Title: Shuttle Service Life Extension
1Shuttle Service Life Extension
Michoud Assembly Facility, La. 19, 20 March 03
Safety Message
Bryan OConnor NASA Safety Officer
(1)
2Part of the Story Reacting to the Mishap
- Once harm has been done, even a fool can
understand it
Homer, The Illiad, Book XVII, 1.32
3Safety Upgrades How do We Know What to Fix?
- One should expect that the expected can be
prevented, but the unexpected should have been
expected
Augustines Laws, XLV
4Safety Upgrades How do We Know What to Fix?
- There are things we know that we know,
- There are things we know we dont know,
- There are things we dont know we dont know.
Donald Rumsfeld, U. S. SecDef NATO HQ Press
Conference, June 02
5The Risk Iceberg (3 levels, not 2)
- Mishap recommendations
- Problem solutions
- IFA fixes
- FMEA/Hazard controls
- Close call recommendations
- Ignored close calls?
- Old cert, new environment?
- Inadvertent excursions out of cert/family?
- Hardware talkingnobody listening?
Known Knowns
Known Unknowns
Unknown Unknowns
6Safety Thought of the Day
Flying Safely to 2020 and beyond means
attacking relentlessly all three levels of the
risk iceberg!
7Shuttle Service Life Extension
Michoud Assembly Facility, La. 20 March 03
Safety Message
Bryan OConnor NASA Safety Officer
(1)
8Safety What does it mean?
- The condition of being free from harm
- Secure from the threat of danger
- A technical contrivance to prevent an accident
- Unlikely to produce controversy
Websters Unabridged Dictionary
9Safety How does it fit in our priorities?
- First Shuttle program priority
- Fly Safely
- Note Safety is not the first priority!
- If it were, we would just stop flying and avoid
all risk - SLEP means doing what it takes to fly (safely)
through 2020 - Therefore,
-
- Supportability and safety share first priority
10Safety What does NASA mean?
- Strategic Plan
- Safety is a core value (not a mission)
- Think of it as an adverb that modifies all Agency
verbs - Agency Safety Initiative 1999
- Objectives (in rank order)
- Protect the public
- Protect astronauts and pilots
- Protect our workforce
- Protect our high value equipment and facilities
- Core Elements
- Management commitment
- Employee involvement
- Hazard analysis
- Risk mitigation
- Training and education
11Safety What about maintaining vs. improving?
- Maintaining safety is not good enough
- Todays safety level (even after fixing Columbia
problems) is only appropriate for a going out of
business schedule - Unknown unknowns must be balanced by known
unknown mitigators or they will slowly increase
overall risk - We must also figure out ways to limit the number
of unknown unknowns - Overall risk level is too high for a long term
commitment (OConnor philosophy issue) - Extending shuttle through 2020 demands that we
improve safety, not just maintain it - Real world says that safety improvement upgrades
will be limited by resources available - Suggestion do not let mission changes compete
for SLEP resourcesdemand that new missions bring
money
12Safety perspective on SLEP priorities
- Fly to 2020 and maintain overall safety at
current level (this means some improvements
required to counter unknown risk creep) - Improve safety with ASI priorities in mind
- Public
- Our people
- Our high value equipment and facilities
- Meet the manifest (schedule dependability and
current mission success improvements - Improve the system (efficiencies, and everything
else that does not fall under 1-3) - Note new missions bring money