Public Service Amendment Bill - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Public Service Amendment Bill

Description:

Title: Government employees medical aid Author: Eugene Watson Last modified by: PC 10 Created Date: 5/27/2004 9:10:12 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Eugen130
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Service Amendment Bill


1
  • Public Service Amendment Bill
  • B31-2006
  • Presentation to
  • Select Committee on Local Government and
    Administration, NCOP
  • 5 June 2007

1
2
OBJECTIVES OF AMENDMENT BILL (1)
  • Main purpose to strengthen organisational human
    resource matters in public service
  • Legislation for a single public service dealing
    with 3 spheres of government underway envisaged
    to be introduced in Parliament in 2008
  • Likely date of commencement of Single Public
    Service Act is 2009
  • Considered necessary to strengthen the Public
    Service Act urgently in some areas

3
OBJECTIVES OF AMENDMENT BILL (2)
  • Experience has shown that some organisational
    human resource arrangements in Public Service Act
    directly hampers internal efficiency and service
    delivery. These include-
  • Inadequate provision for deployment of staff
  • Some functions provided through
  • departments not close to service delivery point
    without direct accountability decision-making
    by functionaries tasked with delivery or
  • entities outside public service without direct
    control by political head

4
OBJECTIVES OF AMENDMENT BILL (3)
  • Public Service Act prescripts often not adhered
    to, resulting in weak organisational and HR
    practices legal disputes
  • Transgressing employees resign and join other
    departments without being disciplined
  • Employees dismissed for misconduct, even related
    to corruption, may be re-employed
  • Some provisions have resulted in legal disputes,
    while others are obsolete, overly complex or
    conflict with other legislation

5
DEFINITIONS
  • Definition section replaced (cl 1), e.g.
  • executive authority instead of executing
    authority
  • Def. employment practice inserted
  • Def. of sector members (SAPS, SANDF, Educators,
    Correctional Services, Intelligence Services
    clarified
  • Def. of salary level and salary scale clarified

5
6
POWERS OF MINISTER
  • Minister for Public Service Administration
    (MPSA) enabled to apply, after consultation with
    other Ministers in question, any condition of
    service to educators/ SAPS/Correctional Services
  • Aim to obtain, where desirable, greater
    alignment in conditions of service of general
    public service mentioned sectors (cl 2)
  • Setting of norms standards and other functions
    of MPSA clarified (cl 2)
  • Also power to establish advisory/consultative
    body iro functions of MPSA

7
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
  • NB Existing provision - exercise of all powers by
    MPSA are subject to collective bargaining on
    matters of mutual interest only clarified (cl
    7(a) and (b) section 5(4) and 5(5))
  • Collective bargaining takes place in Public
    Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC)
    relevant sectoral bargaining council
  • Collective agreements concluded iro employees
    falling under Public Service Act to be regarded
    as Ministerial determinations to enhance
    implementation compliance (cl 7)

7
8
PROMOTIONS IN PUBLICSERVICE
  • All SMS posts must be advertised outside public
    service discretion to do same for other posts
    (open competition)
  • Currently, if existing employee applies for
    higher post in public service and is successful,
    he/she is regarded to be promoted
  • Definition of unfair labour practice in Labour
    Relations Act includes unfair conduct relating to
    promotion
  • Unsuccessful internal candidates may refer unfair
    labour practice disputes to bargaining council
    while external candidates cant
  • Proposed that internal candidates be placed in
    same position as external candidates, i.e.
    neither may declare unfair labour practice
    dispute
  • References in Public Service Act to promotion
    omitted (e.g. cl 14)
  • NB Remedies under Employment Equity Act (unfair
    discrimination) Administrative Justice Act
    (fair administrative action) will still be
    available to both internal external candidates

9
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Current institutions under Public Service Act
  • National departments and Offices of Premier
    Schedule 1
  • Provincial departments Schedule 2
  • Organisational components Schedule 3
  • These institutions may be established
    disestablished by President by proclamation in
    Gazette internal organisation of public service

9
10
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • New organisational form, government agencies
    within public service proposed
  • Based on proposals by National Treasury DPSA
    following review of national public entities
  • Head of agency to report directly to relevant
    executive authority (Minister/Premier/MEC) head
    is also accounting officer of agency
  • Each agency to have principal department to
    assist executive authority with oversight (cls 9
    10)

11
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Agencies to be part of public service Public
    Service Act all its prescripts, apply to
    organisation governance of these agencies as
    well as its staff
  • Staff are public service employees, e.g.
    appointed in terms of Public Service Act
  • Matters of mutual interest subject to collective
    bargaining in Public Service Co-ordinating
    Bargaining Council (PSCBC) relevant sectoral
    bargaining council
  • Agency is a body created in terms of the Public
    Service Act like a national or provincial
    department

12
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Agency may have original/assigned/delegated
    statutory functions
  • Original legislation conferring functions
    directly on head of agency
  • Assigned functions conferred on executive
    authority or official of principal department by
    national legislation may be assigned to head of
    agency in terms of Amendment Bill
  • Delegated functions conferred on executive
    authority or head of principal department
    delegated to head of agency
  • Difference between assigned delegated functions
  • Functionary delegating remains accountable
  • Functionary assigning, no longer accountable, but
    head becomes accountable

