Title: Testing Social Learning Theory
1Testing Social Learning Theory
- Delinquent Peer Associations (Stimulant Survey)
What proportion of your closest friends
Cheated on exams or papers
Sold marijuana
Sold drug other than marijuana
Pirated things off the Internet
Bought something they thought might be stolen
Stole something worth less than 50
Stole something worth more than 50
Purposely damaged property without the owners permission
2Survey Says
- Delinquent Peer correlates moderately with
- Illicit stimulant use ever (.25) and in the past
year (.15) - Marijuana use in past year (.35)
- Academic fraud (.38)
- Deviance/Crime (.49)
- Binge drinking (.29)
3Testing Social Learning Theory
- Moral Beliefs (Definitions)
How wrong is it to
Cheat on exams or papers
Sell marijuana
Sell drug other than marijuana
Pirate things off the Internet
Buy something they thought might be stolen
Steal something worth less than 50
Steal something worth more than 50
Purposely damage property without the owners permission
4Survey Says
- Moral beliefs correlates moderately with
- Illicit stimulant use ever (.27) and in the past
year (.22) - Marijuana use in past year (.39)
- Academic fraud (.21)
- Deviance/Crime (.44)
- Binge drinking (.29)
5Subcultural Theories
- ? Several Theories emerged from late 1950s
through the 1960s - ? Attempt to explain the formation and activity
of delinquent subcultures - ? Subculture defined as a group (such as a street
gang) that holds different norms and values than
mainstream society - Combined ideas from both strain theory (Merton)
and differential association (Sutherland) gt
mixed models
6Specific Subcultural Theories
- 1. Status frustration (Cohen)
- 2. Differential opportunity theory (Cloward and
Ohlin) - 3. Focal concerns of the lower class (Miller)
- In the interests of time and student sanity,
well just discuss Cloward and Ohlin as one
example. This will be the only one to appear on
the exam.
7Differential Opportunity Theory
- ? Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin
- ? From Merton Lack of legitimate opportunities
for success causes strain - ? Blocked economic aspirations lead to poor
self-image - ? Frustration leads to delinquency
- From Sutherland much delinquency requires access
to illegitimate means for success - Delinquents learn criminal trades within
neighborhood
8Differential Opportunity Theory (2 of 2)
- ? Delinquent subcultures
- ? Criminal subculture
- ? Where illegitimate opportunities exist,
delinquents seek economic gain, view crime as a
career - ? Conflict subculture
- ? Where no illegitimate opportunities exist,
gangs fight over turf and place high value on
violence - ? Retreatist subculture
- ? Double losers Emphasizes drug abuse or other
forms of escape
9Subcultural Theory Criticism
- ? Narrow scope
- ? Focus on lower-class boys
- ? Does not account for white-collar crime,
middle-class crime, or female offending - ? Are gangs are truly subcultures?
- ? Assumes almost perfect socialization to gang
10Control Theories
- Control shorthand for informal social control
- Theories covered
- Hirschi (social bonds)
- Gottfredson and Hirschi (low self-control)
- Sampson and Laub (age graded social control)
11Assumptions about Motivation towards crime
- Strain theory motivation from some sort of
strain (e.g. blocked opportunity) - Learning theory motivation from delinquent peers
or other learning experience - Critique if all crime is learned, where does
it originate? - Control theory there is enough natural
motivation towards crime - No need to build in extra motivation
- Real question? Why arent we all criminal?
12Types of Control
- Direct Control
- Direct punishments, rewards from parents, friends
- Indirect Control
- Refrain from deviance because you dont want to
risk friends, job, etc. - Internal Control
- Good self-concept, self-control, conscience
13Walter Reckless Containment Theory as precursor
to control theories
Inner (Good self
concept) Containment
- Outer Containment
- parents/school
- supervision
- Pushes and Pulls
- poverty, anger,delinquent
- subculture
DELINQUENCY OUT HERE !!!!!!
