CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics

Description:

CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics Gaurav S. Sukhatme Computer Science Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory University of Southern California – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Gaur152
Learn more at: https://robotics.usc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CS 547: Sensing and Planning in Robotics


1
CS 547 Sensing and Planning in Robotics
  • Gaurav S. Sukhatme
  • Computer Science
  • Robotic Embedded Systems Laboratory
  • University of Southern California
  • gaurav_at_usc.edu
  • http//robotics.usc.edu/gaurav

2
Probabilistic Robotics
  • Key idea Explicit representation of uncertainty
    using the calculus of probability theory
  • Perception state estimation
  • Action utility optimization

3
Advantages and Pitfalls
  • Can accommodate inaccurate models
  • Can accommodate imperfect sensors
  • Robust in real-world applications
  • Best known approach to many hard robotics
    problems
  • Computationally demanding
  • False assumptions
  • Approximate

4
Axioms of Probability Theory
  • Pr(A) denotes probability that proposition A is
    true.

5
A Closer Look at Axiom 3
6
Using the Axioms
7
Discrete Random Variables
  • X denotes a random variable.
  • X can take on a finite number of values in x1,
    x2, , xn.
  • P(Xxi), or P(xi), is the probability that the
    random variable X takes on value xi.
  • P( ) is called probability mass function.
  • E.g.

.
8
Continuous Random Variables
  • X takes on values in the continuum.
  • p(Xx), or p(x), is a probability density
    function.
  • E.g.

p(x)
x
9
Joint and Conditional Probability
  • P(Xx and Yy) P(x,y)
  • If X and Y are independent then P(x,y) P(x)
    P(y)
  • P(x y) is the probability of x given y P(x
    y) P(x,y) / P(y) P(x,y) P(x y) P(y)
  • If X and Y are independent then P(x y) P(x)

10
Law of Total Probability
Discrete case
Continuous case
11
Reverend Thomas Bayes, FRS (1702-1761)
  • Clergyman and mathematician who first used
    probability inductively and established a
    mathematical basis for probability inference

12
Bayes Formula
13
Normalization
Algorithm
14
Conditioning
  • Total probability
  • Bayes rule and background knowledge

15
Simple Example of State Estimation
  • Suppose a robot obtains measurement z
  • What is P(openz)?

16
Causal vs. Diagnostic Reasoning
  • P(openz) is diagnostic.
  • P(zopen) is causal.
  • Often causal knowledge is easier to obtain.
  • Bayes rule allows us to use causal knowledge

17
Example
  • P(zopen) 0.6 P(z?open) 0.3
  • P(open) P(?open) 0.5
  • z raises the probability that the door is open.

18
Combining Evidence
  • Suppose our robot obtains another observation z2.
  • How can we integrate this new information?
  • More generally, how can we estimateP(x z1...zn
    )?

19
Recursive Bayesian Updating
Markov assumption zn is independent of
z1,...,zn-1 if we know x.
20
Example Second Measurement
  • P(z2open) 0.5 P(z2?open) 0.6
  • P(openz1)2/3
  • z2 lowers the probability that the door is open.

21
Actions
  • Often the world is dynamic since
  • actions carried out by the robot,
  • actions carried out by other agents,
  • or just the time passing by
  • change the world.
  • How can we incorporate such actions?

22
Typical Actions
  • The robot turns its wheels to move
  • The robot uses its manipulator to grasp an object
  • Plants grow over time
  • Actions are never carried out with absolute
    certainty.
  • In contrast to measurements, actions generally
    increase the uncertainty.

23
Modeling Actions
  • To incorporate the outcome of an action u into
    the current belief, we use the conditional pdf
  • P(xu,x)
  • This term specifies the pdf that executing u
    changes the state from x to x.

24
Example Closing the door
25
State Transitions
  • P(xu,x) for u close door
  • If the door is open, the action close door
    succeeds in 90 of all cases.

26
Integrating the Outcome of Actions
Continuous case Discrete case
27
Example The Resulting Belief
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com