Title: UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on transborder higher education
1UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on transborder higher
education
- Brussels October 26 2005
- Counsellor Jan S. Levy
2Types of cross-border education activities
3There is a need for an educational response
- What should we achieve?
- Learners need to be protected from the risks of
misinformation, low-quality provision and
qualifications of limited validity - Qualifications should be readable and transparent
in order to increase their international validity
and portability - Qualifications should be recognised
internationally with as few difficulties as
possible - National quality assurance and accreditation
agencies need to intensify their international
cooperation in order to increase their mutual
understanding
4The educational response (2)
- Who should take responsibility of the response?
- Organisations with high degree of legitimacy in
the world of education - Global organisations, encompassing governments
and stakeholders - UNESCO and OECD joining forces
- Soft laws
- Legal instruments
5The educational response (3)
- How could it be implemented?
- Developing guidelines on quality provision in
higher education - Governments
- Higher education institutions
- Quality assurance and accreditation agencies
- Student bodies
- Information centres of recognition
- Professional bodies
- Development of reliable information tools for
learners/students/institutions - Global Database on nationally approved
providers/provision
6Status
- Working group open to all OECD/UNESCO members and
stakeholders - One set of guidelines agreed upon in March - but
two different decisions - OECD in April agreed to aiming at a Council
decision by the end of this year. - UNESCO procedures did not permit adoption by this
years General Conference. Guidelines are being
issued as a secretariat document and as such
distributed to the 190 member countries of UNESCO
7Status
- Even if the guidelines will have different status
in the two organisations, they have been issued
with the stamp of two major international
organisations, and could be looked upon as a
global reference for cross-border higher
education. - Example Nigeria informed GC that they already
have presented the guidelines for parliament as
the rules that should be followed in their
country.
8Guidelines for Governments
- They should establish or encourage the
establishment of a comprehensive, fair and
transparent system of registration or licensing
for CBHE providers wishing to operate in their
territory - Comprehensive capacity for reliable QA and
accreditation of CBHE - Provide accurate and easily accessible
information on criteria and standards for
registration etc. - Develop or encourage bilateral or multilateral
recognition agreements
9Guidelines for HE institutions/providers
- Underlining that staff contributions are
indispensable for institutions commitment to
quality - Ensure that the programmes they deliver across
borders and in their home country are of
comparable quality - Institutions should take into account the UNESCO
recommendation concerning the Status of HE
Teaching Personnel.
10Guidelines for HE institutions/providers (contd.)
- Take full responsibility for information and
guidance when using agents to promote their
programmes - Respect QA systems in receiving countries,
including when delivering distance education - Use Codes of good practice when relevant
- Ensure financial transparency
11Guidelines for student bodies
- Student bodies bear the responsibility of helping
students and potential students to carefully
scrutinise information available - The emergence of autonomous student bodies should
be encouraged and supported, so that student
bodies - Can be involved as active partners at
international, national and institutional levels
in the development, monitoring and maintenance of
quality provision - Increase students awareness of potential risks
such as misleading guidance and information - Establish list of relevant questions to be asked
by students enrolling in CBHE.
12Guidelines for QA and accreditation bodies
- Ensure that their work include CP provision in
its various modes - Sustain and strengthen the existing regional and
international networks or establish regional
networks - Strengthen collaboration between the bodies of
the sending and the receiving country - Provide accurate and easily accessible
information on the assessment standards,
procedures and effects of their mechanisms.
13Guidelines for academic recognition bodies
- Underline the importance of the regional
conventions - Establish and maintain regional and international
networks - Strengthen co-operation with QA bodies
- Use codes of good practice for assessment of
qualifications
14Guidelines for professional bodies
- Develop information channels accessible both to
national and foreign holders of qualifications. - Establish and maintain contacts between
professional bodies of both sending and receiving
countries and other stakeholders to improve
qualification assessment methodologies. - Establish, develop and implement criteria and
procedures for comparing programmes and
qualifications