Mutiple Faults: Modeling, Simulation and Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mutiple Faults: Modeling, Simulation and Test

Description:

Mutiple Faults: Modeling, Simulation and Test Yong C. Kim University of Wisconsin, Dept. of ECE, Madison, WI 53706, USA kimy_at_ece.wisc.edu Vishwani D. Agrawal – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Testc150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mutiple Faults: Modeling, Simulation and Test


1
Mutiple Faults Modeling, Simulation and Test
  • Yong C. Kim
  • University of Wisconsin, Dept. of ECE, Madison,
    WI 53706, USA
  • kimy_at_ece.wisc.edu
  • Vishwani D. Agrawal
  • Agere Systems, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USA
  • va_at_agere.com
  • Kewal K. Saluja
  • University of Wisconsin, Dept. of ECE, Madison,
    WI 53706, USA
  • saluja_at_engr.wisc.edu

2
Problem Statement
  • ATPG targets single stuck-at faults
  • Efficient simulation and ATPG programs are
    available for single faults.
  • Some applications require a limited capability to
    selectively target multiple faults
  • Combinational ATPG for partial scan Kim, et al.,
    VLSI Design01, ITC02.
  • Fault diagnosis.
  • Circuit optimization by redundancy removal.
  • Bridging faults.
  • Problem To find a test for a multiple stuck-at
    fault using a single-fault ATPG procedure.

3
Talk Outline
  • Background
  • A single fault model for multiple faults
  • Applications
  • Combinational ATPG for acyclic sequential
    circuits
  • Exclusive test for diagnosis
  • Conclusion
  • Other applications

4
Background
  • Number of multiple stuck-at faults in a k line
    circuit is 3k-1.
  • Single-fault tests are found to cover most
    multiple faults
  • Agarwal and Fung, IEEETC81
  • Hughes and McCluskey, ITC86
  • Jacob and Biswas, ITC88
  • Multiple-fault ATPG algorithms are not
    fault-oriented
  • Bossen and Hong, IEEETC71
  • Kohavi and Kohavi, IEEETC72
  • Aboulhamid, et al., JETTA93

5
An Obvious Fault Model
s-a-1
New PI fixed at 0
s-a-1
A
a
a
A
s-a-0
b
B
B
b
s-a-0
c
C
C
c
  • Fault is always active in the model even when it
    is not activated, e.g., a1, b0, c0.
  • Some simulators and ATPG programs may not
    properly handle fixed logic signals.

6
A New Single Fault Model
  • Insert a two-input in-line gate in each faulty
    line
  • AND for s-a-0 fault
  • OR for s-a1 fault
  • Insert an AND gate with output s-a-1 fault

s-a-1
s-a-1
A
a
a
A
s-a-0
b
B
B
b
s-a-0
c
C
C
c
7
Proof of Correctness
  • Fault-free circuit
  • A a a b c a
  • B b ( a b c ) b
  • C c ( a b c ) c

A
a
a
A
b
B
B
b
c
C
C
c
8
Proof of Correctness
  • Faulty circuit
  • A a 1 1
  • B b . 0 0
  • C c . 0 0

s-a-1
s-a-1
A
a
a
A
s-a-0
b
B
B
b
s-a-0
c
C
C
c
9
Size of Model
  • Model of a multiple fault of multiplicity n
    requires at most n3 modeling gates.

s-a-1
s-a-1
A
a
a
A
s-a-0
b
B
B
b
s-a-0
c
C
C
c
10
Comb. ATPG for Seq. Circuits
  • Single-fault tests for acyclic sequential
    circuits can be obtained by combinational ATPG.
  • Kim, et al., VLSI Design01, ITC01.
  • A combinational model is made for the sequential
    circuit.
  • About 83 of sequential circuit faults map onto
    single faults in the combinational model.
  • On an average about 17 of sequential circuit
    faults map onto multiple faults in the
    combinational model.
  • The method allows 100 fault efficiency.
  • General sequential circuits can be made acyclic
    by partial scan Cheng and Agrawal, IEEETC90.

11
An Example
Unbalanced nodes
a
s-a-0
s-a-0
b
FF
dseq 1
Combinational vector
Balanced model
Single fault
0
a1
s-a-0
s-a-0
0
1
X
1/0
b1
Multiple fault
1
a0
s-a-0
1/0
1/0
1
FF replaced by buffer
b0
Test sequence 11, 0X
12
Acyclic Partial-Scan ISCAS89 Circuits
13
Acyclic Partial-Scan ISCAS89 Circuits Test
Generation
FC cov. (), FE efficiency (), TGT CPU s Sun
Ultra 10 Gentest for seq. and TetraMAX for comb.
ATPG (Hitec produced equivalent FC, FE and TGT
within 10 of Gentest)
14
Exclusive Test
  • Given two faults, an exclusive test detects one
    fault but does not detect the other.
  • A test for the multiple fault (f1,f2) in the
    following circuit is an exclusive test for f1 and
    f2 in CUT.

CUT with f1
Exclusive test vector
0/1 or 1/0
CUT with f2
15
Diagnostic Test Example
Fault a1 b1 c0 c1 d1 f1 g0 h0 i0 i1
Test syndrome 10100 00010 00101 01010 00010 00100
00001 01000 01001 10110
Diagnostic number 5 8 20 10 8 4 16 2 18 13
a
g
d
i
s-a-1
s-a-1
b
c
h
e
f
100 coverage Tests
a 00011 b 01100 c 10101
16
Exclusive Test for b1 and d1
0
a
g
CUT with b1
d
i
0
b
0
h
c
e
f
0/1
s-a-1
g
d
i
CUT with d1
h
e
f
17
Diagnosis With Exclusive Test
Fault a1 b1 c0 c1 d1 f1 g0 h0 i0 i1
Test syndrome 101000 000101 001010 010100 000100 0
01000 000010 010000 010010 101101
Diagnostic number 5 40 20 10 8 4 16 2 18 45
a
g
d
i
s-a-1
s-a-1
b
c
h
e
f
100 coverage tests and excl. test
a 000110 b 011000 c 101010
18
Conclusion
  • Single fault model allows effective use of
    existing single-fault ATPG and simulation tools
    to handle multiple fault.
  • Applications include
  • Combinational ATPG for sequential circuits
  • Circuit optimization by removing multiple fault
    redundancies (see this paper)
  • Improving diagnostics by exclusive tests
  • Other types of tests like antitest and concurrent
    test (unpublished)
  • The modeling technique is useful for non-stuck
    type of faults that map onto multiple stuck-at
    faults, e.g., bridging faults (see this paper).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com