Differences in Intelligence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Differences in Intelligence

Description:

Differences in Intelligence NATURE (genetic influence) Twins intelligence scores are virtually as similar to those of the same person taking a test twice. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: dean2169
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Differences in Intelligence


1
Differences in Intelligence
2
NATURE (genetic influence)
  • Twins intelligence scores are virtually as
    similar to those of the same person taking a test
    twice.
  • Identical twins show a greater correlation in
    intelligence scores than fraternal twins.
  • Brain scans show twins have very similar gray
    matter volume

3
NURTURE (environmental influence)
  • Malnutrition can influence cognitive development
  • Head Start and other programs increase childrens
    school readiness.
  • Intelligence scores tend to rise during the
    school year and drop off in the summer months.
    Argument for year round schooling.
  • Identical twins reared apart have a lower
    intelligence correlation than those reared
    together.

4
The Flynn Effect
  • Overall intelligence testing has been improving
    this is called the Flynn Effect (Graph pg. 447)
  • The avg. persons intelligence score 80 years ago
    is equal to a 76 today.
  • This trend has been observed in many countries.
  • What could cause the Flynn effect?

5
The Flynn Effect
6
Explaining the Flynn Effect
  • Better nutrition
  • Better education
  • More stimulating environments
  • Smaller families

7
Nature vs. Nurture Intelligence summary
  • Nature vs. Nurture-Intelligence YouTube

8
Ethnic Similarities and Differences
  • Genetics research reveals that under the skin,
    the races are remarkably alike.
  • Individual differences within races are much
    greater than the differences between races.
  • White and Black infants score equally well on
    infant intelligence measures.

9
Ethnic Similarities and Differences
  • The Disturbing Facts
  • Racial groups differ in their average
    intelligence scores
  • Avg. IQ for Whites 100
  • Avg. IQ for Blacks 85
  • Avg. IQ for other minorities between 85 and 100
  • Although this gap is shrinking slowly, it still
    persists.
  • Are these differences due to genetics or the
    environment?

10
Environmental Explanations for Gap
  • Self fulfilling prophecies- Gender/race-
    Stossell
  • Student beliefs about themselves-Black/white doll
  • experiment and Brown decision. Separate but
    Equal-pt.1
  • Teacher beliefs about student abilities. The
    Pygmalion Effect and the Power of Positive
    Expectations (1st 300)
  • Teachers unconscious bias when selecting who can
    take upper level classes. CMS study on 6th to
    12th grade English scores.
  • Nutrition and scores.
  • In group pressures to not "act white" Uncle Toms.

11
Environmental Explanations for IQ Gap
  • Prejudice has negative influence on achievement.
  • Ogbu study suggesting that minority groups in all
    cultures score lower on intelligence tests
    produced by majority culture.
  • Fewer role models.
  • Less of a perception of school as a means to
    better life.
  • Fewer family financial concerns.
  • (Role of TV films).
  • Look at Tom the Dancing Bug
  • How Priming Impacts Your Performance

12
Gender Differences
  • Gender differences in intelligence is minor
  • Girls are better spellers
  • Girls are more verbally affluent
  • Girls surpassed boys in memory for picture
    associations
  • Girls are sensitive to touch, taste and odor
  • Girls are better at detecting emotions
  • Boys outnumber girls in underachievement - More
    boys in special education classes
  • Boys are better at math problem solving
  • Boys spatial ability is superior

13
Stereotype Threat
  • Stereotype threat a self-confirming concern
    that one will be evaluated based on a negative
    stereotype. (self-fulfilling prophecy) p. 465
  • Ex. Women score higher on math tests when they
    are not tested alongside of men
  • Ex. Blacks score higher when tested by a black
    test administrator rather than a white test
    administrator

14
Take the Australian and Chitling Tests
  • Take tests

15
Cultural Bias in testing
  • Is there cultural bias in testing?

16
What is meant by bias?
  • Tests detect differences caused by cultural
    experiences
  • Ex. Question What is a Tobaggon?
  • And regional bias
  • A cup is paired with a saucer or you buy
    insurance to protect your property
  • AP Psych 2009 exam drivers license. Q Why is
    this bias for someone from Tokyo, Shanghai,
    Seoul.
  • If this is the case, are intelligence tests a
    vehicle for discrimination?- show quotes from
    original creators of SAT, Stanford-Binet (most
    influential standardized tests in history

17
Bias in Testing
  • TAKE STANDARDIZED TEST OF QUESTIONS THAT HAVE
    BEEN ELIMINATED DUE TO BIAS.
  • Q. WHY WERE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS CONSIDERED
    BIAS
  • ETS (Collegeboard) goes to great lengths to
    create unbias exams today. Ex.- being on the
    rubric team, roomate from Shaghai China, my
    selection.

18
Who succeeds on the SAT?
  • Studies show that upper class white male
    northeasterners tend to perform better than any
    other group. Why?
  • Test was created by white, upper-class males.
    What does being like the test creators have
    anything to do with your ability to perform well
    on a test?
  • High socio economic status vocabulary
  • Test preparation -
  • Taking test several times -
  • Any others?

19
Evidence supporting SAT Bias
  • Females have higher HS GPAs but males perform
    better on SATs
  • Over 1400 SAT scores (1600 scale)
  • 29 from upper class
  • 24 from middle class
  • 14 from lower class
  • High School performance among these
    particular students has opposite numbers.

20
Wake Forest Ends testing
  • No SATs for Wake Forest University YouTube
  • Wake Forest example lends doubt to the SATs
    McClatchy
  • A New Book Argues Against the SAT - NYTimes.com
  • Review Institutional Discrimination and
    Standardized Testing/ Homogeneous Grouping.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com