Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy

Description:

Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy Nicholas Stern 2nd Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury and Head of the Government Economic Service – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Hals56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy


1
Inclusion, Changing Preferences, and Public Policy
  • Nicholas Stern
  • 2nd Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury and Head
    of the Government Economic Service

2
Overview
  1. Development as a process of change
  2. A strategy for development two pillars
  3. Spotlight on the second pillar promoting
    empowerment, participation, and inclusion
  4. The dynamics of preferences
  5. Concluding comments on expanding theory of public
    policy

3
Part I Development as a Process of Change
  • Progress on living standards beneficial change
    in the developing world
  • Meanings what poor people say conceptual
    frameworks.
  • Dramatic changes in education and health over the
    last 30 years
  • Perspective over two centuries

4
Development as a Process of Change
First fall in absolute numbers in 2 centuries
dominated by East Asia
5
Development as a Process of Change
  • What does change not consist of?
  • Progress has not resulted from steady
    accumulation of capital (physical or human or
    social) within a static or dynamically simplistic
    single-good framework
  • Formal models of growth and development are
    usually superficial or silent on the most
    important features of the development process

6
Development as a Process of Change
  • Instead, development characterized by
  • Fits and starts in growth
  • Massive structural changes in economy and society
  • Global integration
  • Striking changes in preferences and behaviour
    (focus of todays discussion) and ways of living

7
Part II A Strategy for Development
  • Lessons of 50 years of development on spurring
    the right type of changes
  • Two-pillar strategy for development
  • Pillar 1 Improving the investment climate
  • Pillar 2 Empowering poor people and promoting
    participation in development

8
A Strategy for Development
  • Governance, institutions, and behaviour central
    to both pillars
  • Each of governance, institutions, and behaviour
    has a conceptually distinct role, although they
    overlap and interact
  • Behaviour is often missing from story

9
A Strategy for Development
  • Pillar 1 Improving investment climate
  • Purpose
  • Build a climate promoting growth, employment, and
    innovation in private sector
  • Emphasises farms and small enterprises
  • Elements of that climate
  • Stable macro and openness
  • Infrastructure
  • Governance and institutions

10
Part III Empowerment and Participation
  • What does empowerment mean?
  • Gaining control over ones own life
  • Essential to development effectiveness
  • In management of schools and water projects
  • In security of property rights
  • In improvements in health status
  • In monitoring government performance
  • And it is central to poor peoples definition of
    their poverty (Voices of the Poor)

11
Empowerment and Participation
  • Empowerment having the ability to shape ones
    life, or to participate effectively (ingredients)
  • Determinants of /constraints on empowerment
  • Poor individual endowments HD
  • External constraints created by family, social,
    cultural, and political context
  • Internal constraints the lack of a capacity to
    aspire

12
Empowerment and Participation
Determinants of Empowerment
  • Individual Endowments
  • Assets
  • Human Capital
  • External Constraints
  • Family
  • Community (Caste, Religion)
  • Society
  • Governance

Empowerment
  • Internal Constraints
  • Perceptions of own role
  • Preferences
  • Capacity to aspire

13
Empowerment and Participation
  • Empowerment and inclusion similar but not
    identical concepts
  • Empowerment is relevant even when we look at
    individual in isolation
  • Inclusion focuses on
  • social interactions within a community
  • action by agents who may force exclusion
  • factors that go across generations
  • In practice, both often identify key policy
    issues and challenges and imply similar policies

14
Empowerment and Participation
  • Can we measure empowerment?
  • Household surveys
  • Focus on outcomes, including HD outcomes
  • Need to disaggregate by social status, gender
  • Surveys of governance
  • Surveys of attitudes and aspirations
  • Surveys measuring shocks, such as natural
    disasters and crime
  • Surveys of public service delivery (QSDS/PETS)

15
Part IV The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Empowerment will often be associated with
    changing preferences
  • Indeed, policies to enhance empowerment are often
    focused on changing preferences/behaviour
  • Distinguish preferences and behaviour
  • Development is accompanied by momentous changes
    in preferences (with rural-urban migration,
    education of women, etc.)
  • This makes increasingly untenable the
    comprehensive assumption of constant preferences