13
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Since Parliament by legislation conferred
    particular functions on a functionary, it is
    proposed in Bill that
  • a Minister may only assign such functions to head
    of a government agency with Parliaments approval
  • Such assignment must be done by notice in Gazette

14
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Government agencies to be listed in Schedule 3
    together with principal department
  • First proposed agency is Centre for Public
    Service Innovation having Department of Public
    Service and Administration as its principal
    department
  • Apart from different designations, currently no
    difference between Schedules 1 3 bodies (cl 38)
  • Current Schedule 3 organisational components
    (Independent Complaints Directorate, Intelligence
    Academy Inspectorate for Social Assistance)
    proposed to be moved to Schedule 1

15
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • How is an agency created
  • President may, by proclamation, establish-
  • national agency on a national Ministers request
    and advice of Minister of Finance Minister for
    Public Service Administration (MPSA)
  • provincial agency on a Premiers request, after
    consultation with Minister of Finance MPSA

16
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • For each government agency, a notice in Gazette
    must
  • Must list relevant original functions of its head
  • Must refer to notice/s on assigned functions
  • May list delegated functions
  • Must determine reporting requirements to head of
    principal department to enable head to assist
    executive authority with oversight on policy
    implementation, performance, integrated planning,
    budgeting service delivery
  • May include administrative or operational matters
  • May establish advisory or consultative board
    without executive functions for agency

17
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • Main differences between departments and
    government agencies
  • Government agency would be body established to
    perform specific functions
  • Unlike departments, an agency would not have core
    policy development function
  • Unlike most departments, agency may have assigned
    functions with accompanying direct accountability
  • A government agency is to be partnered with
    department which must assist executive authority
    with oversight in respect of policy
    implementation
  • Contrary to department, agency may have advisory
    or consultative board
  • Mechanism to bring back to public service
    institutions outside public service which have
    functions that should be performed by
    institutions in public service

18
DEPLOYMENTS
  • Current Act allows transfer in public interest
    without employees consent or due process
  • In Bill provision for (a) transfers within public
    service and (b) secondments to and from public
    service
  • with employees consent
  • without employees consent but subject to due
    process (consider employees representations)
    public interest requirement
  • Express provision for continued employment
    despite transfer within public service or to
    public service from another organ of state (cls
    20, 21 22)
  • E.g. to retain pensionable service leave credits

18
19
ENHANCING COMPLIANCE
  • To improve compliance with Public Service Act,
    MPSA enabled to conduct investigations make
    binding decisions in event of contraventions
  • To avoid duplication, Public Service Commission
    is notified of investigations their outcome (cl
    7)
  • In addition-
  • executive authorities must discipline
    transgressing heads of department
  • heads of department must discipline transgressing
    employees in their departments
  • These transgressions to be reported to MPSA who
    is to report at least annually to relevant
    committees of national provincial legislatures
  • MPSA may also report transgressing national EAs
    to Cabinet provincial EAs to provincial
    Cabinets via Premiers
    (cl 24)

19
20
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Currently, head of department has power to
    dismiss employee for misconduct while
    disciplinary code provides chair at hearing
    pronounces sanction
  • Disciplinary code for employees
  • on levels 1 to 12 in collective agreement
  • on senior management level in ministerial
    determination, but similar to one in collective
    agreement

21
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Current process
  • Disciplinary hearing - employer appoints chair
    and also person to present employers case
  • Finding by chair if guilty, then pronounce
    sanction
  • Employees on levels 1-12 internal appeal SMS
    employees no internal appeal
  • Question If employee dont appeal or if no
    appeal, may head of department
  • amend finding, i.e. guilty to non-guilty or vice
    versa?
  • if guilty finding, amend sanction to lesser or
    harsher sanction?

22
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Since disciplinary hearing aims to ensure due
    process
  • propose in Bill that sanction imposed by chair of
    hearing must, subject to internal appeal (if
    any), be implemented by head of department
  • (new section 16B in cl 24)

22
23
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Reasons for proposal
  • Employer initiates/runs disciplinary process
  • Head of department appoints chair
  • Head is represented at hearing by employer
    representative to be mandated by head to make
    representations
  • Alignment with collective agreement protect
    sanctity thereof
  • Ensure fair procedure protect independence of
    chair

24
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Should provision be made for review by head of
    department?
  • Labour Relations Act does not require internal
    appeal/review
  • Review will delay process which already often
    takes to long
  • Employee remains on payroll pending internal
    review
  • Amounts to review of heads own decision
    (appointed chair to make decision on his/her
    behalf) tantamount to double jeopardy

