Zen Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Zen Review

Description:

Daoist contributions to Zen/Chan Get rid of desire by forgetting words/concepts Wu-wei and distinction of Nirvana-Samsara Model of total focus in Zhuangzi – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ChadH166
Category:
Tags: pragmatism | review | zen

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Zen Review


1
Zen Review
  • Daoist contributions to Zen/Chan ?
  • Get rid of desire by forgetting words/concepts
  • Wu-wei and distinction of Nirvana-Samsara
  • Model of total focus in Zhuangzi
  • Samurai, tea ceremony, Noh drama
  • Positive this life focusnot nirvana
  • But no further goalno distinction
  • Fung Yu-lans 5 beliefs
  • No truth, cultivation, change, Buddhism
  • Ordinary activities dao

2
Teaching Techniques
  • Distinctive and Confucian envy
  • Story-telling v theory
  • Shocking stories (no religious reverence for
    Buddha, Sutras, rituals, icons etc.
  • Illustrate focus on the moment/present here
  • Shock, spitting, beating, cutting, shouting
  • Wake up, dont thinklook, taste, feel
  • Koan Madyamika related to give up
  • Kick out of templewalking zen
  • Never tell too plainly
  • Creates more individual thought

3
Pragmatism 20th Century Science
  • Blends rationalism-reality with real-world
    practice
  • Social models of language/knowledge
  • Like/unlike China
  • Sentence and inference difference
  • Reality (Science) via practice
  • Evolutionary influence way of talking
  • Fitness along w/ species
  • Science a survival way of knowing
  • Knowing to, how and that
  • Relativity and Quantum mechanics

4
Belief as a Habit
  • Not internal picturesuccessful guide
  • Depends on conception of success
  • Peirce The first formulation
  • Doubt an irritation, believe smooth flow
  • Comfort and calmhow best to achieve it

5
Questions
  • Final Examination questions
  • Vote on test style

6
Practical Problem
  • How to achieve that comfort?
  • Fixed beliefs allow smooth, efficient action
  • Stability and "constancy"
  • Requires less of the "disruption" of doubt
  • Four candidates tenacity, authority, a priori,
    science/reality

7
Tenacity
  • Strength in durability
  • Just a strategy of never change your mind
  • Weakness in the social impulse
  • Makes it inconvenient to work with others
  • Natural tendency to argue

8
Authority
  • Strength in social impulse
  • Easy social sharingall believe the same thing
  • Weakness in durability
  • Change of thought leader change in belief
  • Social and economic disaster

9
A priori (Socratic Method)
  • Strength in lack of domination
  • Each person reasons for herself
  • Weakness in subjectivism
  • Reason requires coherence
  • As long as we do not contradict ourselves, we can
    believe different coherent theories
  • Turns out that very few belief systems are
    inconsistent
  • Familiar weakness of Socratic method

10
Reality (Science)
  • Social, but not coerced
  • Shared institutions of search for knowledge
  • Publication, common assumptions, current theory
  • Authority about chemistry but no authority to
    declare chemical laws
  • Durable but not stubborn
  • Method of disproof but believe until disproved
  • Rational but objective testing
  • Self-correcting we can use scientific method to
    evaluate particular methods

11
Real Emphasis Integrity
  • The only method with an ethic!
  • It matters if right or wrong
  • as opposed to stable, shared, and spontaneous
  • Truth as the final product of scientific inquiry
  • Not some match (correspondence) with reality
  • Emphasis on procedure, method, and long-run
    stability

12
American Triumvirate
  • Peirce, James, Dewey
  • James
  • Makes success of a belief personal and
    psychological
  • Founder of academic discipline of psychology
  • Religion, mysticism, moral beliefs
  • Will to believe and mortal decisions

13
Truth Is What Works (for You)
  • The successful idea
  • Test subjective
  • Makes you feel better to believe in god, free
    will, morality and so on
  • Peirce more idealistic about truth
  • Still a social productbut in the long run
  • Tension and pragmaticism

