Proteomics technologies and protein-protein interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Proteomics technologies and protein-protein interaction

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Anders Fausb ll Last modified by: Srinivas Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Ander235
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proteomics technologies and protein-protein interaction


1
Proteomics technologies and protein-protein
interaction
  • Lars Kiemer
  • Center for Biological Sequence Analysis
  • The Technical University of Denmark
  • Advanced bioinformatics November 2005

2
Outlining the problem
  • Around 30 of the human proteins still have no
    annotated function.
  • Even if the function is known, we often dont
    know anything about the big picture (regulation?,
    multiple functions?, pathogenesis?, mutations?,
    splice variants?).
  • In fact, the individual proteins are as
    interesting as bricks in a wall what we want to
    know about is the system.

3
Example signal transduction cascade
EXTRACELLULAR
NCAM
NCAM
CB1
NCAM
FGFR
NCAM
Ras
bRaf
Frs2
PKC
Sos
Ca2
Raf
Shc
Grb2
C-Fos
DAGL
MEK
CYTOPLASM
Fyn
PLC?
PKA
CREB
MAPK
Rap1
MAPK
Fak
CaMKII
NUCLEUS
GAP43
4
Example signal transduction cascade
EXTRACELLULAR
NCAM
NCAM
NCAM
2-AG
DAG
PIP2
Ras
Frs2
NCAM
DAGL
Sos
Grb2
Fyn
Sos
PLC?
Shc
Fak
Grb2
Raf
IP3
Ca2
PKC
PKA
MEK
CYTOPLASM
GAP43
NUCLEUS
MAPK
CaMKII
CREB
MAPK
C-Fos
Transcription
5
Obtaining data
  • High-throughput data can provide information
    about interactions with other proteins, protein
    abundance in different tissues, transcriptional
    regulation, etc.
  • High-throughput experimental techniques provide
    large data sets thus no manual curation is
    possible.
  • ? These data sets often contain false positives.
  • ? But combining several such data sets
    increases confidence.

6
Protein interactions reveal a lot!
  • Hints of the function of a protein are revealed
    when its interaction partners are known.
  • Guilt by association!
  • Complexes in which none of the interaction
    partners have known functions are even more
    interesting.

7
Yeast-two-hybrid screening
  • Has been widely used
  • Only binary interactions
  • High false postive rate
  • Proteins must be able to enter the nucleus

8
Affinity purification
  • Large-scale
  • Can be done on any preparation of cells
  • Often complexes are purified and the order of
    binding is not obtained
  • An extra step is needed to identify purified
    proteins

9
Mass spectrometer
Q1
q2

TOF
3 principal components
10
Mass spectrometry in short
  • Extremely sensitive
  • Weight precision of one atom
  • In principle, detection of one, relatively short
    peptide allows for unambiguous identification.
  • Some proteins are difficult to chop up with
    proteases.
  • Some peptides are very difficult to ionize.
  • Due to the high sensitivity of the method,
    contaminations are difficult to avoid.

11
Protein interaction databases Spoke/Matrix
Affinity pulldown
Bait
Prey
Spoke
Matrix
Truth?
12
Protein interaction databases Overlap
Protein interaction data A total of 18.629
articles represented in the databases (June
2005).
Database Unique article references interaction pairs in unique references.
DIP 1.353 5.403 (binary?)
MINT 1.406 5.430 (spoke)
Intact 355 6.836 (spoke)
GRID 1.232 49.135 (binary?)
BIND (protein part) 5.733 44.279 (spoke/matrix)
HPRD 6.989 14.533 (matrix)
Approx. 10 of pp interactions in BIND are db
imports
13
Species bias in available data
  • A few select organisms are very well-studied,
    while others are not.
  • The BIND database, species distribution (Alfarano
    et al., NAR, 2005)

14
Trans-organism protein interaction network
Orthologs? Orthologous genes are direct
descendants of a gene in a common ancestor
S. cerevisiae
D. melanogaster
H. sapiens
(O'Brien K, Remm et al. 2005)
15
Trans-organism protein interaction network
H. sapiens MOSAIC
D. melanogaster Experim.
C. elegans Experim.
S. cerevisiae Experim.
16
Repetition of experiments adds credibility
Light blue connection 1 experiment. Darker blue
connection gt1 experiment, 1 organism. Purple
connection - gt1 experiment, gt1 organisms.
17
Adding co-expression data
Red connector co-expression in 80 different
tissues with a correlation coefficient above
0.7. Grey nodes no expression data available.
18
Nucleolus dynamics
Nodes are coloured according to level of protein
in the nucleolus following transcriptional
inhibition (Andersen et al., Nature, 2005).
19
Adding up to make high quality associations
Integration of various data sources builds up
confidence
20
Upon integration comes enlightenment
21
Upon integration comes enlightenment
22
Identifying functional complexes
23
Summary
  • Protein-protein interactions can reveal hints
    about the function of a protein (guilt by
    association).
  • Information about protein interactions is
    obtained with different technologies each with
    its own advantages and weaknesses.
  • Due to the high degree of systemic conservation,
    interactions can be inferred from observed
    interactions in other species.
  • Data are always error-prone. Repeated
    observations build up confidence.
  • Integrating different types of data can futher
    build up confidence.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com