Feedback on Paper Two - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Feedback on Paper Two

Description:

Feedback on Paper Two CRTW 201 Dr. Fike – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: fik88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feedback on Paper Two


1
Feedback on Paper Two
  • CRTW 201
  • Dr. Fike

2
Grading
  • I was looking for 4 things
  • Did you have 4 pages minimum?
  • Did you have all parts of the classical argument
    plus a bridge paragraph?
  • Did you do your Works Cited list correctly?
  • Did you have fewer than 12 categories of errors
    on the grid?
  • For each no answer, I deducted .5 point.
  • With the exception of MLA format, these
    components did not have to be perfect they just
    had to be present.

3
This Slide Show
  • I will walk you through the paper and emphasize
    the most important things that a lot of you need
    to work on.

4
Introduction
  • Mention the passage in the introduction and say
    something about it in the thesis.
  • Do not quote it here, however. Just establish
    the expectation that you will quote it in the
    body.

5
A Really Good Thesis
  • Although nature plays a role, I will argue that
    my ability to think as an Early Childhood
    Education major (as illustrated by the passage in
    Exploring Education) is due mainly to nurture
    because of the influence of my mother who is a
    teacher in the Early Childhood field.
  • Key components
  • An although clause that anticipates objections,
  • A main clause that mentions the passage and gives
    a controversial idea for which the paper will
    argue,
  • And a because clause that gives a reason why
    and anticipates arguments

6
Length of Introduction
  • It should be at least 5 sentences / half a page.
  • I want to see your thesis on page 1.

7
Background Paragraph
  • You need a good topic sentence, but it must be a
    sentence that the paragraph actually supports.
  • Quote the passage double space, double indent.
  • Add 2-3 sentences after the quotation. Digest
    the quotation a bit before starting a new
    paragraph.
  • Do not just start a new paragraph or go on to the
    elements in the same paragraph.

8
Your Passage
  • It has to be a paragraph not one or two
    sentences.
  • Pick something interesting and controversial,
    something that you will have to THINK about.
  • If you cannot apply the elements to it, pick
    another passage.
  • The passage has to be about something in your
    field, not about critical thinking in general.

9
The Elements
  • Apply the elements of critical thinking in a
    separate paragraph. It is okay to have more than
    one paragraph on the elements.
  • Talk about what is IN the passage, not about your
    discipline in general.
  • Underline the name of each element The purpose
    of music therapy is to recognize.

10
Problem Confusion about Q_at_I
  • There is only one Question at Issue in the
    passage.
  • Do not be confused by the presence of multiple
    questions in the passage.
  • What OVERALL question is the author trying to
    answer? That is the Q_at_I.

11
Problem Order of Elements
  • You followed Nosichs order on page 68, and it is
    true that you can start with any element.
  • But for Paper Two you need a different order. I
    suggest
  • Contextthe source from which you took the
    quotation
  • Point of view
  • Q_at_I
  • Purpose
  • Other elements in whatever order seems logical.
  • If your order is arbitrary because you followed
    Nosichs list, your organization will be jumbled.

12
Bridge Paragraph
  • Between the elements paragraph and the arguments
    paragraph, give me a bridge paragraph.
  • A bridge between what two things?
  • Between what you just did with your passage and
    the elements
  • And what you did in the exercise on pages 63-64
  • There is OVERLAP between thinking about your
    passage in particular and thinking in your
    discipline in general.
  • This intersection is what belongs in the bridge
    paragraph. Think partially overlapping circles.
  • The overlapping part should contain the type or
    types of thinking that you should EXTRACT (not
    exacttypo) from the elements section to argue
    about in the next section of the paper.

13
Argument Section
  • Here is the problem with micro-managing your
    papers If I do not mention something, you
    assume that you do not need to include it.
  • I did not specifically tell you to mention your
    passage in the argument section of the paper
    therefore, you did not bother to do so.

14
But Remember
  • Your passage is your focus.
  • You must talk about the focused topic in every
    paragraph.
  • Therefore, you should mention your passage in
    your argument/objection/reply paragraphs.
  • Otherwise, you have a paper that reads like a
    chopped up snakeno unity.

15
How To Increase Unity
  • Often a key concept will arise from your passage
    like these examples from your papers
  • Concentration
  • Great teacher
  • Imitation
  • Building such a concept into the thesis and topic
    sentences would greatly increase the papers
    unity.

16
Another Way To Increase Unity
  • There is another reason for lack of unity in your
    papers namely, a disconnection between two
    things
  • Where does your ability to think in your
    discipline come fromnature or nurture? This is
    what youre supposed to argue about.
  • And one of the following things that you actually
    discussed
  • What makes you, for example, a suitable teacher?
  • How did you come to the decision that you should
    be a teacher?
  • Stay with thinking in your discipline do not
    meander off on a tangent.

17
Objections
  • They have to be more than one sentence.
  • Do two things in your objection paragraph
  • Poke holes in your arguments.
  • Offer the alternative (nature vs. nurture)
  • In other words, you should first object directly
    to the argumentsstate that they are weak in
    particular ways. THEN give your alternative view.

18
Reply
  • Concession has to be more than a sentence or
    less
  • These objections are pretty realistic. Then
    the paper arbitrarily claims that they are less
    weighty than the arguments.
  • Well, why are they pretty realistic?
  • Make the concession a substantive part of your
    paper, not just a structural element.
  • You will probably need a topic sentence that
    anticipates both concession and reply.

19
Conclusion
  • Are you in the right major?
  • Which one of Ridleys statements about nature and
    nurture seems most relevant to your situation?
  • Answer these questions at a minimum.

20
Works Cited List
  • Double space not only within but also between
    entries.

21
Correct This W.C. Entry
  • Ridley, Matt. Genome The Autobiography
  • of a Species in 23 Chapters. New York, NY
    HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 1999.

22
Corrected Version
  • Ridley, Matt. Genome The Autobiography
  • of a Species in 23 Chapters. New York
  • HarperCollins, 1999.

23
Conferences
  • Bring 2 copies of your graded draft and comment
    sheet.
  • Be prepared to ask questions, make comments,
    propose solutions to problems.
  • If you do all of that, you will receive 5/5.
  • If you leave something out, you will receive 4/5.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com