Title: Relativity
1Chapter 26
2- Relative Motion
- (Galilean Relativity)
- Chapter 3 Section 5
http//www.physics.mun.ca/jjerrett/relative/relat
ive.html
3- Michelson Interferometer
- Chapter 25 Section 7
4Michelson Interferometer
- The Michelson Interferometer is an optical
instrument that has great scientific importance - It splits a beam of light into two parts and then
recombines them to form an interference pattern - It is used to make accurate length measurements
5Michelson Interferometer, schematic
- A beam of light provided by a monochromatic
source is split into two rays by a partially
silvered mirror M - One ray is reflected to M1 and the other
transmitted to M2 - After reflecting, the rays combine to form an
interference pattern - The glass plate ensures both rays travel the same
distance through glass
Active Figure The Michelson Interferometer
6Measurements with a Michelson Interferometer
- The interference pattern for the two rays is
determined by the difference in their path
lengths - When M1 is moved a distance of ?/4, successive
light and dark fringes are formed - This change in a fringe from light to dark is
called fringe shift - The wavelength can be measured by counting the
number of fringe shifts for a measured
displacement of M - If the wavelength is accurately known, the mirror
displacement can be determined to within a
fraction of the wavelength
7Luminiferous Ether
- Classical physicists (Maxwell, Hertz, etc.)
compared electromagnetic waves to mechanical
waves - Mechanical waves need a medium to support the
disturbance (air, water, string, etc.) - The luminiferous ether was proposed as the medium
required (and present) for light waves to
propagate - Present everywhere, even in empty space
- Massless, but rigid medium
- Could have no effect on the motion of planets or
other objects
8Verifying the Luminiferous Ether
- Associated with the ether was an absolute frame
of reference in which light travels with speed c - The Earth moves through the ether, so there
should be an ether wind blowing - If v is the speed of the ether wind relative to
the Earth, the observed speed of light should
have a maximum (a), minimum (b), or in-between
(c) value depending on its orientation to the
wind
9Michelson-Morley Experiment
- First performed in 1881 by Michelson
- Repeated under various conditions by Michelson
and Morley - Designed to detect small changes in the speed of
light - By determining the velocity of the Earth relative
to the ether
10Michelson-Morley Equipment
- Used the Michelson Interferometer
- Arm 2 is initially aligned along the direction of
the earths motion through space
- An interference pattern was observed
- The interferometer was rotated through 90
- Should observe small, but measurable, shifts in
the fringe pattern as orientation with the ether
wind changes
Active Figure The Michelson-Morley Experiment
11Michelson-Morley Results
- Measurements failed to show any change in the
fringe pattern - No fringe shift of the magnitude required was
ever observed - The addition laws for velocities were incorrect
- The speed of light is a constant in all inertial
frames of reference - Light is now understood to be an electromagnetic
wave, which requires no medium for its
propagation - The idea of an ether was discarded
12 13Basic Problems
- The speed of every particle of matter in the
universe always remains less than the speed of
light - Newtonian Mechanics is a limited theory
- It places no upper limit on speed
- It breaks down at speeds greater than about 10
of the speed of light (v gt .1c) - Newtonian Mechanics becomes a specialized case of
Einsteins Theory of Special Relativity - When speeds are much less than the speed of light
vltltc
14Galilean Relativity
- Choose a frame of reference
- Necessary to describe a physical event
- According to Galilean Relativity, the laws of
mechanics are the same in all inertial frames of
reference - An inertial frame of reference is one in which
Newtons Laws are valid - Objects subjected to no forces will move in
straight lines
15Galilean Relativity, cont.
- A passenger in an airplane throws a ball straight
up - It appears to move in a vertical path
- This is the same motion as when the ball is
thrown while standing at rest on the Earth - The law of gravity and equations of motion under
uniform acceleration are obeyed
16Galilean Relativity, cont
- There is a stationary observer on the ground
- Views the path of the ball thrown to be a
parabola - The ball has a velocity to the right equal to the
velocity of the plane - The law of gravity and equations of motion under
uniform acceleration are still obeyed
17Galilean Relativity, final
- The two observers disagree on the shape of the
balls path - Both agree that the motion obeys the law of
gravity and Newtons laws of motion - Both agree on how long the ball was in the air
- Conclusion There is no preferred frame of
reference for describing the laws of mechanics
18Galilean Relativity Limitations
- Galilean Relativity does not apply to experiments
in electricity, magnetism, optics, and other
areas - Results do not agree with experiments
- According to Galilean relativity, the observer S
should measure the speed of the light pulse as
vc - Actually observer S measures the speed as c
- What is the problem?
