Title: Cameron Tapp
1OZONE for DISINFECTION
- Cameron Tapp
- ClearWater Tech, LLC.
2Ozone Basics
- History of Ozone
- How Ozone is Generated
3History of Ozone
- First discovered in 1840
- From the Greek word ozein, which means to
smell - 1886 Europeans recognize the ability of ozone
to disinfect polluted water - 1893 First full scale application using
ozone for drinking water in Oudshoorn, Netherlands
4History of Ozone
- 1906 Ozone first used to disinfect drinking
water in Nice, France - 1915 At least 50 major ozone installations on
line throughout Europe - 1937 First commercial swimming pool to use
ozone in the U.S.A. - 1939 Ozone system displayed at the New York
Worlds Fair as the future of water treatment - 1940s Ozone first used in U.S.A. to disinfect
- municipal drinking water
5History of Ozone
- 1990s Ozone gains acceptance in a wide variety
of applications - - City of Los Angeles - 12,000 PPD
- - City of Dallas - 16,000 PPD
- - Also used to treat
- Waste water
- Bottled water
- Swimming pools spas
- Aquariums
- Cooling towers
- Soft drinks, breweries, wineries
- Food processing
-
6How Ozone is Generated
Ozone (O3)
Oxygen (O2)
O3
O1
O2
Some O2 molecules break apart
Ultraviolet Light or Corona Discharge
And reassemble with other O2 molecules to form
ozone
O3
O2
O1
7How Ozone is Generated
- Man replicates nature to produce ozone in two
ways - 1. By forcing oxygen or ambient air past
an ultraviolet light source matching the
ozone-producing wavelength of the suns rays
- (185 nanometers)
2. By sending a lightning-like spark (a
corona discharge) through an oxygen or dry
air flow
8How Ozone is Generated
- Ozone is highly unstable, and the action
involved in killing the microorganisms it
contacts causes it to revert back to its original
state of biatomic oxygen (O2)
9How Ozone is Generated
- 1. Dried air or oxygen is passed through a gap
between a glass dielectric and the anode
2. High voltage current is applied to the
anode, which arcs to the cathode. Air in the
gap is exposed to the
electrical discharge, converting a
percentage (1 to 14) of the oxygen to ozone
10What Ozone Does Not Do
- Ozone is incapable of oxidizing radon,
methane or nitrite ion - Below pH 9, ozone is incapable of oxidizing
ammonia at any practical rate - Ozone cannot practically oxidize any of the
trihalomethanes, except very slowly
11What Ozone Does Not Do
- Ozone cannot oxidize chloride ion to produce
free chlorine at any practical rate - Ozone cannot oxidize calcium, magnesium,
bicarbonate, or carbonate ions consequently,
ozone cannot oxidize hardness or alkalinity ions
12What Ozone Does
- Disinfection
- Ozone kills bacteria, cysts etc. up to 3,125
times faster than traditional methods - Taste and Odor Control
- Ozone oxidizes the organics responsible for 90
of taste and odor-related problems (e.g. tannin
and color removal)
For Problem Water
13What Ozone Does
- Algae Control
- Ozone effectively kills plankton algae (e.g.
