Title: FIN 331
1FIN 331
2Learning Objectives
- Types and sources of law
- Important legal doctrines
- Classification of law
- Jurisprudence and legal reasoning
- Statutory interpretation
- Limitations on judicial power
1 - 2
3Types or Sources of Law
- Federal, state, and tribal level
- Constitution establishes governmental
structure, specific rights and duties - Example U.S. Constitution
- Statute enacted by legislative body to regulate
conduct - Example Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq. (1970) - Counties and municipalities enact ordinances
(e.g., zoning ordinance)
1 - 3
4Types or Sources of Law
- Federal, state, and tribal level
- Common Law case law (judge-made)
- Example Gribben v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
- Administrative Law agency rules to implement
enforcement of statutes - Example U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
Rule, 40CFR261
1 - 4
5Types or Sources of Law
- Issued at the chief executive level
- Executive Order under limited powers
- Examples http//www.whitehouse.gov/news/orders/
- Treaty with other nations, by the U.S.
president on behalf of the nation, ratified by
the U.S. Senate - Example The Moscow Treaty, No. 107-8 (2002)
1 - 5
6Important Doctrines
- Stare Decisis (let the decision stand)
- Doctrine of precedent applied in common law
- Example in Gribben v. Wal-Mart Stores, the
Indiana Supreme Court cited Cahoon v. Cummings
for a well-established rule about intentional
first-party spoliation of evidence - Equity
- Applied by the judiciary to achieve justice when
legal rules would produce unfair results - Examples injunction or specific performance
1 - 6
7Important Doctrines
- Federal supremacy a rule of priority for
conflicts between laws that holds the U.S.
Constitution is the supreme law of the land - Supremacy Clause, Article VI, Section 2, of the
U.S. Constitution - Practical meaning
- Federal law defeats state law
- A state constitution defeats state legislation
- A statute defeats an administrative regulation
- A statute or regulation defeats common law
1 - 7
8Classification of Law
- Criminal law establishes duties to society
- Government charges and prosecutes defendant, who
is found guilty or innocent - A convicted defendant will be imprisoned or fined
1 - 8
9Classification of Law
- Civil law establishes duties between private
parties - Plaintiff sues defendant for monetary damages or
equitable relief - A defendant will be held liable or not liable
1 - 9
10Classification of Law
- Substantive law establishes rights and duties of
people in society - Example The act of murder is a crime
- Procedural law establishes how to enforce those
rights and duties - Example A defendant charged with murder has the
right to a jury trial
1 - 10
11Classification of Law
- Public law refers to the relationship between
governments and private parties - Examples constitutional, statutory, and
administrative law - Private law refers to the regulation of conduct
between private parties - Examples contract, tort, and property laws
1 - 11
12Jurisprudence
- Jurisprudence refers to the philosophy of law as
well as the collection of laws - Legal positivism law is the command of a
recognized political authority - Just or unjust, law must be obeyed
- Natural law universal moral rules bind all
people whether written or unwritten - Unjust positive laws are invalid
1 - 12
13U.S. v. Lynch
- Facts Procedural History
- Trial court issued injunction to prohibit
defendants from further violations of a statute - Defendants moved to amend order based on natural
law argument that the statute was invalid - Trial court denied amendment, defendants appealed
- Issue Did the district court fully address and
deny defendants natural law defense? - Holding Natural law is not a valid defense.
Trial court decision affirmed.
1 - 13
14Jurisprudence
- Legal realism defines law as the behavior of the
judiciary as they rule on matters within the
legal system - Thus law in action dominates positive law
- Sociological jurisprudence unites theories that
examine law within its social context
1 - 14
15Legal Reasoning
- Basically deductive, with the legal rule as the
major premise and facts as the minor premise - Result is product of the two
- Court may stand on precedent or distinguish prior
case from current case - If precedent inapplicable, new rule developed
1 - 15
16Hagan v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
- Facts Procedural History
- Florida plaintiffs drank from bottle of Coke,
found foreign object, suffered emotional
distress, and brought suit for negligence - Jury returned verdict for plaintiffs, judge
reduced jury award, and both parties appealed - Certified question sent to Florida Supreme Court
- Question Should the impact rule (physical
injury required to state a claim) be abolished or
amended in Florida?
1 - 16
17Hagan v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
- Courts Reasoning
- Reviewed facts and arguments of parties
- Reviewed application of impact rule within
Florida, including modifications to the rule - Discussed public policy recognized by the Florida
Supreme Court in Doyle v. Pillsbury Co. - Noted court decisions in other states
- Holding Impact rule does not apply where
emotional damages are caused by conduct that is a
freestanding tort (e.g., contaminated food)
1 - 17
18Statutory Interpretation
- Plain meaning rule court applies statute
according to usual meaning of the words - Example Hyatt v. Anoka Police Department
- A court examines legislative history and purpose
when plain meaning rule is inadequate - Example What is meant by a prohibition against
discrimination because of an individuals age?
1 - 18
19General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
- Facts
- Collective bargaining agreement discriminated
against workers under 50 years of age plaintiffs
over 40 and under 50 filed a claim under the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) - Issue Does the ADEA forbid favoring the old
over the young? - Reasoning Plain meaning of age within the
statute not clear, but legislative history makes
clear that an employer may favor an older
employee over a younger one - Holding judgment reversed in favor of employer
1 - 19
20Statutory Interpretation
- Courts may interpret a statute in light of a
general public purpose or public policy - Courts follow prior interpretation of a statute
(precedent) to promote consistency - Maxims may be used to assist in statutory
interpretation - Example ejusdem generis (things of the same
type) when general words follow specific words,
the general words are limited to the same things
as specific words - Automobiles and other vehicles does not include
airplanes
1 - 20
21Limitations on Judicial Power
- Courts limited to deciding existing cases or
controversies - In other words, the dispute must be current and
not yet resolved - However, a declaratory judgment allows parties to
determine rights and duties prior to harm
occurring
1 - 21
22Limitations on Judicial Power
- Parties must have standing (direct interest in
the outcome) to sue - Whales, for example, do not have standing
- The Cetacean Community v. Bush, 386 F.3d 1169
(9th Cir. 2004)
1 - 22
23Global Business Environment
- Courts may faced with treaty interpretation
- The U.S. Supreme Court interpreted The Warsaw
Convention in Olympic Airways v. Husain - How would you have interpreted the treaty
language?
The carrier shall be liable for damage sustained
in the event of the death or wounding of a
passenger or any other bodily injury suffered by
a passenger, if the accident which caused the
damage so sustained took place on board the
aircraft or in the course of the operations of
embarking or disembarking. Warsaw Convention,
Art. 17
1 - 23