16
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Why preference change matters five examples
  • Shift in attitudes with industrialisation or
    urbanisation (Tawney)
  • Promoting the education of girls
  • Attitudes toward women in the workforce
  • Race relations
  • Changing standards in economic transitions

17
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Assessing reforms or optimising policy with fixed
    preferences
  • Very fruitful approach for much of modelling and
    policy (e.g., theory of taxation and economic
    regulation)
  • Behaviours in terms of actions change if
    incentives or information change in a manner
    modelled via fixed preferences
  • If a state of affairs is preferred by one
    individual and not ranked lower by any other, it
    is socially preferred (SWF is based- positively-
    on individual preferences)
  • Provides clear answers

18
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Without the constant-preference assumption, we
    have 2 options for understanding behaviour
  • Retain formal preferences and model how
    preferences change over time
  • Abandon preferences, and focus on understanding
    how opportunities capabilities change over time
  • Different approaches to policy are associated
    with these approaches
  • For the former, we have to decide how to treat
    (e.g., weight) conflicting preferences
  • For the latter, we have to be able to identify
    expansions of ability to shape own life
  • Both approaches will leave important ambiguities

19
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • First approach attempt to integrate into
    neoclassical public economics
  • Retains preference orderings, and struggles to
    make comparisons
  • Examples
  • Meta-utility function
  • Utility function with preferences over
    fundamental goods or wants
  • Experience effects

20
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • The challenge of assessing well-being when
    preferences change
  • To judge the welfare effects of a policy, should
    we use todays preferences, or tomorrows or
    something else?

21
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • To assess policy change in this type of approach
    often requires something akin to paternalism
  • State acts in support of higher self against
    wishes of lower self, when preferences are
    expected to evolve
  • State overrides preferences where it believes
    they should be changed
  • May be some mileage in partial orderings where
    rankings relative to two preference orderings are
    consistent, but strong interest in cases where
    there is conflict in rankings

22
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Alternative approach focuses on processes e.g.
    Austrian school/ Sen approach
  • Looks beyond preference orderings
  • Works in terms of freedoms and capabilities,
    rather than utilities
  • Provides a new basis for policy advice assess
    development effects in terms of expanding freedoms

23
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Expansion of freedoms as a criterion for policy
    choice has a basis in some strands of political
    philosophy
  • Nozicks view asserts inviolable freedoms
  • Berlins assessments of states, governments and
    policies but insistence on pluralism and
    warnings on simplistic, single-criterion,
    formulations of decision-making

24
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Implication of the Austrian/Sen approach
  • Focus of policymaking should be less on comparing
    outcomes
  • And more on processes for decisionmaking
  • Examples
  • Ait Iktel in Morocco
  • Sonagachi anti-AIDS efforts in Kolkata

25
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Validity or legitimacy of action to change
    preferences again processes
  • Examples show the importance of building mutual
    trust through co-operation and mutual commitment
  • Connects to literature of Tocqueville, Mill,
    Dewey on political interaction and changing
    preferences
  • Market itself is an arena for these social
    processes

26
The Dynamics of Preferences
  • Viewing social actions this way has profound
    implications for preference change and policy
    choice
  • Not top-down preference change, but processes of
    social decision making
  • There are many challenges in implementation,
    particularly where inequalities and exclusion are
    severe

27
Part V Concluding Comments
  • Evidence of development as fundamental change
    plus objectives in terms of empowerment
    inclusion point to strategy focusing on
    processes, as exemplified by two pillars here
  • Together the evidence, objectives, and strategy
    lead us to re-examine basics of theory of public
    policy
  • Much of development policy is, or should be,
    focused on changing institutions preferences

28
Part V Concluding Comments
  • Have focused here on changing preferences
  • Changing institutions/governance is another
    lecture
  • But we have learned something on changing
    governance
  • transparency
  • economic structure avoiding discretion
  • civil service reform
  • leadership

29
Concluding Comments
  • If we follow this analysis and direction through,
    we will create a new approach to the theory
    practice of public policy which builds on but
    goes far beyond standard public economics
  • At same time will bring different social sciences
    together in understanding policy and the role of
    the state
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com