Multi-resolution Resource Behavior Queries Using Wavelets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Multi-resolution Resource Behavior Queries Using Wavelets

Description:

Multi-resolution Resource Behavior Queries Using Wavelets Jason Skicewicz Peter A. Dinda Jennifer M. Schopf Northwestern University The Tension Video Scheduling Grid ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:201
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: Jason520
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multi-resolution Resource Behavior Queries Using Wavelets


1
Multi-resolution Resource Behavior Queries Using
Wavelets
  • Jason Skicewicz
  • Peter A. Dinda
  • Jennifer M. Schopf
  • Northwestern University

2
The Tension
Video App
Sensor
Fine-grain measurement

Resource-appropriate measurement
Grid App
Resource Signal (periodic sampling) Example
host load
Course-grain measurement
3
Video Scheduling
Video App
Sensor
Fine-grain measurements needed
4
Grid Scheduling
Grid App
Sensor
Coarse-grain measurements sufficient
5
Interval Averages
Application
Sensor
Average over interval
Average over interval
Ideal Result
Adequate Result
6
Contributions / Outline
  • Application-sensor tension
  • Query model to address tension
  • Wavelets as basis for query model
  • Promising early results
  • Delay conundrum

7
Schematic Representation of Query Model
Application
Sensor

x
x
Lower bandwidth used
Measurements at fs samples/second
Desired rate at fq samples/second
The desired rate signal is an estimate error x
x

8
Application
Sensor
Query
Stream Error
x
t
t
?
?q
9
Application
Sensor
Query
Average CI
tnowinowD
(inow-N1)D
x
t
t
Application gets average over this interval
Application wants average over this interval
10
Contributions / Outline
  • Application-sensor tension
  • Query model to address tension
  • Wavelets as basis for query model
  • Promising early results
  • Delay conundrum

11
Wavelets As Basis for Query Model
  • Natural time/frequency decomposition
  • Provides a multi-resolution view of a resource
  • Well known mathematical tool
  • Invented in the 80s, hot in 90s and today
  • Linear complexity
  • Non-stationarity, other normal behaviors
    acceptable
  • Burrus, Gopinath, Gao, intro to wavelets and
    wavelet transforms A primer
  • Analytic enabler
  • Prediction on different resolutions
  • Compression of measurement streams

Queries over wavelet domain representation of
signal
12
Multi-resolution Views
13
High Level View of a 4-level Wavelet Decomposition
Sensor
Level 0
Wavelet Transform
Level 1
Wavelet Coefficients
Level 2
Level 3
  • Resource Signal is decomposed into levels
  • Samples at each level are at a different rate
  • Each level captures different frequency content
  • Corresponding inverse transform

14
4-level Wavelet DecompositionTime-frequency
Localization
Level
Frequency
0
0 fs/16
fs/16 fs/8
1
fs/8 fs/4
2
fs/4 fs/2
3
xn
0 fs/2
?
fs1/?
time
15
Example Decomposition of Host Load
Lossless representation of resource signal
16
Computing Wavelet Coefficients
  • Streaming operation
  • Number of levels, M, chosen arbitrarily
  • Amortized work per sample O(1)
  • O(n) for n samples
  • Block by block operation
  • Block of samples, n2k
  • Levels, M lg(n) 1
  • Circular convolution over block, O(n)

17
Proposed System
Application
Sensor
Network
Stream
Interval
Level 0
Level 0
Wavelet Transform
Inverse Wavelet Transform
Level L
Level M-1
Level M
Application receives levels based on its needs
18
Multi-resolution Views Using 14 Levels
19
Wavelet Compression Gains, 14 Levels
Typical appropriate number of levels for host
load, error lt 20
20
Contributions / Outline
  • Application-sensor tension
  • Query model to address tension
  • Wavelets as basis for query model
  • Promising early results
  • Delay conundrum

21
Offline Analysis System
22
Load Traces
  • DEC Unix 5 second exponential average
  • 1 Hz sample rate
  • Traces collected in August 1997
  • AXP0-PSC Interactive machine with high load
  • AXP7-PSC Batch machine
  • Sahara-CMU Large-memory compute server
  • Themis-CMU Desktop workstation
  • Windows 2000 percentage of CPU
  • 1Hz sample rate
  • Trace collected in May 2001
  • Tlab-03-NU Desktop, teaching lab machine

23
Testcases
  • Stream Queries
  • One million samples per trace
  • Interval Queries
  • 2, 8, 32, 128, 512, 2048, 8192 second intervals
  • 1000 randomized queries per interval length per
    trace

24
Performance Evaluation
  • Streaming queries metrics
  • Error variance
  • Error histograms
  • Error mean
  • Energy in error auto-covariance
  • Interval query metrics
  • Error variance
  • Error histograms
  • Error mean

