Interpreting the Bill of Rights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Interpreting the Bill of Rights

Description:

Interpreting the Bill of Rights Chapter 6 Section 3 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Patr6155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interpreting the Bill of Rights


1
Interpreting the Bill of Rights
  • Chapter 6
  • Section 3

2
Key Terms
  • Freedom of the Press
  • Freedom of Speech
  • Case Studies

3
  • Freedom of the press- the right to publish
    newspapers, magazines. And other materials
    without government restrictions
  • Is government endangering rights when it passes
    libel laws that forbid people to print damaging
    false statements?

4
  • Freedom of speech- the to express ones opinion
    publicly
  • Does the person have the right to make a speech
    that causes a riot?

5
Role of the Courts
  • Judges in courts interpret the meaning of
    citizens rights
  • 1st court is the local court
  • 2nd would be state courts
  • Some cases go to the Supreme Court
  • Case Studies- which are descriptions of
    conflicts, the issues involved, and the decisions
    made.
  • Case studies help us see principles of the
    constitution, when you read them think of what
    you would do.

6
Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Einhart
  • Des Moines Iowa
  • Protest Viet Nam War
  • Mary Beth 13 Christopher 16
  • Wore black armbands with peace signs on their
    arms
  • Felt it was their right to protest
  • Had important implications for Freedom of Speech

7
Supreme Court Heard the Case
  • Des Moines school officials forbade the wearing
    of armbands
  • Students were suspended
  • Parents argued freedom of speech
  • Students did not disrupt class
  • School said it preserved discipline
  • Argued school not the place for political
    demonstrations

8
Court Decisions
  • Local Court ruled in favor of the school
  • Higher Court upheld the school
  • Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students
  • Armbands are a part of free speech
  • Symbols representing ideas
  • Because it did not interfere with other students

9
The Skokie Case Freedom for Nazis?
  • When is freedom of expression limited?
  • What other rights should be considered?
  • What if the person expresses ideas that people
    find shocking?
  • One of the most controversial cases in our
    nations history.

10
Background
  • 1930 members of Adolph Hitlers Nazi party
    attacked Jews in Germany between 1938 and 1945
  • Nazis forced millions of Jews into camps and
    tortured, starved and killed them.

11
Conflict
  • 1977 Skokie Illinois
  • Towns residents 40,000 Jews
  • Many people had survived Nazi Camps
  • May uniformed men applied for a permit to march
    through Skokie
  • American Nazi Party
  • Each wore large swastikas

12
  • Skokie officials wanted to stop the march
  • Made Nazis obtain 350,000.00 in insurance to
    discourage the march
  • When Nazis wanted to protest the insurance
  • The town forbade them to march in nazi uniforms
    with swastikas

13
Court Battle
  • Illinois Court to the Supreme Court
  • Does 1st amendment protect the Nazi message of
    hatred
  • People argued 1st Amendment does not protect
    people who want to destroy freedom and spread
    violence
  • ACLU argued Nazis have a voice

14
  • Basic question
  • If government may deny freedom of expression to
    one group, what will prevent it denying the right
    to any other group?
  • The First amendment must be for everyone or it
    will be for no one.

15
Appealing the Case
  • American Nazi party would not accept the county
    court order
  • Took case to Illinois Supreme Court
  • Supreme Court would not overrule the lower court
  • June 14, 1977 Supreme Court ordered Illinois
    Court to hold a hearing on their Nazi decision

16
  • It took a year
  • The insurance violated First Amendment
  • Insurance was too costly
  • Limited freedom of assembly
  • Nazis won the right to hand out hate literature

17
  • First Amendment protects expression of all ideas
  • Drew upon precedents of free speech
  • No matter how cruel or unpopular
  • The principle of free-thought- not free thought-
    for those who agree with us but freedom for the
    that that we hate.

18
Symbols of Speech
  • The courts discussed whether the Nazi symbol was
    protected under free speech
  • As decided in the Tinker Case
  • Issue whether the Nazi symbol would cause a
    violent reaction
  • Were Nazis trying to start a fight

19
  • Court decides the swastikas could not be banned
  • Summer 1978 Nazis held rallies but not in Skokie
  • Both rallies were in Chicago
  • Thousands demonstrated against the Nazis
  • Heavy guard of police to protect them

20
A Marketplace of Ideas
  • First amendment protects popular and unpopular
    ideas.
  • Holmes thought people should hear many different
    views
  • The powers of thought to get itself accepted in
    the competition of the market.
  • Protection of rights is not just the
    responsibility of law and judges we all share it
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com