HOW TO WRITE A GOOD PAPER - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

HOW TO WRITE A GOOD PAPER

Description:

HOW TO WRITE A GOOD PAPER Jehan-Fran ois P ris jfparis_at_uh.edu The twenty percent rule To be significant, your contribution should be at least 20 percent better than ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Jehan77
Learn more at: https://www2.cs.uh.edu
Category:
Tags: good | how | paper | write | future | perfect | tense

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HOW TO WRITE A GOOD PAPER


1
HOW TO WRITEA GOOD PAPER
  • Jehan-François Pârisjfparis_at_uh.edu

2
Introduction
  • You have interesting results
  • You have learned to write correct English
  • Now
  • Your adviser tells you it is time to write a
    paper
  • You have to wrap up your term paper
  • What should you do?

3
What we will cover today
  • How to present your results
  • Cover the basic parts of a scientific paper
  • Focus on what to say in each of them
  • Review a few basic rules to follow

4
How to present your results
  • Your results should be interesting
  • Improve upon the state of the art
  • In a significant manner
  • It is your job to explain that to the reader

5
The twenty percent rule
  • To be significant, your contribution should be at
    least 20 percent better than state of the art
    solutions
  • Picking the right performance index is important
  • Increasing a cache it ration from 96 to 98
    percent is less impressive than cutting in half
    its miss ratio!

6
Your future paper (I)
  • Five classical parts
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Review of previous work
  • Your own contribution
  • Conclusion
  • Followed by a list of references

7
Your future paper (II)
  • An alternative organization
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Your own contribution
  • Review of previous work
  • Conclusion
  • Followed by a list of references

8
Which one should you pick?
  • Pick the traditional organization if your paper
    builds upon previous work
  • If your own work addresses some issues that were
    not addressed by previous authors
  • Pick the alternative organization otherwise
  • Lets the reader go straight from the introduction
    to the section describing your own work

9
The abstract (I)
  • Not an introduction
  • A very brief summary of the results of the paper
  • Describe the problem
  • Sketch the approach
  • Present you best results
  • The idea is to entice the reader to read further

10
The abstract (II)
  • No need to explain why the results are important
  • Introduction is there for that!
  • Must be self-contained
  • No unexplained acronyms
  • No references!
  • Use very sparingly mathematical symbols
  • Write it last!

11
The introduction (I)
  • Should present the topic and the scope of your
    paper
  • Key objectives are
  • explaining what you will do (and not do)
  • making it sound interesting
  • captatio benevolentiae
  • getting the goodwill of the reader

12
The introduction (II)
  • Main difficulty
  • Must describe the problem and your results in
    very general terms
  • Must simplify things without being inaccurate
  • Some authors end the introduction by a roadmap of
    the paper
  • Section II of this paper reviews

13
The review of previous work
  • Mention previous work that is relevant to your
    paper
  • The key word is mention
  • You should not describe in any detail any
    previous work unless it is necessary for the
    understanding of your own work
  • Do not sweat it!

14
Your own contribution (I)
  • Explain in a few lines its scope
  • You will investigate an idea that you find
    interesting
  • You have a better idea that solves one of the
    problems other proposals did not solve
  • Then develop your ideas

15
Your own contribution (II)
  • Unless you present the first known solution to a
    problem, you should compare the performance of
    your solution to that of previous solutions
  • May require running experiments or simulations
    that evaluate these solutions
  • Not always possible

16
Checklist (I)
  • Do not forget to mention the limitations of your
    approach
  • Markov models of disk arrays must assume that
    disk repair times follow an exponential
    distribution
  • Not true!
  • Necessary for having a tractable model

17
Checklist (II)
  • Be sure you present your results the best you can
  • Tables
  • Graphs
  • Do not forget to label the axes and the curves
    and to indicate the units

18
Checklist (III)
  • Use an equation editor for your equations
  • Avoid
  • ax2 bx c
  • All variables used in the text must be italicized
  • The number n of disks in the array

19
The conclusion
  • Should summarize the results of the paper
  • Overlaps with abstract
  • Often written in perfect tense
  • Research papers often include directions for
    future work
  • Many people read the conclusion first before
    deciding if the whole paper is worth their time
  • Should summarize your main results

20
The list of references (I)
  • Normally appears as an unnumbered section
  • Very important part of paper
  • Indication of good scholarship
  • Format obeys to strict conventions
  • Another indication of good scholarship
  • Take it very seriously

21
The list of references (II)
  • Always cite papers describing pioneering work
  • First paper on broadcasting for video-on-demand
    was by Viswanathan and Imielinski
  • Must be cited even though much better techniques
    have been devised
  • In case of doubt, cite the papers that other
    people cite

22
We almost forgot the title
  • Should be descriptive
  • Might be affected by the target audience

23
And the list of authors
24
In reality
  • Very poor taste not to mention as co-authors the
    names of the people supervising your work
  • Mentioning people without their permission is
    almost unforgivable
  • Jim Grays rule
  •  "He who types the paper is first author." 

25
Theses and dissertations
  • Typically follow the classical organization
  • Chapter I Introduction
  • Chapter II Previous Work
  • Chapter III to ?? Your own contributions
  • Chapter ??1 Conclusion
  • Summary
  • Directions for Future Works
  • References

26
Writing the paper (I)
  • Avoid the passive voice
  • BADThree different block sizes were selected
    for our experiments
  • BETTERWe selected three different block sizes
    for our experiments

27
Writing the paper (II)
  • Use short sentences
  • Uses figures whenever it helps
  • You can borrow figures as long as you acknowledge
    your source
  • Figure 9. A page table (from 9)
  • where 9 is a reference to a paper you cite

28
Tables and figures (I)
  • Tables have titles that are above the table

29
Tables and figures (II)
  • Figures have captions below them
  • Make your table titles and figure captions as
    self-explanatory as possible
  • Many readers will look at the tables and figures
    before reading the text

30
Other rules to follow (I)
  • Spell numbers at the beginning of a sentence
  • BAD52 of the observations
  • BETTERFifty-two percent of the observations

31
Other rules to follow (II)
  • AWFUL3 different block sizes were selected
  • BADThree different block sizes were selected
  • BETTERWe selected three different block sizes

32
Other rules to follow (III)
  • Spell out percent everywhere in your text
  • BADWe observed a 20 increase
  • BETTERWe observed a 20 percent increase

33
Other rules to follow (IV)
  • Its is not a possessive
  • BADIts main disadvantage
  • BETTERIts main disadvantage
  • Its is a contracted form of it is
  • Most good writers avoid these forms in scientific
    papers and reports
  • youre, cant

34
A last word
  • Good writing is a craft
  • You must exercise it to become better at it
  • Good writing takes time and effort
  • Will become more enjoyable as you progress
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com