Title: ASEN 5050 SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICS Orbit Transfers
1ASEN 5050SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICSOrbit Transfers
- Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker
- University of Colorado Boulder
2Announcements
- Homework 4 is due Friday 9/26 at 900 am
- Youll have to turn in your code for this one.
- Again, write this code yourself, but you can use
other code to validate it. - Concept Quiz 8 is active after this lecture due
before Wednesdays lecture. - Mid-term Exam will be handed out Friday, 10/17
and will be due Wed 10/22. (CAETE 10/29) - Take-home. Open book, open notes.
- Once you start the exam you have to be finished
within 24 hours. - It should take 2-3 hours.
- Todays office hours are at 200.
- Reading Chapter 6 (SIX, we jumped a few)
3Space News
- Sunday MAVEN arrived at Mars!
4Space News
Today Cassini is flying by Titan for the 106th
time. 1400 km altitude, 5.6 km/s Vp
5Space News
- Then Tuesday MOM arrives at Mars!
- MOI Tuesday at 2000 Mountain
- It will enter occultation at 2004
- MOI will end at 2024
- Well know if its successful around 2030
- Notice that I write Tuesday here. Itll be
Wednesday in India and that keeps throwing me off
? Aw, time conversions! - Not sure if there will be media coverage. Try
http//www.spaceflightnow.com/ or NASA TV.
6ASEN 5050SPACEFLIGHT DYNAMICSOrbital Maneuvers
- Prof. Jeffrey S. Parker
- University of Colorado - Boulder
7Orbital Maneuvers
- Hohmann Transfer Walter Hohmann (1880-1945)
showed minimum energy transfer between two orbits
used two tangential burns.
8Hohmann Transfer
- Can also be done using elliptical orbits, but
must start at apogee or perigee to be a minimum
energy transfer.
(Algorithm 36, Example 6-1)
9Hohmann Transfer
- We just argued that the Hohmann Transfer is
(usually) the most energy-efficient orbital
transfer. - Why?
- Consider EllipticalElliptical transfer
- Tangential Burns
- Energy efficiency considerations
V is highest at perigee, thus energy-changing
maneuvers are the most efficient at perigee!
10Energy Changes
11Hohmann Transfer
- Example LEO to GEO
- LEO altitude 185 km, radius 6563.136 km
- GEO altitude 35,786 km, radius 42,164 km
- VLEO 7.7932 km/s VGEO 3.0747 km/s
- VpT 10.2521 km/s VaT 1.5958 km/s
- ?V1 2.4590 km/s ?V2 1.4788 km/s
- Total ?V 3.9378 km/s
12Hohmann Transfer
GEO
Moon Radius
13Hohmann Transfer
GEO
Moon Radius
General radii transfers
14Orbital Maneuvers
- Bi-elliptic Transfer Uses two Hohmann
transfers. Can save Dv in some cases. rb must
be greater than rfinal, but can otherwise be
optimized.
15Bi-elliptic Transfer
SIMPLE, because all maneuvers are tangential,
co-planar.
16Bi-elliptic Transfer
- Much longer flight times for bi-elliptic
transfer, but sometimes less energy.
(Algorithm 37, Example 6-2)
17Bi-elliptic Transfer
- LEO GEO via 100,000 km altitude ?V
- ?V1 2.903 km/s
- ?V2 0.799 km/s
- ?V3 0.605 km/s
- Total ?V 4.307 km/s
- More than Hohmann!
18Bi-elliptic LEO-GEO
Moon Radius
19Bi-elliptic LEO-GEO
Hohmann
Moon Radius
20Bi-elliptic Transfer
- LEO 250,000 km via 2.4 million km altitude ?V
- ?V1 3.192 km/s
- ?V2 0.329 km/s
- ?V3 0.327 km/s
- Total ?V 3.849 km/s
- More than Hohmann (4.058 km/s)!
21Bi-elliptic 185 km 250,000 km
Hohmann
Moon Radius
22Hohmann vs Bi-elliptic
23One-Tangent Burns
24Orbit Transfer Comparison
25Changing Orbital Elements
- ?a ? Hohmann Transfer
- ?e ? Hohmann Transfer
- ?i ? Plane Change
- ?O ? Plane Change
- ?? ? Coplanar Transfer
- ?? ? Phasing/Rendezvous
26Changing Inclination
- ?i ? Plane Change
- Inclination-Only Change vs. Free Inclination
Change
27Changing Inclination
- Lets start with circular orbits
Vf
V0
28Changing Inclination
- Lets start with circular orbits
Vf
V0
29Changing Inclination
- Lets start with circular orbits
Are these vectors the same length? Whats the
?V? Is this more expensive in a low orbit or a
high orbit?
Vf
V0
?i
30Changing Inclination
- More general inclination-only maneuvers
Where do you perform the maneuver? How do V0 and
Vf compare? What about the FPA?
Line of Nodes
31Changing Inclination
- More general inclination-only maneuvers
32Changing The Node
33Changing The Node
Where is the maneuver located?
Neither the max latitude nor at any normal
feature of the orbit!
There are somewhat long expressions for how to
find uinitial and ufinal in the book for circular
orbits. Lamberts Problem gives easier solutions.
34Changing Argument of Perigee
35Changing Argument of Perigee
36Changing Argument of Perigee
Which ?V is cheaper?
37Circular Rendezvous (coplanar)
- Target spacecraft interceptor spacecraft
38Circular Rendezvous (coplanar)
39How do we build these?
- Determine your phase angle, f
- Determine how long you want to spend performing
the transfer - How many revolutions?
- Build the transfer
- Compute the ?V
40How do we build these?
41Example 6-8
This should be 20
42Example 6-8
Should be positive
This should really be an absolute value (one
maneuver is in-track, one is anti-velocity)
This should really be an absolute value (one
maneuver is in-track, one is anti-velocity)
43Conclusions
- Better to use as many revolutions as possible to
save fuel. - Trade-off is transfer duration
- If you perform the transfer quickly, be sure to
check your periapse altitude.
44Circular Coplanar Rendezvous (Different Orbits)
45Circular Coplanar Rendezvous (Different Orbits)
- Use Hohmann Transfer
- The wait time, or time until the interceptor
and target are in the correct positions
p aL
Synodic Period
46Example 6-9
47Example 6-9
I think this should be pi alpha, not alpha pi
(see Fig 6-17)
48Announcements
- Homework 4 is due Friday 9/26 at 900 am
- Youll have to turn in your code for this one.
- Again, write this code yourself, but you can use
other code to validate it. - Concept Quiz 8 is active after this lecture due
before Wednesdays lecture. - Mid-term Exam will be handed out Friday, 10/17
and will be due Wed 10/22. (CAETE 10/29) - Take-home. Open book, open notes.
- Once you start the exam you have to be finished
within 24 hours. - It should take 2-3 hours.
- Todays office hours are at 200.
- Reading Chapter 6 (SIX, we jumped a few)