Personal Identity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Personal Identity

Description:

personal identity – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:361
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: word1036
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Personal Identity


1
Personal Identity
2
What is personal identity
  • Am I the same person as I was when I was born?
    when I was a child? ten years ago? yesterday?
  • Is there a single self linking all these person
    stages, or are there just a succession of
    selves?
  • What kind of adventures could a person undergo
    without losing their identity? E.g. total
    amnesia, brainwashing, brain implants (remember
    the cyborg question?), brain transplant,
    teleportation?

3
Numerical identity vs. qualitative identity
  • Qualitative identity two objects have exactly
    the same properties. Jenny and Sue are wearing
    the same dress.
  • Numerical identity A and B are one and the same.
    Clark Kent is the same person as Superman. Jenny
    and Sue are in love with the same man.
  • Personal identity is about numerical identity
    not, am I the just the same as I was 10 years
    ago?, but rather am I the same person, or are
    there two people involved one that existed 10
    years ago but no longer, and me now?
  • Heraclitus You cannot step into the same river
    twice. The river is constantly changing (i.e.
    qualitatively different), so it is not the same
    river (i.e. numerically different).

4
Identity of objects
  • Washingtons axe
  • This is Washingtons axe. The handles been
    replaced three times and the heads been replaced
    twice.
  • Ship of Theseus
  • Ancient Greek puzzle a ship has been repaired so
    many times that there are no planks left at all
    from when the ship was first built. Is it still
    the same ship?
  • Hobbess addition what if all the original
    planks were gathered up and the ship was rebuilt
    with them?
  • Which ship now would be the original ship?

5
Identity of persons
  • What makes A at time T1 the same person as B and
    time T2? E.g. what makes me the same person as a
    little 9-year-old girl in the U.S. many years
    ago?

6
The animal approach
  • Adult me is a stage in the life of an animal that
    was born in Oklahoma, USA, many years ago.
    9-year-old me was another stage in the life of
    that same animal. A caterpillar is a stage in the
    life of a butterfly.
  • Animals, like the Ship of Theseus, are constantly
    changing, and there may be no cells in common
    between the puppy and the adult dog it grows
    into. But the puppy and the adult dog are
    recognized as the same being.
  • Animals are the same if their bodies change
    gradually and the various stages are connected
    through an underlying design (DNA) and a
    continuous life process.

7
Problems with the animal approach
  • Body switching
  • Lockes thought experiment, a prince and a
    cobbler switch bodies/minds
  • Surely, identity follows the mind. The prince is
    now in the cobblers body and vice versa.
  • Brain transplant
  • Identity travels with the brain?
  • What about part of the brain?

8
Psychological approaches
  • 1) The memory criterion
  • A is B if A can remember Bs experiences or
    thoughts.
  • I can remember being 9, so I am the same person I
    was when I was nine

9
Memory criterion paradox
  • I can remember getting glasses when I was nine,
    but I cant remember what I did the day before I
    got glasses. But the day I got glasses, I could
    remember what I did the day before. So
  • A Kelly today
  • B the 9-year-old Kelly the day she got glasses
  • C the 9-year-old Kelly the day before she got
    glasses
  • According to the memory criterion
  • A B
  • B C
  • but
  • A ? C

10
  • Solution?
  • Memory continuity criterion
  • If A is connected by a chain of memories to B,
    then A is B
  • Kelly today is connected by a shared memory with
    9-year-old Kelly who is connected by a shared
    memory with 3-year-old Kelly who is connected by
    a shared memory with 2-year-old Kelly. Therefore
    Kelly today is the same person as 2-year-old
    Kelly.

11
  • Remaining problems for the memory criteria
  • Am I the same person as when I was a baby, if
    there is no chain of memory connecting me?
  • If you experience a short episode of amnesia,
    were you a different person during that period of
    time?
  • Are you a different person when youre asleep?
  • Locke
  • if the same Socrates waking and sleeping do not
    partake of the same consciousness, Socrates
    waking and sleeping is not the same person. And
    to punish Socrates waking for what sleeping
    Socrates thought, and waking Socrates was never
    conscious of, would be no more right, than to
    punish one twin for what his brother-twin did,
    whereof he knew nothing, because their outsides
    were so like, that they could not be
    distinguished for such twins have been seen.

12
A B C
  • 2) Psychological continuity
  • Person A is person B if they are connected by
    psychological continuity. I.e. if there are a
    chain of causal psychological connections between
    A and B.
  • E.g. my current psychological state depends on
    the psychological state of my brain when I was
    sleeping last night. For example, the memories
    and personality and mental capabilities that were
    part of my brain last night when I was asleep are
    still (for the most part) part of my brain right
    now. I am who I am partly because of what I was
    last night, last year, and when I was two.

13
  • Problem
  • Psychological continuity may exist beyond the
    relationship between ones past self and ones
    present self. E.g. I am what I am partly because
    of my parents psychological states when I was
    growing up. Thoughts and ideas were transferred
    from their minds to my mind, causing my mind to
    develop a certain way.
  • Solution? The causal connection must be of the
    right kind the normal causal connection between
    psychological states in a mind.
  • Is that a cop-out?

14
Problem cases
  • Brainwashing and total amnesia
  • If you had total amnesia (could remember nothing
    of your previous life) and were brainwashed so
    that you were psychologically radically different
    than before,
  • would you be the same person?
  • On the animal approach yes
  • On the psychological approach no

15
  • Fission
  • Hemispherectomy and half brain transplants
  • Toms brain is divided into two halves and
    transplanted into two different bodies. The right
    hemisphere is transplanted into a new body and
    called Righty. The left hemisphere is
    transplanted into a new body, called Lefty.
    According to the psychological criterion, they
    both should be the same person as Tom. But lefty
    is not righty.
  • Teleportation
  • John is on Planet Zorgon and wants to go back to
    his spaceship. He steps into a teleporter. The
    teleporter makes an exact duplicate of Johns
    body (and brain), destroys Johns body on Zorgon
    and rebuilds his body on the spaceship. The
    duplicate of John on the spaceship remembers
    everything that John did up until the time John
    stepped into the teleporter. He is also
    psychologically identical to John. He thinks he
    is John. Is he right?
  • What if Johns original body is not destroyed?

16
  • Brain implants
  • If your brain was implanted gradually with
    artificial parts that retained the same function
    as your brain, would you retain your identity?
    What if your entire brain was replaced gradually
    in that way? On the animal approach or the
    psychological approach? What if your brain was
    replaced suddenly rather than gradually?

17
Skepticism about personal identity
  • There is no personal identity. You are not the
    same person you were when you were a child, as
    you were last year, or yesterday, or when you
    walked into the lecture room. Any change makes us
    a different person.
  • Problems
  • Moral responsibility how can we blame anyone (or
    praise anyone) for anything they did, when it
    was not them, but their predecessor. I am not
    the person who stole the money yesterday, so
    dont punish me.
  • Concern for our future selves Why should I go to
    class? It wont be me who graduates, but a
    different person. Why buy food, if it wont be me
    who eats it?
  • Perhaps the relationship between A at T1 and A
    at T2 is not one of identity, but it is still a
    special relationship. Special enough that A can
    be punished for the actions of A and A cares
    deeply about the welfare of A.

18
Suggested Readings
  • Derek Parfit, What we believe ourselves to be
    in Reasons and Persons, pgs. 199-217, on reserve
    in the Philosophy Department office
  • Adam Morton, Identity through Time in Problems
    in Philosophy, pgs. 407-415, on reserve in the
    Philosophy Department office
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com