI / TE
  • 125,400 / 300,000 41.8

19
More about ROA
20
More about ROE
FLM Financial Leverage Multiplier or Equity
Multiplier
21
Financial Ratios
  • Market Value Ratios
  • Assume that a share price of Bobcats is currently
    20 per share, and the number of shares
    outstanding is 20,000.
  • Price-Earnings Ratio (PE ratio)
  • Price per share / Earnings per share
  • 20 / (125,400 / 20,000) 20 / 6.27 3.19
    times
  • Market-to-book ratio
  • Market value per share / Book value per
    share
  • 20 / (300,000 / 200,000) 20 / 15 1.33
    times
  • Note Earnings per share Net Income / of
    shares outstanding
  • Book value Shareholders equity
  • Market Capitalization
  • Price per share Shares outstanding
  • 20

22
Price-Earning Ratio
  • If PE ratio 10, then we would say the company's
    stock sell for 10 times earnings.
  • PE ratio measures how much investors are willing
    to pay per dollar of current earnings.
  • The higher the PE ratio is, the higher the firms
    growth prospects would be in the future.
  • Growth Stock stocks with relatively higher PE
    ratio (e.g., Tech stocks)
  • Value stock stocks with relatively lower PE
    ratio (e.g., Utility stocks)
  • Watch out If the firm generates almost no
    earnings, then PE ratio could be very large.
    (Why?) So, care is needed in interpreting this
    ratio

23
Market-to-Book Ratios in 2010
24
Using the Du Pont Identity
  • ROE PM TAT EM
  • NI / TE (NI / Sales) (Sales / TA) (TA /
    TE)
  • Profit margin is a measure of the firms
    operating efficiency how well does it control
    costs
  • Total asset turnover is a measure of the firms
    asset use efficiency how well does it manage
    its assets
  • Equity multiplier is a measure of the firms
    financial leverage

25
Du Pont Analysis
26
DuPont Analysis Problem
  • The following table contains information about
    Campbells (CPB) and H.J. Heinz (HNZ). Compute
    their respective ROEs and then determine how much
    Heinz would need to increase its asset turnover
    in order to match Campbells ROE.

Profit Margin Asset Turnover Equity Multiplier Equity Multiplier
Campbells 10.8 1.22 6.78  
Heinz 8.22 1.04 5.33  
27
DuPont Analysis Solution
  • We can compute the ROE of each company by
    multiplying together its profit margin, asset
    turnover, and equity multiplier.
  • In order to determine how much Heinz would need
    to increase its asset turnover to match
    Campbells ROE, we can set Heinzs ROE equal to
    Campbells, keep its profit margin and equity
    multiplier fixed, and solve for the asset
    turnover.
  • Using the DuPont Identity, we have
  • ROECPB 10.8 x 1.22 x 6.78 89.3
  • ROEHNZ 8.22 x 1.04 x 5.33 45.6
  • Now, using Campbells ROE, but Heinzs profit
    margin and equity multiplier, we can solve for
    the asset turnover that Heinz needs to achieve
    Campbells ROE
  • 89.3 8.22 x Asset Turnover x 5.33
  • Asset Turnover 89.3 / 43.8 2.04

28
DuPont Analysis Evaluate
  • Heinz would have to increase its asset turnover
    from 1.04 to 2.04 in order to match Campbells
    ROE.
  • This large increase in asset turnover is required
    because of its lower equity multiplier (5.33 vs.
    6.78) (lower leverage) and lower profit margin
    (8.22 vs. 10.8).

29
Payout and Retention Ratios
  • Suppose Bobcat Co. distributed 40,128 of cash
    dividends.
  • Dividend payout ratio
  • Cash dividends / Net income
  • 40,128 / 125,400 32
  • Retention ratio
  • Additions to retained earnings / Net income
  • 1 payout ratio
  • 1 32 68

30
(No Transcript)
31
Internal and Sustainable GrowthPayout and
Retention Ratios
  • Dividend payout ratio
  • Cash dividends / Net income (DIV / NI)
  • 121/363 33.3

32
Internal and Sustainable GrowthPayout and
Retention Ratios
  • Retention ratio (b) (NI - DIV)/ NI
  • Addition to Retained Earnings / Net income
  • 242/363 66.7

33
The Internal Growth Rate
  • How much the firm can grow assets using retained
    earnings as the only source of financing.