19Albert Einstein
- 1879 1955
- 1905 published four papers
- Brownian motion
- Photoelectric effect
- 2 on Special Relativity
- 1916 published theory of General Relativity
- Searched for a unified theory
- Never found one
20Einsteins Principle of Relativity
- Resolves the contradiction between Galilean
relativity and the fact that the speed of light
is the same for all observers - Postulates
- The Principle of Relativity All the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames - The constancy of the speed of light The speed of
light in a vacuum has the same value in all
inertial reference frames, regardless of the
velocity of the observer or the velocity of the
source emitting the light
21The Principle of Relativity
- The results of any kind of experiment performed
in one laboratory at rest must be the same as
when performed in another laboratory moving at a
constant velocity relative to the first one - No preferred inertial reference frame exists
- It is impossible to detect absolute motion with
respect to an absolute frame of reference
22The Constancy of the Speed of Light
- Been confirmed experimentally in many ways
- A direct demonstration involves measuring the
speed of photons emitted by particles traveling
near the speed of light - Confirms the speed of light to five significant
figures - Explains the null result of the Michelson-Morley
experiment relative motion is unimportant when
measuring the speed of light - We must alter our common-sense notions of space
and time
23Consequences of Special Relativity
- In relativistic mechanics
- There is no such thing as absolute length
- There is no such thing as absolute time
- Events at different locations that are observed
to occur simultaneously in one frame are not
observed to be simultaneous in another frame
moving uniformly past the first - In Special Relativity, Einstein abandoned the
assumption of simultaneity
24Simultaneity Thought Experiment
- Thought experiment
- A boxcar moves with uniform velocity v
- Two lightning bolts strike the ends
- Flashes leave points A and B on the car and
points A and B on the ground at speed c
- Observer O is midway between the points of
lightning strikes on the ground, A and B - Observer O is midway between the points of
lightning strikes on the boxcar, A and B
25Simultaneity Results
- The light signals reach observer O at the same
time - He concludes the light has traveled at the same
speed over equal distances - Observer O concludes the lightning bolts occurred
simultaneously
26Simultaneity Results, cont
- By the time the light has reached observer O,
observer O on the car has moved - The light from B has already moved by observer
O, but the light from A has not yet reached him - The two observers must find that light travels at
the same speed - Observer O concludes the lightning struck the
front of the boxcar before it struck the back
(they were not simultaneous events)
27Simultaneity Summary
- Two events that are simultaneous in one reference
frame are in general not simultaneous in a second
reference frame moving relative to the first - That is, simultaneity is not an absolute concept,
but rather one that depends on the state of
motion of the observer - In the thought experiment, both observers are
correct, because there is no preferred inertial
reference frame
28Time Dilation, Moving Observer
- The vehicle is moving to the right with speed v
- A mirror is fixed to the ceiling of the vehicle
- An observer, O, at rest in this system holds a
laser a distance d below the mirror - The laser emits a pulse of light directed at the
mirror (event 1) and the pulse arrives back after
being reflected (event 2)
29Time Dilation, Moving Observer
- Observer O carries a clock
- She uses it to measure the time between the
events (?tp) - The p stands for proper
- She observes events 1 and 2 to occur at the same
place - Light travels distance 2d c?tp
- The time interval ?tp is called the proper time
- The proper time is the time interval between
events as measured by an observer who sees the
events occur at the same position - You must be able to correctly identify the
observer who measures the proper time interval
30Time Dilation, Stationary Observer
- Observer O is a stationary observer on the Earth
- He observes the mirror and O to move with
velocity v - By the time the light from the laser reaches the
mirror, the mirror has moved to the right
- The light must travel farther with respect to O
than with respect to O
31Time Dilation, Stationary Observer
- Observer O carries a clock
- He uses it to measure the time between the events
(?t) - He observes events 1 and 2 to occur at different
places - Events separated by distance v?t
- Light travels distance c?t
32Time Dilation, Observations
- O and O must measure the same speed of light
- The light travels farther for O
- The time interval, ?t, for O is longer than the
time interval for O, ?tp - Observer O measures a longer time interval than
observer O by the factor gamma
Active Figure Time Dilation
33Time Dilation, Example
v
- The time interval ?t between two events measured
by an observer moving with respect to a clock is
longer than the time interval ?tp between the
same two events measured by an observer at rest
with respect to the clock - For example, when observer O, moving at v
0.5c, claims that 1.00 s has passed on the clock,
observer O claims that ?t ? ?tp (1.15)(1.00s)
1.15 s has passed Observer O considers the
clock of O to be reading too low a value
running to slow - A clock in motion runs more slowly than an
identical stationary clock
O
O
34Time Dilation Equivalent Views
- Initial View Observer O views O moving with
speed v to the right and the clock of O is
running more slowly - Equivalent View Observer O views O as the one
who is really moving with speed v to the left and
the clock of O is running more slowly - The principle of relativity requires that the
views of the two observers in uniform relative
motion must be equally valid and capable of being
checked experimentally
35Time Dilation Generalization
- All physical processes slow down relative to a
clock when those processes occur in a frame
moving with respect to the clock - These processes can be chemical and biological as
well as physical - Time dilation is a very real phenomena that has
been verified by various experiments
36Time Dilation Verification
- Muons are unstable particles that have the same
charge as an electron, but a mass 207 times more
than an electron - Muons have a half-life of ?tp 2.2 µs when
measured in a reference frame at rest with
respect to them (a) unlikely to reach the
Earths surface. - Relative to an observer on earth, muons should
have a longer lifetime of ?tp ? ?tp (b)
likely to reach surface - A CERN experiment measured lifetimes in agreement
with the predictions of relativity
37Length Contraction
- The measured distance between two points depends
on the frame of reference of the observer - The proper length, Lp, of an object is the length
of the object measured by someone at rest
relative to the object - The length of an object measured in a reference
frame that is moving with respect to the object
is always less than the proper length - This effect is known as length contraction
38Length Contraction Equation
-
- Length contraction takes place only along the
direction of motion
Active Figure Length Contraction
39Length Contraction, Example
v
- The length between two points L measured by an
observer moving with respect to a ruler is
shorter than the length Lp between the same two
points measured by an observer at rest with
respect to the ruler - For example, when observer O, moving at v
0.5c, claims that a length of 1.00 m is measured
by a ruler, observer O claims that L Lp /?
(1.00 m)/(1.15) 0.87 m is the measured length
between the two points Observer O considers the
length of O to be contracted - A ruler in motion is contracted compared to an
identical stationary ruler
O
O