14
Dewey
  • Social, political issues
  • Education reform
  • Problem solving
  • Some at HKU now!
  • Stops talking about truth
  • Too abstract
  • Warranted assertability
  • What do the social norms of assertion require,
    allow and forbid saying?
  • Justification or warrant rest on social norms

15
Pragmatic Mix
  • Darwinism, Kant and utilitarianism
  • Mind structures reality
  • Darwinian context solves problems for the
    organism
  • Rationality is a product of evolution
  • Ways of solving problems that
  • Are compact enough to "fit in genes"
  • Successful general strategies given how the world
    is

16
Inquiry
  • Constructs a Kantian world that works
  • Change when it doesn't
  • Survival determining, but lots of room for
    selection
  • Hence also utilitarian
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • In the extreme has survival consequences

17
Steps in Inquiry
  • Habit
  • Frustration
  • Doubt
  • Gathering information
  • Hypotheses
  • Testing
  • Return to action

18
Only "Practical" Doubt
  • Mind only "works" when habit is unsuccessful
  • Intellectually conservative
  • Accept scientific picture until disproof
  • Anti-Descartes
  • No abstract doubt
  • Evil demon makes knowledge impossible
  • May be mathematical, intellectual puzzles
  • But not "systematic" doubt

19
Neurath's Boat
  • Listing because of a leak
  • Repair at sea (we have to stay afloat while we
    fix our system)
  • Rely on the good side while we repair the broken
    plank
  • Might eventually repair the whole boat
  • No single plank is irreplaceable
  • No "fundamental belief"
  • Rely on other beliefs while correcting some
  • Might later correct those
  • As in Socratic method
  • Rely on other premises

20
Focus on Social Intelligence
  • Share information gather, store, access
  • Less tolerant of individual "success (James)
  • Science, logic and scientific method
  • Efficient storage, retrieval, testing
  • V apprentices, secret transmission, know-how
  • Social intelligence about ethics, crime,
    economics and so forth
  • Critical conformity
  • No authority but only doubt when a problem
  • Including theoretical problems

21
Social Emphasis
  • Interest in Marxism, China
  • Shared social focus
  • American "socialist"
  • Critical of Marxism but shared view of human
    social nature
  • Main divergence radical v ameliorative
  • Violent v liberallike Neurath's boat

22
"Classical Liberalism"
  • Conservative individualism
  • Shallow psychology of human nature
  • Atomistic, egoistic, base hedonistic, amoral
    individuals
  • Needing law to motivate moral behavior
  • Self-fulfilling prophecy
  • American character v. Chinese character
  • Our nature is shaped by culture and institutions

23
Classical Focus Wrong
  • Not question of individual v society
  • Question is how to blend nature culture
  • New liberalism
  • Way to justify liberty is that its institutions
    create free people
  • Self-critical, responsible, autonomous
  • Not something demanded by metaphysically free
    individuals

24
Democracy
  • Face to face discussion creates communal humans
  • Shared views
  • Mutual respect
  • Equality
  • Concern for community
  • Advocate democracy
  • To create self-governing, self-perfecting beings

25
Real Problems for Liberalism
  • Non-political/cultural factors inhibit moral
    growth
  • Even when politically free
  • Manipulative "free" institutions
  • Economic determinism
  • Songs and arts
  • Confucius on ?liritual and music

26
Manipulation
  • Television and advertising create artificial
    needs
  • Cars, fashions, perfumes, colognes, style
  • Related to songs and natural impulse
  • Cf. Laozi
  • Education for jobs
  • Free form of slavery
  • Sensationalist slaves
  • Educational system--teaches docility

27
Solution
  • Political involvement
  • People take real power over themselves
  • Set up institutions with that goal
  • Social intelligence
  • Value knowledge is like scientific
  • Social and coherent
  • Criticize some onlyno systematic value doubt

28
Philosophy for All
  • Reason in morals and in science
  • Social shared intelligence
  • We cannot choose not to philosophize
  • We choose do it well. . .
  • Or badly

29
Thank You
  • Please stay for a few minutes to complete the
    course evaluation
  • Good luck!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com