14ENTER TRAVIS HIRSCHI
- Causes of Delinquency (1969)
- Was an attack on other theories as much as a
statement of his theory - ORGANIZED theory into strain/anomie, learning,
and control - Criticism/attack on the other traditions and
support for control - Self-report data (CA high schools)
- Measures from competing theories
- This book was the first of its kind!
15Social Bond Theory
- Bond indicates Indirect Control
- Direct controls (punishment, reinforcement) less
important because delinquency occurs when out of
parents reach (adolescence). - Attachment
- Commitment (Elements of the social bond
- Involvement are all related to each other)
- Belief
16Or, Put Another Way
The Social Bond Attachment Commitment Involvement
Belief
Crime Fun, thrilling, quick and easy
satisfaction of desires
17Hirschis Evidence in Favor of Bonds
- Attachment
- Attachment to parents (wish to emulate, identify
with) - Commitment
- Grades, educational aspirations
- Belief
- Techniques of Neutralizations
18Criticisms of Hirschis Theory
- Delinquents do form relationships (not cold and
brittle). - Attachment to delinquent peers or parents
increases, rather than decreases delinquency - Which comes first, bonds or delinquency?
- Bonds more salient for females, and early in
adolescence. Not strongly related to crime.
19Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990)
- A General Theory of Crime
- Same control theory assumptions
- If we are all inclined to be deviant, why
conform? - Because most of us develop self-control
- Internal control
- Developed by age 8, as the result of direct
control from parents
20Nature of Crime, Nature of Low Self-Control
People with low self-control are
therefore Impulsive Risk-taking Physical (as
opposed to mental) Low verbal ability
Short-sighted Insensitive
Criminal Acts Provide immediate gratification
of desires Are risky/thrilling Are
easy/simple Require little skill/planning Provide
few/meager long term benefits Result in
pain/discomfort to a victim
21The implications of low self-control
- Explains stability of criminal behavior
- But, how does it explain aging out?
- Explains all crime and analogous behaviors
- Analogous same nature as criminal acts
22Empirical Support
- Moderate relationship between low self-control
and both crime and analogous behaviors - Holds for both males and females
- BUT
- Not the sole cause of crime
- May not explain white collar crime at all
23Stimulant Survey and LSC
How much do you agree wit h the following.
I am good at resisting temptationg
I have a hard time breaking bad habits
I am lazy
I say inappropriate things
I do certain things that are bad for me if they are fun
I refuse things that are bad for meg
I wish I had more self-discipline
People would say that I have iron self-disciplineg
Pleasure and fun sometimes keep me from getting work done
I have trouble concentrating
I am able to work effectively toward long-term goalsg
Sometimes I cant stop myself from doing something, even if I know it is wrong
24Survey Says
- Low Self-Control predicted (fairly well)
- Illicit stimulant use ever (.25) and in the past
year (.19) - Marijuana use in past year (.33)
- Academic fraud (.22)
- Deviance/Crime (.41)
- Binge drinking (.33)
25Age Graded Theory of Informal Social Control
- Sampson and Laub
- We will cover this again in the lifecourse
theory section - Takes Hirschis (1969) theory and made it age
graded - The specific elements of the social bond change
over the life-course - Also includes elements of direct control
- Also throws in some other stuff (integrated
theory)
26Sampson and Laub
Childhood Adolescence Adulthood
- Parenting
- Supervision
- Discipline
- Social Bonds
- Family
- School
- Delinquent Peers
Context
Delinquency
Adult Crime
Individual Differences
- Social Bonds
- Marriage
- Good Job
Length of Incarceration
27Policy Implications
- Hirschis Social Bond Theory
- Target attachment, commitment, belief
- Gottfredson and Hirschis General Theory
- Must focus on early childhood prevention
- Train parents?
- Sampson and Laub
- Different targets for different ages
- Importance of adult bonds (job, marriage)