In the name of GOD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

In the name of GOD

Description:

Inclusion criteria: clinical diagnose of Ant-lat impingement synd. , Exclusion criteria: simultaneous OA of the hip and/or lumbar spine, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: acir150
Category:
Tags: god | impingement | name

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In the name of GOD


1
In the name of GOD
2
Kneeling ability after total knee replacement in
patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
  • M. Mardani Kivi MD.
  • Guilan University of Medical Sciences

3
Rasht
Kish Island
4
Poursina Hospital
5
Osteoarthritis
  • 40 of the population over 70 years of age
    suffers from osteoarthritis of the knee and by
    the year 2020 this figure is expected to rise by
    66-100.

6
Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • over 500,000 TKAs being performed, on average, in
    the United States annually.

7
Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • In 2001, 171,335 primary TKAs were performed.
  • Demand for primary TKA is projected to grow in
    the USA to 3.48 million procedures by 2030.
  • By 2015, medical expenses for this procedure in
    the United States are calculated to increase to a
    staggering 40.8 billion.

8
Kneeling
9
Kneeling
  • Most of the functional scoring systems quoted in
    literature use pain, the ability to walk or to
    ascend and descend stairs, the use of a walking
    aid, etc. as measurements of outcome. The ability
    to kneel is often ignored.

10
Aim of the Study
  • The lack of literature addressing the specific
    concerns of a large percentage of our Iranian
    patients with their particular cultural habits,
    regarding the capacity to which they will be able
    to kneel post-operatively, has motivated us to
    investigate kneeling ability after TKA in
    patients with OA of the knee.

11
Methods and Materials
12
Methods and Materials
13
Variables were assessed 3 times pre-op, one year
post-op, and during the final follow-up visit.
14
Kneeling
15
Kneeling
16
Post-op Rehabilitation
  • Post operatively along with Physiotherapy, which
    included a special program for knee flexion,
    patients were also encouraged to kneel vigorously
    and frequently.

17
  • Group A and B were analyzed for changes in
    kneeling ability.

18
Results
  • Total patient population144?114 were possible to
    follow-up
  • Mean age 67.96.2 years (range52 to 81)
  • Sex 69 female (60.5), 45 male (39.5)
  • Mean follow-up length 26.72.4 months (Range14
    to 44)

19
Scoring
Score Pre-op 1-year f/up Final f/up P-value
VAS 9.24 0.7 1.82 1.04 2.01 1.19 plt0.0001
KSS 59.79 4.54 89.07 5.63 89.82 5.11 plt0.0001
FKS 59.57 4.48 87.72 5.21 88.23 5.36 plt0.0001
20
Kneeling results
Pre-op
Post-op
21
Complications
22
Discussion
  • Similar to other studies, Our study showed a
    statistically significant improvement in
    functional outcome (KSS, FKS) and pain relief
    (VAS) after TKA.
  • Ahmad Hafiz et al, 2011
  • Tahmasebi et al, 2009
  • Dierick et al, 2004

23
Factors affecting kneeling after TKA
24
Kneeling and prosthesis type
  • A meta-analysis using results from 130 studies
  • Although more recent studies have shown data to
    be more in favor of PCL substituting prostheses.

25
Kneeling and surgical technique
26
Kneeling and cultural differences
  • Yoshino et al. The unintentional passive
    ?exion exercise imparted by the Japanese
    sitting-style appears to be important in
    achieving and maintaining full knee ?exion after
    TKA.
  • In Iran eating traditionally on the ground and
    praying

27
Kneeling and misinformation
  • No study has supported that kneeling repetitively
    may damage knee prostheses.
  • Palmer et al. (2002)

28
Kneeling and misinformation
  • Radiographic study has shown that forces exerted
    from the femur to knee joint

29
Kneeling and misinformation
  • Schai et al. and Palmer et al. showed that
    kneeling ability, when measured objectively, is
    greater than when measured subjectively after
    TKA.

30
Kneeling and misinformation
  • Jenkins et al. (2008) a single-blind randomized
    controlled trial? The improvement in
    patient-reported kneeling ability was thought to
    be due to the kneeling intervention provided and
    not to any of the previously reported barriers to
    kneeling such as scar position, numbness, range
    of ?exion, involvement of other joints, and pain.

31
Radiographic Shopping
  • A 68 Y/O Female
  • DJD

32
Radiographic Shopping
33
Radiographic Shopping
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Take home message
  • There is no need to prohibit patients from
    Kneeling after Total Knee Replacement.

37
With Regards
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com