Correlations between student discussion behavior, attitudes, and learning

About This Presentation
Title:

Correlations between student discussion behavior, attitudes, and learning

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Gerd Kortemeyer Last modified by: Gerd Kortemeyer Created Date: 9/11/2006 2:44:12 PM Document presentation format –

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Gerd90
Learn more at: http://www.lon-capa.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Correlations between student discussion behavior, attitudes, and learning


1
Correlations between student discussion behavior,
attitudes, and learning
  • Gerd Kortemeyer
  • Michigan State University
  • AAPT 2007 Summer Meeting

2
Overview
  • LearningOnline Network with CAPA (LON-CAPA)
  • Online Homework
  • Online Homework Discussions
  • Online Homework Discussion Analysis

3
LON-CAPA
  • LON-CAPA is a free open-source course management
    system, developed with a strong emphasis on
    science and math
  • Used at over 50 high schools and over 40
    university
  • Shared content pool with over 275,000 resources
  • Over 100,000 homework problems
  • In addition problem libraries for standard
    physics textbooks

4
Online Homework
  • The problems are randomizing
  • Every student gets a different version

5
Online Homework
  • The problems can be quite simple

6
Online Homework
  • or quite complex

7
Online Homework
  • Different types

8
Online Homework
  • Which type of homework do students profit from
    the most?
  • Which kind of student profits the most from
    homework?

9
Homework Discussions
  • Student discussions are a window into the thought
    processes of students
  • Usually done by taping students working in
    groups, transcribing, analyzing
  • Work intensive
  • Often research setting, not actual class work
  • Small groups and sample sizes

10
Homework Discussion
  • Discussion directly attached

11
Example Problem
  • A bug that has a mass mb4g walks from the center
    to the edge of a disk that is freely turning at
    32rpm. The disk has a mass of md11g. If the
    radius of the disk is R29cm, what is the new
    rate of spinning in rpm?

12
Expert Solution
  • No external torque, angular momentum is conserved
  • Bug is small compared to disk, can be seen as
    point mass

13
What do Students Learn
  • Almost all students got this problem correct in
    the end
  • Did almost all students learn the concept?
  • Did almost all students do what we expected from
    this problem?

14
Student Discussion
  • Student A What is that bug doing on a disk? Boo
    to physics.
  • Student B OHH YEAH
  • ok this should work it worked for me
  • Moments of inertia that are important....
  • OK first the Inertia of the particle is mr2
  • and of a disk is .5mr2
  • OK and angular momentum is conserved
  • IWIWo W2pi/T
  • then do this
  • .5(mass of disk)(radius)2(2pi/T original)
    (mass of bug)
  • (radius of bug0)2 (.5(mass of
    disk)(radius)2(2pi/T))
  • (mass of bug)(radius of bug)2(2pi/T)
  • and solve for T

15
Student Discussion (cont.)
  • Student C What is T exactly? And do I have to do
    anything to it to get the final RPM?
  • Student B ok so T is the period... and
    apparently it works for some and not others....
    try to cancel out some of the things that are
    found on both sides of the equation to get a
    better equation that has less numbers in it
  • Student D what did I do wrong?
  • This is what I did. initial inertia x initial
    angular velocity final
  • inertia x final angular velocity. Imr2,
    angular velocity w... so
  • my I initial was (10g)(24 cm2) and w28 rpm.
    The number
  • calculated was 161280 g cm2. Then I divided by
    final inertia to
  • solve for the final angular speed. I found final
    Inertia by
  • ( 10g 2g)(24 cm2)6912. I then found the new
    angular speed to
  • be 23.3 rpm. This was wrong...what did I do
    incorrectly?

16
Student Discussion (cont.)
  • Student H sigh Wow. So, many, little things,
    can go wrong in calculating this. Be careful.
  • None of the students commented on
  • Bug being point mass
  • Result being independent of radius
  • No unit conversions needed
  • Several wondered about the radius of the bug
  • Plug in numbers asap
  • Nobody just posted the symbolic answer
  • Lots of unnecessary pain

17
Quantitative Research
  • Classify student discussion contributions
  • Types
  • Emotional
  • Surface
  • Procedural
  • Conceptual
  • Features
  • Unrelated
  • Solution-Oriented
  • Mathematical
  • Physics

18
Classifying Discussions
Discussions from three introductory physics
courses
19
Classifying the Problems
  • Classifying the problems by question type
  • Multiple Choice (incl. Multiple Response)
  • highest percentage of solution-oriented
    discussions (that one is right)
  • least number of physics discussions
  • Ranking and click-on-image problems
  • Physics discussions highest
  • Problems with representation-translation (reading
    a graph, etc)
  • slightly less procedural discussions
  • more negative emotional discussion (complaints)

20
Degree of Difficulty
  • Harder than 0.6 more pain, no gain

21
Good Students Discuss Better?
22
Correlations
  • Force Concept Inventory (FCI)
  • Pre- and Post-Test

23
Regression
  • PostFCI5,4860,922PreFCI0,24 PercentPhysics
  • PostFCI7,6060,857PreFCI-0.042 PercentSolution
  • Meaning what?
  • Students who contribute 100 solution-oriented
    discussions on the average have 4.2 points (out
    of 30) less on the post-test, controlling for
    pre-test

24
Acknowledgements and Website
  • Support provided by
  • National Science Foundation
  • Michigan State University
  • The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  • Our partner universities
  • Visit us at http//www.lon-capa.org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com