Error mean 0 for all evaluations
25
Streaming Queries, Relative Error Variance
Fewer than 1 of coefficients, error lt 20
26
Streaming Queries, Error Histogram at Level 6
Errors follow a near-Gaussian distribution
27
Interval Queries, Error Variance
Error variance approaches zero as interval
increases
28
Interval Queries, Error Histograms at Level 5
Distributions not always Gaussian
29
Contributions / Outline
  • Application-sensor tension
  • Query model to address tension
  • Wavelets as basis for query model
  • Promising early results
  • Delay conundrum

30
Block By Block System Delay
M Levels
Wavelet Transform
Inverse Wavelet Transform

xn
xrn

Block
Block
n samples in block
n samples in block
Sample Acquisitions
Wavelet transform
Inverse transform
time
Samples delayed by block size
31
Streaming System Delay, Example with Length 4
Wavelets (D4), 4 Levels
Level 0
Length 22
Length 22
Level 1
Length 22
Length 22
xn
xrn-d
Level 2
Length 10
Length 10
Delay K1
Level 3
Length 4
Length 4
Delay K2
High levels delayed waiting for low frequency
computations, output delayed by high order filter
32
Delay Conclusions
  • System implementation
  • Delay must be taken into account
  • Prediction may help reduce streaming delay
  • Application scheduling
  • Fine-grain apps more sensitive to delay
  • Coarse-grain apps less sensitive to delay
  • Suggestions?

We are working on a solution!
33
Related Work
  • Database queries over wavelet coefficients
  • Shahabi, et al SSDBM 2000
  • Chakrabarti, et al VLDB 2000
  • Vitter, et al CIKM 98, SIGMOD 99
  • Network traffic analysis and modeling
  • Ribeiro, et al IEEE INFOCOM 2000
  • Riedi, et al IEEE DSPCS 99
  • Feldman, et al SIGCOMM 98
  • Wavelet theory
  • Daubechies Ten Lectures on Wavelets 92, SIAM
  • Mallat IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and
    Machine Intelligence, 89

34
Conclusions
  • Application-sensor tension
  • Query model to address tension
  • Wavelets as basis for query model
  • Promising early results
  • Delay conundrum

35
Future Work
  • Wavelets are an enabler of other techniques
  • Prediction over wavelet coefficients
  • Possibility of better results
  • Can reduce system delay
  • Further compression through processing
  • Adaptive decompositions based on resource
  • Looking at other resource streams
  • RPS implementation

36
Contact Information
  • Webpage
  • http//www.cs.northwestern.edu/jskitz
  • Email address
  • jskitz_at_cs.northwestern.edu
  • Load traces and tools
  • http//www.cs.northwestern.edu/pdinda/LoadTraces
  • Matlab scripts
  • Available by request (jskitz_at_cs.northwestern.edu)

37
Frequency Information Vs. Rate
Input Signal, xn
Decomposition
  • Frequency information retained fs/2
  • Measurement rate, fs

Q Why is this true?
A The Nyquist Criterion- sampling theory
38
Wavelet Transform, 1 Stage
LPF, HPF FIR filters
xn
yn
hn
39
Increasing Stages, Mallats Tree Algorithm
xn
Stages can be arbitrarily increased
40
Frequency Response
HPF
LPF
  • Filters must be even order for PR
  • Other special properties to retain PR
  • The filters are order N8 (D8 wavelet)

41
Reconstruction From the Wavelet Coefficients, 1
Stage
Upsampler
LPF, HPF time reversed filters, same response
42
Reconstruction From Multiple Stages, The Inverse
Wavelet Transform
Reconstructed signal is exactly the resource
43
Q How are the number of levels determined?
Answers
  • Determined by accuracy constraints
  • Determined by what levels are available
  • Determined by the rate (fq) at which measurements
    are requested

44
Example, Choosing Levels
Solution
L 2
fq fs / 6
M 4 levels
Equation Satisfied!
Levels 0, 1 and 2 coefficients returned
45
Streaming Query Tradeoffs
  • Measurement rate, fq high
  • Lower error variance
  • Higher communication costs
  • Measurement rate, fq low
  • Higher error variance
  • Very low communication costs

Wavelet approach yields accuracy at low rates
46
Interval Query Tradeoffs
  • Interval length N long
  • Less dynamic rate
  • Tighter confidence intervals
  • Interval length N short
  • More dynamic rate
  • Wider confidence intervals
  • Rate, fq high
  • Shorter interval length
  • Tighter confidence intervals
  • Rate, fq low
  • Longer interval length
  • Wider confidence intervals

Confidence interval (c) provides flexibility
47
Streaming Queries, Energy in Auto-covariance
Error becomes uncorrelated as levels added
48
Interval Queries, Error Mean (32 seconds)
Error mean is zero at 8 levels, 3 of coefficients
49
Interval Queries, Error Mean (512 seconds 8½
minutes)
As interval increases, need fewer levels
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com