Title: IV.3 Designs to Minimize Variability
1IV.3 Designs to Minimize Variability
- Background
- An Example
- Design Steps
- Transformations
- The Analysis
- A Case Study
2BackgroundAccuracy/Precision
- Factors Can Affect Response Variable by Either
- Changing Its Average Value (Accuracy)
- Changing Its Variation (Precision) or
- BOTH
3BackgroundExample 4 - Example I.2.3 Revisited
- Which Factors Affect
- Accuracy?
- Precision?
4BackgroundAnalysis for Changes in Variability
- For studying Variability, we can use ALL the
designs, ALL the ideas that we used when studying
changes in mean response level. - However,
- Smaller Variability is ALWAYS better
- We MUST work with replicated experiments
- We will need to transform the response s
5Example 5Mounting an Integrated Circuit on
SubstrateFigure 5 - Factor LevelLochner and
Matar - Figure 5.11
6Example 5 - Design StepsSelecting the
DesignFigure 6 - The Experimental DesignLochner
and Matar - Figure 5.12
- 1. Select an appropriate experimental design
7Example 5 - Design StepsReplication and
Randomization
- 2. Determine number of replicates to be used
- Consider at Least 5 (up to 10)
- In Example 5 5 replicates, 40 trials
- 3. Randomize order of ALL trials
- Replicates Run Sequentially Often Have Less
Variation Than True Process Variation - This May Be Inconvenient!
8Example 5 - Design StepsCollecting the
DataFigure 7 - The DataLochner and Matar -
Figure 5.13
- 4. Perform experiment record data
- 5. Group data for each factor level combination
and calculate s.
9Example 5 - Design StepsThe Analysis
- 6. Calculate logarithms of standard deviations
obtained in 5. Record these. - 7. Analyze log s as the response.
10TransformationsWhy transform s?
- If the data follow a bell-shaped curve, then so
do the cell means and the factor effects for the
means. However, the cell standard deviations and
factor effects of the standard deviations do not
follow a bell-shaped curve. - If we plot such data on our normal plotting
paper, we would obtain a graph that indicates
important or unusual factor effects in the
absence of any real effect. The log
transformation normalizes the data.
11TransformationsDistributions and Normal
Probability Plots of s2 and Log(s2)
12Example 5 - AnalysisFigure 8 - Response Table
for MeanLochner and Matar - Figure 5.14
 y A B C AB AC BC D
Standard Order Bond Strength Adhesive Type Conductor Material Cure Time    IC Post Coating
1 73.48 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1
2 83.88 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1
3 81.58 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1
4 75.6 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1
5 87.06 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1
6 79.54 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1
7 79.38 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1
8 90.32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sum 650.84 7.84 2.92 21.76 2.08 -1 3.28 34.84
Divisor 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Effect 81.355 1.96 0.73 5.44 0.52 -0.25 0.82 8.71
13Example 5 - AnalysisFigure 9 - Response Table
for Log(s)Lochner and Matar - Figure 5.15
 y A B C AB AC BC D
Standard Order Log(s) Adhesive Type Conductor Material Cure Time    IC Post Coating
1 0.196 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1
2 0.314 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1
3 -0.097 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1
4 0.713 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1
5 -0.149 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1
6 0.467 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1
7 0.149 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1
8 0.299 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sum 1.892 1.694 0.236 -0.36 0.226 -0.162 0.024 -1.158
Divisor 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Effect 0.2365 0.4235 0.059 -0.09 0.0565 -0.041 0.006 -0.2895
14Example 5 - AnalysisFigure 10 - Effects Normal
Probability Plot for Mean
- What Factor Settings Favorably Affect the Mean?
15Example 5 - AnalysisFigure 11 - Effects Normal
Probability Plot for Log(s)Lochner and Matar -
Figure 5.16
- What Factor Settings Favorably Affect Variability?
16Example 5 - Interpretation
- Silver IC post coating increases bond strength
and decreases variation in bond strength. - Adhesive D2A decreases variation in bond
strength. - 120-minute cure time increases bond strength.
17Case Study 1Filling Weight of Dry Soup Mix -
Factors and Response
18Case Study 1Filling Weight of Dry Soup Mix -
Effects Table
- Interpret This Data
- Determine the Important Effects
- Do the Interaction Tables and Plots for
Significant Interactions