34
The Sustainable Growth Rate
  • How much the firm can grow by using internally
    generated funds and issuing debt to maintain a
    constant debt ratio.

35
Determinants of Growth
  • Profit margin operating efficiency
  • Total asset turnover asset use efficiency
  • Financial leverage choice of optimal debt ratio
  • Dividend policy choice of how much to pay to
    shareholders versus reinvesting in the firm

36
Why Evaluate Financial Statements?
  • Internal uses
  • Performance evaluation compensation and
    comparison between divisions
  • Planning for the future guide in estimating
    future cash flows
  • External uses
  • Creditors
  • Suppliers
  • Customers
  • Stockholders

37
Benchmarking
  • Ratios are not very helpful by themselves they
    need to be compared to something
  • Time-Trend Analysis
  • one-year ratios do NOT provide a full picture
  • Used to see how the firms performance is
    changing through time
  • Do multi-year analysis
  • Peer Group Analysis
  • Compare to similar companies or within industries
  • SIC and NAICS codes (http//www.naics.com/)
  • Should be used in conjunction with other
    qualitative measurements. For example,
    heterogeneity in accounting practice, market
    structures, customer bases, capital structures,
    etc.

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Peer Group Analysis (http//yahoo.marketguide.com)
Advanced Micro Device (AMD)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Trend analysis in the computer industry
43
Comparative Analysis Lowes vs. Home Depot
44
Ratio Analysis
  • Saxton Industry
  • Company Average Conclusion
  • A. Profitability
  • 1. Profit Margin 5.0 6.7 Below
    average
  • 2. Return on Assets .. 12.5 10.0 Above
    average due to high turnover
  • 3. Return on Equity .. 20.0 15.0 Good
  • B. Asset Utilization
  • 4. Receivables turnover . 11.4 10.0 Good
  • 5. Average collection period. 32.0 36.0 Good
  • 6. Inventory turnover ... 10.8 7.0 Good
  • 7. Fixed asset turnover . 5.0 5.4 Below
    average
  • 8. Total asset turnover . 2.5 1.5 Good
  • C. Liquidity
  • 9. Current ratio 2.67 2.1 Good
  • 10. Quick Ratio .. 1.43 1.0 Good
  • D. Debt Utilization

45
Summarizing Ratios (20072009, Including 2009
Industry Averages)
46
Summarizing Ratios (cont.)(20072009, Including
2009 Industry Averages)
47
Quiz 1
  • You have the following data for the Frank Winery
  • Earnings before taxes 300,000,
  • Total asset turnover 0.80,
  • Sales 800,000
  • Tax rate 35.
  • What is the firm's return on assets (ROA)?

48
Quiz 2
  • If total debt ratio is 20, and ROA is 5, what
    is ROE?

49
Quiz 3
  • The current ratio of a firm would be increased
    by which of the following?
  • a. land held for investment is sold for cash
  • b. equipment is purchased, financed by a
    long-term debt issue
  • c. inventories are sold for cash
  • d. inventories are sold on a credit basis

50
Quiz 4
  • Which ratio measures the financial or credit
    risk?
  • Which ratio measures the companys ability to
    service its fixed interest payment?
  • Which ratio measures the companys ability to pay
    off short-term obligations like notes payables
    and accounts payables?
  • Which ratio measures how well the company
    generates revenues and controls costs and
    expenses (i.e., overall operating effectiveness)?
  • Which ratio measures the companys ability to
    deliver the shareholders value?
  • Which ratio measures the companys market price
    relative to 1 of capital that was invested by
    shareholders?

51
Common Size Balance Sheet
For SP Composite Index Firms during 2005
52
Common Size Income Statement
For SP Composite Index Firms during 2005
53
Financial Ratios
2005 Ratios for selected firms
54
Limitations of Financial Ratio Analysis
  1. Difficult to identify industry categories or
    comparable peers.
  2. Published peer group or industry averages are
    only approximations.
  3. Industry averages may not provide a desirable
    target ratio or norm.
  4. Accounting practices differ widely among firms
  5. A high or low ratio does not automatically lead
    to a specific favorable or unfavorable
    conclusion.
  6. Seasons may bias the numbers in the financial
    statements.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com