PBL course program day 3 :

1
PBL course program day 3

• 9.00    Presentation and discussion by group CS1.
  Reviewed by
• Gilberto Berardinelli, Mohammad Komareji,
  Anders Nickelsen.
• 9.30    Presentation and discussion by group CS2.
  Reviewed by 
• Joseph Okika, Mauro Pelosi, Martin Kragelund.
• 10.00    Coffee Break
• 10.30    Presentation and discussion by group
  ES2. Reviewed by Shuhao Li, Rolf Njor Jensen,
  Majbritt D. Lund.
• 11.00    Presentation and discussion by group
  AC2. Reviewed by
• Istvan Knoll, Axel Gottlieb Michelsen, Jimmy
  Nielsen.
• 11.30    Presentation and discussion by group
  AC1. Reviewed by Nadeem Iftikhar, Jacob
  Deleuran Grunnet, Jesper Grønbæk.
• 12.00    Lunch
• 13.00    Presentation and discussion by group
  ES1. Reviewed by
• Søren H. Mørup, Andreas Popp, Klaus Trangbæk.
• 13.30    Examinations of projects Why and
  How        PP-Presentation
• 14.30    Unanswered questions and evaluation of
  second part of the course.

2
Assessment - the hidden curriculum
The aim of the study goals objectives
Forms of the exams and criteria
Teaching and learning methods PBL and project
work
3
Basic assumptions

• Examination is dominating the students learning
  approach
• Criteria for evaluation are crucial for the
  learning process
• Evaluation is a basic part for the learning
  process (reflection)
• (Personal skills, metalearning etc. need
  formative evaluation forms)

4
How to Assess/Evaluate students ?

• What kind of questions should we ask
• To monitor if the students have reached the
  learning goals of the semester
• To improve the students learning process
• Discuss this for 5 minutes

5
Guidelines for Project EvaluationE study board

• 1. Project conclusion (Presentation)
• At the project conclusion the group will present
  the whole project - all group members equally.
  There will be no discussion or evaluation of the
  quality of the project. The conclusion should
  normally take 10 minutes per student but normally
  not more than 1 hour per group.

6

• 2. Examination (individual)
• The examination may be based on questions
  prepared in advance on the basis of the project
  report including all central subjects within the
  project unit goal.
• Each group member is given 35-45 minutes for
  examination and voting. Concerning B.Sc.-,
  M.Sc.-, and Master-thesis projects each group
  member may be given 15 minutes more.
• The evaluation is based on both the written
  report and the oral presentation. The report is
  indirectly part of the evaluation and will not be
  graded separately.
• The members of the project group are not allowed
  to be present in the examination room before they
  are to be examined or have been examined.

7

• 3. Discussion of the report
• When all group members have been examined and all
  grades are given the group will be offered
  feedback to the project report.
• Note
• From fall 2007 grades are given according to the
  7-step scale.
• The students are entitled to receive the grade
  immediately after the examination. However, the
  students and the supervisor may decide that
  grades are given when all group members have been
  examined. The students are entitled to receive
  the grade in private.
• During the voting the examiner and the supervisor
  must take notes about the presentation and the
  assessment of grades to be used in case of
  possible complaints. The notes must be kept for
  at least 1 year further until a possible
  complaint is finished.

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)