ponds and water features) - Oxidation
- Ozones high oxidation potential can remove many
pesticide residuals (e.g. groundwater
remediation) - Preoxidation
- Ozones high oxidation potential can also
precipitate iron, manganese, sulfide and metals
more quickly than any other commonly used
oxidants, aiding removal by direct filtration
For Problem Water
14Relative Oxidation Reduction Potential of
Oxidizing Species
Relative Oxidation Reduction Power
Oxidation Reduction Potential Volts
Species
- Fluorine 3.06 2.25
- Hydroxyl Radical 2.80 2.05
- Atomic Oxygen 2.42 1.78
- Ozone 2.07 1.52
- Hydrogen Peroxide 1.77 1.30
- Perhydroxyl Radicals 1.70 1.25
- Permanganate 1.67 1.22
- Hypochlorous Acid 1.49 1.10
- Chlorine 1.36 1.00
- Bromine .78 .57
- Based on chlorine as a Relative Oxidation
Reduction Power of 1.00
15Oxidation of Typical Contaminants - Iron
- Divalent ferrous iron (Fe2) oxidizes to
trivalent ferric iron (Fe3), which precipitates
as ferric hydroxide - Rapid reaction
- Best at pH over 7, preferably over 7.5
- Theoretical amount of ozone to oxidize 1mg/L
Fe is .43 mg/L - If complexed with organics, longer contact
times and higher doses are recommended
For Problem Water
16Oxidation of Typical Contaminants - Manganese
- Divalent manganese (Mn2) oxidizes to
tetravalent (Mn4), hydrolyzing to insoluble
manganese oxydihydroxide - Over oxidation will produce soluble
permanganate ion (indicated by pink tint to
water) - Optimum pH range is 7.5 - 8.5
- Theoretical amount of ozone to oxidize 1 mg/L
Mn is .87 mg/L
For Problem Water
17Oxidation of Typical Contaminants - Sulfide Ion
- Hydrogen sulfide ion is oxidized to soluble
sulfate ion and insoluble - sulfur
- Rapid reaction
- Theoretical amount of ozone to
- oxidize 1 mg/L sulfide ion is 1.5 mg/L
For Problem Water
18Oxidation of Typical Contaminants - Color
- Primarily composed of humic and fulvic acids
- No set dosage
- Complete color removal typically requires high
dosages - Filtration not always necessary
For Problem Water
19Sizing Basics
- Preoxidation system for iron, manganese and
sulfide removal
Ozone Required To Treat
Stoichiometric Practical 1 PPM Iron
(Fe) Requires .43 PPM .5 -.14 PPM
1 PPM Manganese (Mn) Requires .88 PPM
1.5 - .6 PPM 1PPM Sulfide (S2) Requires
6 PPM 1.5 - .5 PPM
20Example Applied Dosage Calculation
Ozone Dosage Required for Iron/manganese
Removal (Water flow at 10 gpm with 1.3 PPM Iron
and .22 Manganese) Ozone Dosage Required
1.3 (Fe) X .43 (O3) .56 ppm
.22 (Mn) X .88 (O3) .19 ppm Ozone
Required .75 ppm Dosage added for
unknown demand .75 ppm Recommended Total
Ozone Dosage 1.50 ppm 1.50 (dosage) X
10 gpm X .012 X 19 3.42
g/h .012 is the constant for conversion from
gallons per minute (GPM) to pounds per day (PPD)
while 19 is the number of grams per hour in a
pound per day. In this example, 3.42 g/h is the
output of the ozone generator required.
Sizing Basics
21(No Transcript)
22Factors That Affect System Performance
- Fluctuations in water temperature
- Changes in water contamination levels
- Changes in water flow rate
- Varying atmospheric conditions
Sizing Basics
23Mass Transfer Basics
- Definition The movement of molecules of a
substance to and across an interface from one
phase to another - i.e. The amount (mass) of ozone that transfers
from air, across the air-water interface and into
water
24Mass Transfer Basics
- Factors affecting transfer of a gas into a
liquid - Pressure As pressure increases, more gas is
forced into the liquid - Temperature of the water/gas mixture At lower
temperatures, ozone gas is more easily absorbed
by the liquid. At higher temperatures, water
tends to release gas rather than absorb it - Bubble size As a gas is broken into more small
bubbles, the total bubble surface area increases,
enlarging the area for interaction between ozone
and water - Concentration of ozone in the carrier gas
Increased concentration of ozone enhances the
ability of ozone to be absorbed into water
25Ozone Contact Time
- The Contact Vessel
- An integral part of any ozone system
