The fiscal consolidation programme: fundamental problems and progressive alternatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The fiscal consolidation programme: fundamental problems and progressive alternatives

Description:

The fiscal consolidation programme: fundamental problems and progressive alternatives Malcolm Sawyer University of Leeds – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: lub55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The fiscal consolidation programme: fundamental problems and progressive alternatives


1
The fiscal consolidation programme fundamental
problems and progressive alternatives
  • Malcolm Sawyer
  • University of Leeds

2
Outline
  • Reminder of some basic relationships
  • Why cannot the budget deficits just unwind as
    recovery comes ?
  • Moving the goal posts objectives
  • Moving the goal posts potential output

3
Outline
  • Why balanced budgets undesirable
  • Why structural balanced budgets unachievable
  • Three ways to full employment reducing
    inequality and savings

4
Two basic relationships
  • G T S I M X
  • G government expenditure, T tax revenue, S,
    savings, I investment, M imports, X exports

5
Two basic relationships
  • b d/g (b Debt to GDP ratio d budget deficit
    to GDP ratio, g nominal growth rate)
  • d b(g i) (d primary budget deficit to GDP,
    i interest rate on bonds
  • When g i, borrowing from rentiers to pay
    interest to rentiers

6
Budget deficits and public expenditure cuts
  • The budget deficit rose because of recession why
    not let recovery come and reduce budget deficit ?
  • Financial crisis and tax receipts
  • Reductions in discretionary expenditure

7
Budget deficits and public expenditure cuts
  • The objective is now balanced structural budget.
  • Replaces golden rule of public finances
  • Effect of that decision is to seek to budget
    deficit on average 3 per cent of GDP smaller.
  • Equivalent to reducing public expenditure by
    order of 6 to 7 per cent allowing for taxes on
    expenditure 10 per cent.

8
Budget deficits and public expenditure cuts
  • What has happened to potential output Y ?
  • Reduction of the order of 5 per cent
    implications for costs of financial crisis
  • Lowers tax receipts at potential by order of 2
    per cent of GDP
  • Does the economy have to operate at potential
    output ?

9
Impossibility of zero deficits
  • Trend to aim of zero structural budget deficits
  • The contrast with the historic experience
  • G T (S I) (M X) indicates that the
    achievement of zero deficit as compared with
    previous experience would require corresponding
    changes in S, I, M, X

10
Impossibility of zero deficits
  • The impossibility of zero structural budget
    deficit when S(Y) I(Y) M(Y) X(YT) gt 0
    where Y is potential output.
  • The stupidity of present UK and EMU budget
    policies

11
Impossibility of zero deficits
  • UK forecast to achieve zero deficit at potential
    output in 2015 is that possible ?
  • Based on rapid growth of investment, exports and
    the economy
  • Investment/GDP at highest level this century,
    exports grow almost twice as fast as imports,
    current account surplus

12
Three ways to full employment
  • Budget deficit, stimulation of investment,
    redistribution of income (Kalecki, 1944)
  • Limits on stimulation of investment (as compared
    with recent experience)
  • Raising net exports ?

13
Three ways to full employment
  • The rise in inequality and implications for
    demand and debt
  • Role of corporate savings and household debt

14
Three ways to full employment
  • Changing savings propensity through higher
    taxation
  • Redistribution from profits to wages to lower
    savings
  • Changing income inequality to lower savings

15
Re-distribution policies
  • Wages rising faster than productivity
  • Minimum and living wages
  • Progressive taxation
  • Guessing orders of magnitude

16
Concluding comments
  • Public expenditure cuts are a matter of choice
    not necessity
  • Attempts to have structural balanced budget will
    not succeed
  • Reducing inequality is the progressive way to
    reduce budget deficits
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com