Conclusion and Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Conclusion and Evaluation

Description:

Conclusion and Evaluation IB Geo IA Conclusion Common Problems from Last Year s Class Description from Fieldwork Guide Students should summarize the findings of the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:128
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Chicago109
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conclusion and Evaluation


1
Conclusion and Evaluation
  • IB Geo IA

2
Conclusion
  • Common Problems from Last Years Class

3
Description from Fieldwork Guide
  • Students should summarize the findings of the
    fieldwork investigation. There should be a clear,
    concise statement answering the fieldwork
    question. It is acceptable for the conclusion to
    state that the findings do not match the
    students preliminary judgment or prediction.
  • The suggested length of this section for work
    appropriate to criterion E is approximately 200
    words.

4
Dont Judge!
  • Parents should be teaching their children about
    safe sex, but they are not, so they are bad
    parents.
  • This fertility rate is bad
  • Mexicans arent knowledgeable about
    contraception
  • People in Slag are lazy, dont exercise and only
    eat junk food.
  • South Deering is least safe because of the type
    of ignorant people that live there.
  • THESE ARE SWEEPING GENERALIZATIONS AND MAKES YOU
    SOUND LIKE A JERK!

This is bad parenting!!!
5
Take your opinions out
  • The only conclusions you can possibly make must
    be related to what the data tells you.
  • You cannot possibly reach this conclusion
  • This fieldwork points to a bigger problem, and
    that is that teenagers dont care about religion
    or consequences.

6
Avoid Being Vague
  • Take out any language such as the following
  • Pretty low
  • Pretty high
  • Pretty good
  • Pretty bad
  • High education
  • Good fertility rate
  • Replace with something more specific!
  • What are examples of better options?

7
Conclusion Rubric
Marks Level Descriptor
0 The work does not reach the standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There is some attempt to draw a conclusion to the fieldwork question, which may not be completely consistent with the analysis.
2 There is a clear conclusion to the fieldwork question, consistent with the analysis.
8
Evaluation
  • Common Problems from Last Years Class

9
Description from the Fieldwork Guide
  • Students should review their investigative
    methodology, including methods of collecting
    primary information. They may wish to suggest an
    alternative hypothesis. Within this, they should
    consider any factors that may have affected the
    validity of the data, including personal bias.
    They should discuss any limitations of the
    investigation and make recommendations for
    improvements and extensions. Students should
    suggest specific and plausible ways in which the
    study might have been improved and could be
    extended in the future.
  •   
  • The suggested length of this section for work
    appropriate to criterion F is approximately 300
    words.

10
Dos and Donts from IB
  • Dont use this section to do the following
  • apologize for poor data collection
  • make excuses for bad weather
  • complain about fellow students or
    questionnaire/interview participants
  • make excuses for insufficient time
  • Do use this section to
  • focus on weaknesses in sample size, assessing the
    appropriateness of techniques/methods, and
    providing some recommendations for improvements.

11
No one likes a whiner
  • Under no circumstances is this a place for you to
    complain about your group, the people you
    surveyed, or about having to do this project.
  • If my group met more often and showed up to
    meetings when they were supposed to, this data
    would have been better.
  • If people werent so ignorant and mean, they
    would have provided me with better data on the
    questionnaire.
  • If we had more time to complete this project, I
    would have done better.

12
There is still time
  • No one should be writing in their evaluation that
    they could have done better graphs and could have
    analyzed better.
  • Make better graphs
  • Analyze better
  • Whats stopping you?

13
Evaluation Rubric
Marks Level Descriptor
0 The work does not reach the standard described by the descriptors below.
1 There is either some attempt to evaluate methods of collecting fieldwork information or some suggestion is made for improvement or extension.
2 Methods of collecting fieldwork information have been evaluated or there are valid recommendations for improvements or extensions.
3 Methods of collecting fieldwork information have been evaluated clearly. There are valid and realistic recommendations for improvements or extensions. There may be some suggestions for modifying the fieldwork question.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com