- Allows time for chemical reactions
(precipitation) to occur - Allows time for disinfection to occur
- Allows for ozone dissolution
- Allows for off-gassing of any remaining carrier
gas and ozone not dissolved into the water
26CT Value Defined
- C the residual concentration of the
disinfectant (expressed in mg/L) measured at or
before the first point of consumption - T The contact time (expressed in minutes)
required for water to travel from the point of
injection to the point where C is measured - Example A 0.4 residual after 4 minutes of
contact time will yield a value of 1.6 - (.4 x 4 1.6)
- Tables have been established to help determine CT
values required for certain levels of
disinfection at various water temperatures and pH
readings
Contact Time
27- CT Values for Giardia Cyst Inactivation by Ozone
- (pH can be anywhere between 6 and 9) at
various water temperatures - (Source EPA, SWTR Guidance Manual, October,
1990) - Removal 0.5C 5C 10C 15C 20C 25C
- 33F 41F 50F 59F 68F 77F
- 0.5 log 0.48 0.32 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.08
- 1.0 log 0.97 0.63 0.48 0.32 0.24 0.16
- 1.5 log 1.50 0.95 0.72 0.48 0.36 0.24
- 2.0 log 1.90 1.30 0.95 0.63 0.48 0.32
- 2.5 log 2.40 1.60 1.20 0.79 0.60 0.40
- 3.0 log 2.90 1.90 1.40 0.95 0.72 0.48
- CT Values for Giardia Cyst Inactivation by Free
Chlorine Water temperature at 20C (68F)
at various pH readings - Removal lt6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 lt9.0
- 0.6 log 38 45 54 64 77 92 109
- 1.0 log 39 47 56 67 81 98 117
- 1.6 log 42 50 59 72 87 105 126
- 2.0 log 44 52 62 75 91 110 132
- 2.6 log 46 55 66 80 97 117 141
28Significant Points About CT
- Ozone kills bacteria very quickly and
effectively on contact - Viruses and cysts, respectively, require
increasingly greater CT values. To maximize CT
effectiveness, longer contact times should be
emphasized over higher ozone concentrations - Disinfectants for which CT values have been
established - Free Chlorine
- Chloramines
- Chlorine Dioxide
- Ozone
29Typical Installation
Surface water
Clarification
Residual Sanitizer Added
Ozone Contactor
Filtration
30Benefits of Ozone Use
- Generated on site
- No transportation, storage or handling
challenges - More powerful than chlorine
- Chlorines relative oxidation reduction power
- 1.00. Ozone 1.52.
- Reverts to oxygen leaving no telltale taste or
- odor to be removed
- Greatly simplifies water chemistry, control
- and convenience.
31Benefits of Ozone Use
- Creates no carcinogenic by-products, i.e.,
trihalomethanes (THMs) - New surface water treatment plants require
ozone to meet modern THM regulations - Ozones only by-product is oxygen
- Ozone is the only recognized disinfectant
capable of practical inactivation of
Cryptosporidium oocysts with CT requirements
about 3 to 5 times those for Giardia cysts
32Large Commercial Ozone Plant
750 PPD
33Skid-Mounted Package Plant
650 PPD
34Installing Dielectrics
35Commercial Units
1 mgd Small Community Plant
36Disinfection Technology Comparison
ClearWater Tech, LLC
37Applicability of Disinfection Techniques
38Chlorine Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- Readily available
- Known technology
- Long half life
- Simplicity
- Disadvantages
- High CT values
- Highly toxic
- pH dependent
- Transportation issues
39Ozone Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- Low CT values
- No by-products
- Strongest oxidizer commercially available
- Generated on site
- Effective for THM control
- Effective against Crypto
- Disadvantages
- Capital cost
- Larger footprint
- Higher service and maintenance
40UV Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- High reliability
- No by-products
- Generated on site
- Effective against viruses and bacteria
- Disadvantages
- Initial capital cost
- No chemical residual
- Higher service
- requirements
41Conclusion
- No single water treatment method is the
panacea for all types of water conditions.
Typically, using the combined strengths of
several methods will produce the best overall
results.
42