Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals In Your Employ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals In Your Employ

Description:

Created Date: 1/1/1980 5:00:00 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles: Arial Times New Roman Wingdings Arial Black BB ppt design Microsoft ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: bake67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals In Your Employ


1
Protecting Yourself From Rogues and Rascals
In Your Employ
When Vice-Principals, Employees, Agents and
Supervisors Go Astray
  • Kevin Sadler
  • kevin.sadler_at_bakerbotts.com512.322.2500

2
Employer Liability
  • Four Main Areas
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Vice-Principal Liability
  • Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
    Supervision
  • Quid Pro Quo -- Strict Liability for Supervisor's
    Sexual Harassment Conduct

3
Vicarious Liability
  • Employer may be held liable for its employee's
    tortuous acts if the act is
  • Within the scope of the employee's actual or
    apparent authority
  • In furtherance of the employer's business, and
  • For the accomplishment of the object for which
    the employee was employed
  • In other words, an employer is liable if the act
    fell
  • "Within the course and scope of employment"

4
Vicarious Liability
  • Course and Scope
  • Conduct must be of the same general nature as
    that authorized or incidental to the conduct
    authorized
  • Employer need not approve or authorize
  • In furtherance of employer's business
  • Turns on employer's ability to control employee
  • No Liability where employee's act furthers
    self-interest
  • Assault based on personal animosity
  • Personal gratification

5
Vice-Principal Liability
  • What is it?
  • The corporation or employer is liable because the
    actions taken by a vice-principal of a
    corporation are the acts of the corporation
    itself
  • Vice-principal's acts or omissions must
  • Bear a relation to,
  • or be referable to,
  • or further the employer's business

6
Vice-Principal Theory
  • Who are vice-principals?
  • corporate officers
  • those who have authority to hire, fire, and
    direct employees
  • those engaged in the performance of non-delegable
    or absolute duties
  • those who manage the whole or a department or
    division of business
  • In other words . . .
  • a vice-principal is a person who has the
    authority to hire, discharge, and direct
    employees of the corporation or who has the
    authority to manage the entire corporation or
    division of its business.

7
Vice-Principal Theory - Punitive Damages
  • The potential for punitive damages is what makes
    the vice-principal theory attractive to
    plaintiffs and their lawyers
  • the employer authorized the doing and the manner
    of the act
  • the employee was unfit and the employer was
    reckless in employing him,
  • the employee was employed in a managerial
    capacity and was acting in the scope of
    employment,
  • the employer ratified or approved the act

8
Vice-Principal Liability
  • Cases where punitive damages imposed
  • Purvis v. Prattco, Inc., 595 S.W.2d 103 (Tex.
    1980) Hotel ejection case. employer liable for
    the acts of its manager who ejected a family from
    a hotel
  • Wal-Mart v. Itz, 21 S.W.3d 456 (Tex.
    App.--Austin, 2000) Wal-Mart liable for its
    manager's assault of a sexual nature when he
    "ordered the plaintiff to a back room under a
    business pretext"
  • Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Tucker, 806
    S.W.2d 914 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1991, writ
    dim'd w.o.j) employer liable for slander when
    senior vice-president was considered a
    vice-principal and authorized to make statements
    about a former employee.

9
Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
  • What is it?
  • Arises directly from the employer's conduct
  • Plaintiff must show that
  • Employer owed her a duty
  • Employer breached that duty
  • Breach proximately caused her damages

10
Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
  • Duty
  • Duty arises because of the special relationship
    that exists between the parties.
  • E.g., between the employer and the employee
  • Employer-employee relationship creates a duty to
    a third party only if the third party's harm is
    the result of the wrongdoer's employment.
  • No Duty if
  • Individual bears no relation to the employer's
    business, OR
  • Injury cannot be traced back to the fact of the
    wrongdoer's employment

11
Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
  • FORESEEABILITY
  • Plaintiff must establish that his injuries were
    brought about by the reason of the employment of
    the incompetent employee
  • Without this connection, "an employer would
    essentially be an insurer of the safety of every
    person who happens to come into contact with his
    employee simply because of his status as an
    employee."

