Evaluating a Qualitative Research Paper - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating a Qualitative Research Paper

Description:

Evaluating a Qualitative Research Paper Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD Qualitative Research -- What is it? A style of research that focuses on understanding meaning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:639
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Davi1611
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating a Qualitative Research Paper


1
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Paper
  • Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD

2
Qualitative Research -- What is it?
  • A style of research that focuses on understanding
    meaning rather than in generating numbers to be
    combined.
  • Aims to provide understanding of the topic, which
    is usually human behavior
  • Seeks to generate hypotheses or theories rather
    than conclusions or explanations

3
Qualitative Research -- What is it?
  • Like quantitative research
  • Consists of question, evidence, assessment,
    findings, and drawing conclusions
  • Unlike qualitative research
  • It involves reflection on the data,
    reconceptualization midway through the research,
    subjectivity

4
Quantitative Research Methodology
  • Research question ?
  • Hypothesis generation?
  • Evidence collection ?
  • Evidence analysis ?
  • Interpretation ?
  • . . . . . . . . . . . .Conclusions

5
Qualitative Analysis
  • Research question ?
  • Collect evidence ?
  • Understand the question

. . . . . . . . . . . .Conclusions
6
(No Transcript)
7
Research Styles
  • Case studies
  • Ethnographic
  • Focus groups
  • Role playing
  • In-depth surveys
  • Discourse analysis
  • Textual analysis

8
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
  • Step 1 Relevance
  • Step 2 Validity
  • Was the appropriate method used to answer the
    question?
  • Perceptions Interviews, focus groups
  • Behaviors Some type of observation

9
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
  • Was sampling appropriate and adequate?
  • Random sampling not important
  • Goal Enough subjects with enough different views
    or behaviors to provide sufficient information
  • Not looking for generalizability
  • Example utility in decision analysis
  • Patients vs physicians as source

10
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
  • Was an iterative process used?
  • Collect data -- analyze -- collect more data --
    analyze, . . .
  • Example content analysis of the hypertension
    self-assessment module

11
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
  • Was a thorough analysis presented?
  • Interpretation, subjective and value-laden, is
    important
  • Researchers are part of the research

12
Evaluating a Qualitative Research Article
  • What is the background of the investigators?
  • What lens are they looking through?
  • Nurse vs physician vs anthropologist vs
    sociologist
  • Not to judge, but to understand their biases
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com