Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy

Description:

Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy What models can balance the needs of payors and industry? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Beng48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy


1
Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy
  • What models can balance the needs of payors and
    industry?

2
Three Waves of Health Economics
  • The principles
  • The benefits of innovation
  • From price comparisons to cost-effectiveness
  • The fourth hurdle
  • HTA and Cost effectiveness as a requirement for
    pricing and reimbursement
  • Health economics in the market place
  • Accountable health economics

3
The first wave establishing the principles
  • Cost-containment a new important goal for health
    care systems in 1970s
  • OECD international comparative data base
  • Health economics not primarily about cost
    containment
  • Allocation of resources for better health
  • Economic evaluation a method for assessing costs
    and benefits of actions aimed at better health
  • Innovation a major factor in health care

4
Benefits of innovation
  • Reduced health care expenditures in other
    sectors, for example hospitalisations
  • Improved productivity
  • Reduced indirect costs due to illness
  • Improved survival
  • Value of life
  • Improved quality of life
  • Quality-adjusted life years

5
HTA and Market AccessCost-effectiveness as a new
criteria
  • HTA for medical technologies established in the
    US in the 1970s
  • First European agency established in Sweden 1987
    (SBU)
  • Today agencies in most countries
  • Introduction of the 4th hurdle for drugs
  • Australia 1992
  • UK, NICE 1999
  • Sweden, LFN 2002

6
HTA and reimbursement (1)
  • Reduce price differences between products with
    similar effectiveness
  • In a dynamic market you expect price
    differentials which consumers react to
  • Payers do not trust the health care providers to
    react to price differentials in a rational way
  • HTA is used to provide evidence for clustering
  • IQWiG as example
  • Statins and insulin analouges

7
HTA and reimbursement (2)
  • For drugs the are true innovations, HTA will be
    used to provide information for
  • Cost-effective indications at different levels of
    price at introduction
  • Reimbursement will be linked to
    cost-effectiveness
  • Follow-up studies for gaining additional
    information
  • Verification that the right patients are treated
  • Verification of benefits in clinical practice

8
France The Transparency CommissionASMR
Amelioration du Service Medical Rendu
  • ASMR I
  • Major therapeutic advance
  • ASMR II
  • Important improvement in terms of efficacy and/or
    safety
  • AMSR III
  • Modest progress in terms of efficacy and/or
    safety
  • AMSR IV
  • Minor progress in terms of efficacy and/or safety
  • AMSR V
  • No therapeutic progress

9
France Criteria for pricing and reimbursement
  • ASMR I-II
  • Reimbursement and free pricing
  • Based on comparison with prices in other big
    five
  • Answer within 15 days
  • Price fixed for 5 years
  • ASMR III
  • Same as above if sales below 40MEuro
  • AMSR IV-V
  • Bargaining and reference pricing

10
Germany and the Netherlands
  • To be or not be clustered that is the question
  • (Hamlet, Prince of Denmark)
  • HTA and economic evaluation may influence the
    decision
  • If clustered
  • Reference price
  • If not clustered
  • Opportunities for premium price based on HTA and
    economic evaluation

11
Evidence based re-imbursementLFN Review of
Anti-ulcer drugs in Sweden
  • Reimbursement for generic omeprazole
  • Generic substitution at pharmacy
  • Reimbursement for Nexium (patent)
  • In erosive GERD
  • For HP eradication
  • No reimbursement for other products unless they
    reduce price to that of generic omeprazole

12
Impact of HTA and Economic Evaluation on Decision
Making Evidence from EUROMET
  • EUROMET 2000
  • Limited knowledge about economic evaluation
  • No evidence on influence on decision making
  • EUROMET 2004
  • Improved knowledge about economic evaluation
  • Some influence, put the potential greater than
    actual use
  • Main barriers relevance and bias

13
European Comparator report regarding funding and
access to oncology drugs
  • Karolinska Institute (KI)/ Stockholm School of
    Economics (SSE), Stockholm Sweden
  • Nils Wilking nils.wilking_at_karolinska.se
  • Bengt Jönsson bengt.jonsson_at_hhs.se
  • Christer Svedman MD, PhD, KI.
  • Niklas Zethraeus PhD, SSE.
  • Frank Lichtenberg, Columbia University, New York

14
Trastuzumab uptake in selected European countries
15
Trastuzumab uptake in selected European countries
16
Trastuzumab uptake in selected European countries
17
Trastuzumab uptake in selected European countries
18
(No Transcript)
19
The third waveThe role of health economics in a
possible resolution
  • Decisions about reimbursement are based on
    therapeutic value and cost-effectiveness
  • Price controls should be abolished since price is
    declared in the reimbursement application and
    included in the cost-effectiveness study
  • Resource allocation is directed towards an
    optimal use of new medicines
  • Provide correct incentives for investments in RD

20
The third waveConsequences
  • Reimbursement will be for defined indications
  • Decisions about reimbursement based on evidence
    at launch
  • Follow-up studies used to reveal the true
    cost-effectiveness in different indications
  • Industry and other stake holders share
    information needed to assess cost-effectiveness
  • This evidence will be used as a basis for
    clinical governance

21
The third waveAccountable health economics
  • Benefits for industry
  • Market access for new medicines
  • Pricing related to therapeutic value in actual
    use
  • Improved and trustful relation to its customers
  • Market based incentives for innovation
  • Benefits for the costumers
  • Patients will get access to the best possible
    therapy within the general resource constraints
    that health care systems work within
  • Drugs will take the share of health care
    expenditures that is determined by the
    cost-effectiveness of new medicines
  • Third party payers private as well as public
    can show their principals that money used are
    well spent

22
The third waveAccountable health economics
  • Risks
  • For industry
  • Information will be used against the industry?
  • Unproven business model
  • For the costumers
  • Captured by industry?
  • Alternatives
  • More regulation?
  • Less reimbursement?

23
The third wave - Summary
  • Information for economic evaluations will come
    from actual use of technology
  • Shared information between different stakeholders
  • Payers, industry,doctors,patients
  • Innovations will be used to improve the quality
    and efficiency of the health care system

24
Thanks for your attention!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com