25
IMPLEMENTING DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS
  • Should provision be made for review by head of
    department (cont)?
  • Review decision of head of department, as
    administrative decision, could be challenged ito
    Administrative Justice Act (in addition to Labour
    Relations Act)
  • If findings of some chairs are considered
    problematic, it should be addressed through
    training and guidelines to ensure competent
    persons as chairs
  • Sometimes departments charge employees not
    performing with misconduct instead of following
    more protracted poor performance procedure

26
CONTINUATION OF DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS IN NEW
DEPARTMENT
  • Provision made for institution/continuation of
    disciplinary hearing by new department iro
    alleged misconduct by employee at his/her former
    department
  • New head may do so or, if requested by former
    head, must do so
  • Two departments must co-operate, e.g.
  • Exchange documents
  • Furnish written oral evidence
  • (new section 16B(4) (5) in cl 24)

27
SUMMONING WITNESSES
  • MPSA empowered to make regulations on-
  • power for chairs of disciplinary hearings to
    summon employees other persons
  • travel, subsistence other costs for witnesses
    at disciplinary hearings
  • (new section 16B(3) in cl 24)

28
GROUNDS OF DISMISSAL
  • Grounds for dismissal aligned with those
    recognised under Labour Relations Act, i.e.
  • Misconduct
  • incapacity due to poor performance
  • ill health
  • operational requirements
  • (new section 17(2) in cl 25)

29
ABSCONDMENT
  • Abscondment provisions revised (new section 17(3)
    in cl 25)
  • Period of absence reduced from one calendar month
    to 10 working days educators 14 days
  • Deemed resignation to exclude applicability of
    disciplinary procedures
  • However, re-instatement procedure retained
  • Accords with Supreme Court of Appeal judgment,
    Phenithi v Min of Eductaion Others 2006 9
    BLLR 821 (SCA) iro similar provision in
    Employment of Educators Act
  • Dismissal by operation of law. Not in conflict
    with LRA and Constitution because hearing not
    totally excluded (i.e. re-instatement procedure).
    Objectives are reasonable justifiable

30
SUPERVENING IMPOSSIBILITY
  • Provision for supervening impossibility
  • If employee is unable to fulfill terms of
    contract for reasons other than poor
    performance/ill health, e.g. long imprisonment
    (period to be prescribed)
  • contract automatically terminates
  • employee is deemed to have resigned
  • However, also provision for re-instatement
    procedure
  • (new section 17(5) in cl 25)

31
PROHIBITION ON RE-EMPLOYMENT IF DISMISSED FOR
MISCONDUCT
  • Prohibition on re-employment in public service
    for prescribed period of employees dismissed for
    prescribed categories of misconduct
  • Emphasize misconduct corrupt related misconduct
  • Different periods may be prescribed by regulation
    for different categories of misconduct
  • One/more categories of misconduct may have no
    prescribed period, i.e. therefore no prohibition
    on re-employment
  • (new section 17(4) in cl 25)

31
32
OUTSIDEREMUNERATIVE WORK
  • Proposed omission of current requirement that
    employee must place whole of his/her time at
    States disposal
  • This is to accord with BCEA
  • Propose inclusion of criteria for granting/
    non-granting of approval for outside remunerative
    work, i.e. whether it would
  • interfere with or impede effective/efficient
    performance of work
  • constitute contravention of code of conduct, e.g.
    conflict of interest (cl 26)

33
GRIEVANCES
  • Currently employees grievances must be attempted
    to be resolved within department, including
    referral to relevant Minister/Premier/ MEC, and
    only then referred to Public Service Commission
    (PSC)
  • If head of department has grievance most likely
    to be about his/her Minister/Premier/MEC
  • Therefore proposed that heads of department be
    allowed to submit grievances directly to PSC
  • Employees, except heads, to first exhaust
    grievance procedure within department before
    referring labour disputes to bargaining council
    (cl 31)

33
34
POLITICAL RIGHTS
  • Provisions iro political rights of employees
    omitted dealt with in Constitution
    limitations in code of conduct (current section
    36)
  • Candidatures of employees for legislatures are
    proposed to be regulated in Public Service Act
    (cl 32)
  • May be candidates subject to prescribed
    conditions
  • Only deemed to have resigned from date assuming
    duty

35
REGULATION-MAKING POWERS
  • Regulation-making powers aligned with areas that
    norms standards may be determined also
    simplified
  • Currently, authorises making of regulation for
    deviations for regulations
  • No provision for retrospective effect for
    deviations
  • Propose provision for this, but only if in the
    public interest and not to regulations, not
    collective agreements, regulating matters of
    mutual interest, permitted
  • (cl 35)

35
36
DELEGATION POWERS
  • Currently, Public Service Act only expressly
    authorises executive authority to delegate
    certain functions
  • Similar to PFMA, propose comprehensive provision
    for delegation of all functions vested by Act or
    regulations in-
  • executive authority
  • head of department
  • Conditions may be imposed when delegating
    functions
  • Though delegated, original functionary remains
    accountable for how functions are exercised
  • Delegated functions may still be exercised by
    original functionary
  • Delegations may be withdrawn (cl 37)

37
Siyabonga/Ri a livhuwa/Re a leboga/Dankie/Thank
you
37
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com