12
Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
  • Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. v. Ianni
  • Facts A crew member for Loram Maintenance was
    strung out on crystal methamphetamines, left the
    job site and shot and injured a police officer
    that approached him while he had an argument with
    his wife
  • 800,000 actual damages
  • 500,000 punitive damages

13
Negligent Hiring, Training, Retention, and
Supervision
  • El Paso Court of Appeals upheld judgment because
  • supervisors knew of rogue employee's pervasive
    drug use (and rest of crew's)
  • prior incident where field clerk had told
    employee to go to next job site after he attacked
    another crew member's wife was "some asserted
    control" over employee

14
Supervisors Sexual Harassment
  • Strict Liability -- Quid Pro Quo
  • Something for something
  • Job benefit or detriment is conditioned on
    submission to sexual advances
  • Hostile Work Environment
  • Conduct that alters the conditions of employment
    and creates an intimidating or offensive
    environment

15
The Rules
  • Supervisors
  • supervisor harassment tangible detriment
  • AUTOMATIC LIABILITY

supervisor no tangible good victim fails
to harassment detriment policy utilize
policy
NO LIABILITY
16
Reasonable Care to Prevent and Correct Harassment
  • What is reasonable care?
  • 1. Effective and effectual anti-harassment
    policy
  • 2. Prompt, thorough investigation
  • 3. Specific, tangible action designed to stop
    harassment
  • What is not reasonable care?
  • 1. Failing to adopt/enforce anti-harassment
    policy
  • 2. Failing to investigate timely, or at all
  • 3. No record of action

17
Practical Tips To Avoid/Minimize Liability
  • Communication and Training
  • Appropriate Complaint and Investigation
    Procedures
  • Open Door Policy with Human resources
  • Limit Authority of Vice-Principals, Supervisors,
    and Managers

18
Communication and Training
  • Make sure employees aware of company policies
  • Periodic Reminder Training
  • Make sure that supervisors and managers are aware
    and routinely reminded of their
  • obligations under the law
  • company policies regarding harassment,
    discipline, and investigation
  • Train management about
  • their authority
  • how to deal appropriately with employees

19
Investigation and Corrective Action
  • When employee reports misconduct of a fellow
    employee or supervisor, employer MUST
  • Investigate claim
  • Take appropriate action such as
  • counseling, sensitivity training
  • corrective measures, disciplinary action
  • punishment
  • demotion
  • termination
  • Not appropriate to
  • ignore
  • suggest employee's talk it out
  • respond that "boys will be boys" or "that's just
    Bob"

20
Open Door Policy
  • Make sure
  • Human Resources has open door policy for
    employees
  • Have more than one channel for employee's to
    report misconduct or lodge complaints
  • Treat complaints against vice-principals,
    supervisors, managers, and other high-ranking
    officials just as seriously as those against
    "rank and file" employees

21
Limit Authority
  • Avoid granting too much authority to supervisors
  • Limit supervisor's authority to make ultimate
    employment decisions, i.e., hiring, firing,
    without
  • prior approval from higher management
  • advice and consent from Human Resources
  • Managers and Supervisors should be subject to
    same disciplinary procedures as other employees

22
Supervisors Should Know
  • Held to a higher standard
  • Discipline for ignoring harassment
  • Possible personal liability for ignoring
    harassment
  • Third party harassment
  • Must report all complaints
  • Duty to investigate if you have knowledge or
    should have knowledge that harassment may be
    taking place
  • No retaliation
  • Document everything
  • Confidentiality

23
www.bakerbotts.com
24

Kevin Sadler kevin.sadler_at_bakerbotts.com512.322.2
500
www.bakerbotts.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com