Title:
1 Ð. Milkovic, M. Ranogajec-Komor, S. Miljanic,
Ž. Kneževic and K. Krpan Children Hospital
Srebrnjak Zagreb, CroatiaRuder Boškovic
Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS FOR
DOSE MEASUREMENTS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY
2Our wish is that all children are safe and
protected in radiology department!
3INTRODUCTION
- Pulmonary X-rays are essential in the
diagnostics of lung diseases of children and
youth. - Chest radiography represents the majority of
radiological examinations. - The starting basis for radiation protection is
the exact determination of doses.
4FEATURES
- very low doses at low and variable energies have
to be measured - there exists a considerable variation in
radiation doses delivered to patients (different
X-ray equipment, different staff, etc.).
5AIM
- to test a new Shimadzu X-ray unit used for thorax
examination of children - to compare a thermoluminescence (TL) dosimetry
system based on LiF Mg,Cu,P with the
radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass dosimetry
system (FGD-200).
6MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Irradiations
- 137Cs gamma rays in air for calibration
- ISOVOLT 420 X Ray Unit (40-300 kV, 1-20 mA) at
the SSDL in air and on the water phantom (plastic
bottle, F11 cm, V2.5 l) energy dependence - Energies 33, 48, 65 keV
- Dnom 2 mGy (air kerma)
- 150 kV Shimadzu CH-200M unit in air
- Phantoms
- water phantom (plastic bottle)
- doll phantom
7BABY PHANTOM
8Voltage 70 kV Quantity of charge 1.6 mAs Time
of irradiation 5 ms Size of the focus
0.6 mm Distance 150 cm
9BABY FIX
10(No Transcript)
11Dosimetry systems
12RESULTS
- Energy dependence in SSDL
- Doses in diagnostic X-ray unit
13Energy dependence in SSDL
-
- Relative dose in air the mean values of doses
measured (Dmeasured) in air relative to
delivered doses specified as air-kerma
free-in-air (Ka). - On phantom the mean values of the doses measured
on the phantom relative to delivered doses
specified as air kerma free-in-air
14The energy dependence of TL and RPL dosimeters in
SSDL
In air
On phantom
? TLD ? RPLD ? Calculated values of
Hp(10)/Ka
? TLD ? RPLD
15Mean value and standard deviation (SD) of doses
measured on phantoms in diagnostic unit
Phantom Doll (unknown plastic) Doll (unknown plastic) Doll (unknown plastic) Doll (unknown plastic) Bottle (water) Bottle (water) Bottle (water) Bottle (water)
Dosimeter RPL RPL TL TL RPL RPL TL TL
Place of dosimeter Back Sternum Back Sternum Entr. Exit Entr. Exit
Mean dose (mGy) 0.040 0.019 0.049 0.022 0.041 0.004 0.030 0.002
SD (mGy) 0.002 0.006 0.008 0.007 0.002 0.001 0.006 0.004
SD () 4.3 30.6 15.5 30.0 3.9 28.2 19.5 154.9
Dentrance/Dexit 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 11.3 11.3 13.0 13.0
Entr. Entrance
16Doses in diagnostic X-ray unit
- On the doll agreement of the dose values of
RPL and TL dosimeters in entrance and exit beams - On the water phantom difference between the mean
values measured in the ingoing beam with the two
dosimeters - Reason
- ? different materials of phantoms
- ? different energy absorption characteristics
of the two dosimeters (below 50 keV) on water
phantom -
17CONCLUSION
- TLD (LiFMg, Cu, P )
- (termoluminiscent dosimeter)
- RPL
- (radiophotoluminiscent glass dosimeter)
18TLD (LiF Mg, Cu, P ) (termoluminiscent
dosimeter)
- High sensitivity
- In spite of its anomalous energy dependence
nearly tissue- equivalence - Agreement with earlier results
19RPL (radiophotoluminiscent glass dosimeter)
- Higher sensitivity
- Energy dependance in air is better than for
LiFMg, Cu, P (33-65 keV mean energies) - Energy dependance curve on the water phantom
changes in opposite direction than the calculated
Hp(10) values - The absolute difference from Hp(10) is not larger
than for LiFMg, Cu, P
20CONCLUSION
- The measured dose values in X-ray diagnostic unit
are in accordance with the characteristics found
in SSDL for both dosimeters. - The RPL system seems to be suitable for
dosimetric measurements in X- ray diagnostics.
21ZAGREB
22Thank you for your attention!
The authors are grateful to Chiyoda Technol
Corporation, Japan for the support of this work.