Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea

Description:

Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea Miles McPhee McPhee Research Company Horizontally Homogeneous Model Results Initialize model with every profile with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Mile50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea


1
Marginal Thermobaric Stability in the Weddell Sea
  • Miles McPhee
  • McPhee Research Company

2
Thermobaric Instability Following Loyning and
Weber, JGR, 102, p. 27875
2-layer system, upper layer colder and less saline
Linearized equation of state
Thermal expansion coefficient increases with depth
ambient
3
Weddell Sea
Greenland Sea
4
Strength of thermobaric tendency must exceed the
background stratification
Marginal stability line
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
ANZFLUX Ship CTD station 50, linearized
11
2.4 hour average of turbulence measurements
centered at time 206.35 (Warm Regime drift).
Circles are averages lines are twice the std dev
of the 15-min samples.
12
(No Transcript)
13
Two-layer (Type II) stability diagram following
Akitomo (1999) for idealized Ship Station 50
Increase Sml
14
  • The thermobaric barrier calculation
  • Calculate the actual density (pressure included),
    subtract density of a water column with mixed
    layer properties. Determine the level (zmax) of
    the maximum difference drmax.
  • Determine the sensible heat that must be vented
    to reduce water temperature above zmax to ?ml.
  • Add the latent heat loss required to increase
    salinity (by freezing) enough to eliminate ?? at
    zml
  • Htot is the total heat loss.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Pentagrams indicate Hto t lt 100 MJ/m2
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
27.4 W m-2
McPhee, Kottmeier and Morison, JPO, 1999
23
Ice temperatures from the AWI Buoy thermistor
string
24
Mean values almost identical 30 W m-2
25
Friction velocity prescribed from buoy results.
Heat flux also from buoy ice measurements but
scaled by the calculated ice thickness
Ocean heat flux calculated prognostically, ice
thickness determined by enthalpy balance at the
interface.
Dynamic mixed layer depth based on buoyancy
frequency (pot density). Scalar based on
difference from near surface value.
The model neglects thermobaric effects but
calculates thermobaric barrier parameters at each
time step.
26
The 1-D model forced with buoy data and
initialized with YU075 No thermobaricity effect
considered.
27
The 1-D model forced with buoy data and
initialized with YU075 Eddy viscosity set to 2000
cm2/s across vertical domain after 217.75.
28
Horizontally Homogeneous Model Results
  • Initialize model with every profile with Htot lt
    100 MJ m-2 forced by buoy time series (38)
  • 27 1-D profiles became unstable by the end of
    August

29
Is there a simple way of getting a handle on eddy
viscosity and scalar diffusivity when
thermobaric mixing is occurring?
  1. Parameterize entrainment process in terms of
    conversion of PE to TKE
  2. Base the mixing length on a fraction (k) of the
    entrained layer depth
  3. Then

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Summary
  • Thermobaric instability was not observed directly
    during the ANZFLUX 94 project but there is a
    strong inference that it occurred shortly after.
  • About ¼ of the profiles observed with the yoyo
    CTD system during the Maud Rise drift went
    thermobarically unstable by the end of winter in
    a simple 1-D model forced with drifting buoy
    data.
  • In the model, preconditioning of the initial
    density profile to include distinct step-like
    structure in the upper pyncnocline was necessary
    for instability.
  • Steps were found mostly in the halo region
    surrounding Maud Rise (2500-3000 m isobaths)

34
Summary (cont)
  • There may be a good chance of encountering
    episodes of Type II convection near Maud Rise in
    late winter.
  • Measuring turbulent dissipation rates and
    turbulent fluxes directly during a Type II
    episode is feasible based on ANZFLUX experience.
    Such data would be of great value in evaluating
    and guiding numerical model development.
  • Even in the absence of direct Type II convection,
    studying processes that maintain the step
    structure and pycnocline weather in the Weddell
    would add significantly to our understanding of
    the system.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com