COMMON%20INTERFACE%20FOR%20EMBEDDED%20SOFTWARE%20CONFIGURATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

COMMON%20INTERFACE%20FOR%20EMBEDDED%20SOFTWARE%20CONFIGURATION

Description:

Title: COMMON INTERFACE FOR EMBEDDED SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION Author: Yatiraj Bhumkar Last modified by: Yatiraj Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Yati81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMMON%20INTERFACE%20FOR%20EMBEDDED%20SOFTWARE%20CONFIGURATION


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • Expensive hardware increases overall cost.
  • Lesser degree of scalability.
  • Most of the visible hardware is required to
    control the invisible hardware or software.

Purchased in 1970 by UNT, the IBM 360/50 CPU was
acquired to support academic and administrative
computing. The original configuration of the
360/50 was one multiplexer channel, one selector
channel, 256K core memory, a 1403 line printer, a
2540 card reader/punch, three 30KB tape drives,
and five 2314 single density disk drives. The
original operating system was OS/MFT/HASP
supporting a maximum of three user partitions.
3
(No Transcript)
4
  • With the help of one web server and several web
    pages per software, we can configure all hardware
    and software at no extra hardware cost.
  • Very high degree of scalability.

5
Common Gateway Interface (CGI)
  • CGI as a separate process hampers optimization
    goals static resources (PCB), run-time resource
    (context switching time).
  • Several web pages of several different software
    and hardware and their corresponding CGI
    executables make management clumsy, wastage of
    file-system space.

6
Solutions to CGI drawbacks
  • Fast CGI
  • Intelligent approach to save spawning of separate
    process PER request.
  • Similar kind of requests are serviced by one
    process each.
  • The process keeps running listening for other
    such requests.
  • Wastage of resources.
  • Ad hoc intelligence reduces scalability
  • In-process CGI
  • Once a CGI process is spawned, it converts all
    function calls into inline functions.
  • Reduces the overhead of function calls.
  • Greater image size because of inline functions.
  • It still spawns a separate process per request.
  • CGI threads
  • Spawn a separate THREAD instead of Process.
  • Spawning of threads still incurs context
    switching.
  • For Linux, threads and processes are one and the
    same at kernel-level.

7
My approach of CGI
  • CGI as function call
  • Instead of spawning process or thread, if CGI can
    be called as a function, it would save enormous
    amount of resources.

8
Advantages of CGI Function
  • No spawning of process, no context switching.
  • Saves memory and other critical resources,
    improves overall speed and performance.
  • No inline functions involved, maintaining small
    web server footprint.
  • Same interface with web server as normal CGI
    process.
  • Migration from CGI process to CGI function is
    easy.

9
Drawbacks of CGI Function
  • Allows code isolation but NO execution isolation
    from web server. If CGI function crashes, whole
    web server crashes.
  • Sequential execution so the web server has to
    wait for the CGI function to finish.

10
Future Extensions
Questions Please!!!
  • Universal file manipulation library
  • XML parsing tool.
  • Configuration on the fly
  • Software restarts to read from configuration file
    , entails Unaffordable downtime.
  • Software should export functions that are
    dynamically linked with web server.
  • These functions change the variable values on the
    fly.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com