Technology Innovation Agency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Technology Innovation Agency

Description:

Technology Innovation Agency Institutional Review Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology Date: 18 September 20113 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:392
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Studi164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology Innovation Agency


1
Technology Innovation Agency Institutional Review
Report
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on
Science and Technology Date 18 September 20113
2
Presentation Outline
3
Background
4
Background cont.
  • In TIAs case, and as recommended by the
    Ministerial Review Committee, the Minister
    decided to initiate the first review to be of a
    developmental and formative nature and to
    consider both the fitness for purpose of TIA
    operations and the fitness for purpose of the TIA
    in the national system of innovation.
  • In November 2012, the Minister appointed a panel
    to conduct an external institutional review of
    the Technology Innovation Agency (TIA).

5
The Review Panel
  • The Review Panel comprised
  • Dr Khotso Mokhele (Chairperson)
  • Ms Nasima Badsha, CEO of Cape Higher Education
    Consortium
  • Dr Tarmo Lemola, Director Advansis Ltd.,
    Finland
  • Ms Khungeka Njobe, ex Managing Director of Aveng
    Water
  • Mr Cas Coovadia, Managing Director of Banking
    Association of SA

6
Purpose of the TIA Review
  • .. to reflect on the establishment and
    operations of the Agency in order to
    independently assess the strengths and
    weaknesses. This will be based on the Agencys
    current strategic plans and performance since its
    inception in 2008. The integration of the
    Biotechnology Research and Innovation Centres
    (BRICS) into TIA will be of particular
    relevance..

7
Scope of the Review
  • The original motivation for the establishment of
    TIA was to address the challenge of the low level
    of commercialisation of promising ideas that
    emerge in South Africa, particularly from
    universities and publicly-funded research
    organisations. The review panel is required to
    assess whether the organisational structures,
    policies and programmes of the TIA are fit for
    this purpose.

8
Scope of the Review cont.
  • The TIA's support for taking ideas to early
    commercialisation and successes and challenges
    that have been faced in preparing initiatives for
    full commercialisation. This includes
    risk-funding applications from entities which
    require commercialisation support as well as
    funding support from investors active in late
    stage commercialisation.

9
Scope of the Review cont.
  • The contribution that the TIA has made in
    supporting universities and publicly-funded
    research organisations in creating a culture that
    supports the commercialisation of their
    intellectual property.

10
Scope of the Review cont.
  • Evaluate the investment decision-making processes
    of TIA (including the inclusion of knowledgeable
    experts and potential partners in the process) as
    well as the adequacy and effectiveness of the
    performance monitoring systems of TIA. This could
    include comparisons with similar public
    institutions such as TEKES, the Finnish Institute
    for Technology and Innovation.

11
Scope of the Review cont.
  • Assess the progress made with the consolidation
    of various entities/programmes transferred to the
    TIA on its establishment including a review of
    how TIA dealt with the various initiatives and
    projects that it inherited, taking into account
    the primary purpose for which TIA was
    established.
  • The Review Panel may include any other areas that
    are relevant to the intentions of this review.

12
Briefings and Presentations
  • Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  • Technology Innovation Agency (Board and the
    Executive)
  • National Intellectual Property Management Office
    (NIPMO)

13
Stakeholder Interviews
  • Science councils, funding entities and other
    statutory entities in the National System of
    Innovation (NSI)
  • Government Departments
  • Higher education representatives
  • Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs)
  • Former Heads of BRICS
  • Former Innovation Fund leadership

14
Stakeholder Interviews
  • Interim CEO of the TIA
  • Technology Station Managers
  • Successful applicants to the TIA
  • Unsuccessful applicants to the TIA
  • Private Sector, including the Venture Capital
    industry representatives

15
Recommendations
16
Recommendation 1
17
Recommendation 2
18
Recommendation 2 (cont)
19
Recommendation 3
20
Recommendation 3 cont.
21
Recommendation 4
22
Recommendation 5
23
Recommendation 6
24
Recommendation 7
25
Recommendation 8
26
Recommendation 9
27
Recommendation 9 cont.
28
Recommendation 9 cont.
29
Recommendation 9 cont.
30
Recommendation 9 cont.
31
Recommendation 9 cont.
32
Recommendation 10
33
Recommendation 11
34
Recommendation 12
35
Recommendation 12 cont.
36
Way forward
37
  • THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com