Back to Basics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Back to Basics

Description:

Electronic Patient Registry Essentials Adam Baus MA, MPH West Virginia University Department of Community Medicine Office of Health Services Research – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: abau2
Category:
Tags: back | basics | fqhc

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Back to Basics


1
Back to Basics Electronic Patient Registry
Essentials
  • Adam Baus MA, MPH
  • West Virginia University Department of Community
    Medicine
  • Office of Health Services Research
  • National CDEMS Support Group Webinar
  • 01/27/2010

2
Special Thanks to Our Funders
  • This presentation was supported by
    Grant/Cooperative Agreement Numbers
    U32/CCU322734, U59/CCU324180-03, U50/CCU321344
    from the Centers for Disease Control and
    Prevention.
  • Its contents are solely the responsibility of the
    authors and do not necessarily represent the
    official views of the Centers for Disease Control
    and Prevention.

3
If you don't know where you are going, you might
wind up someplace else. Yogi Berra
4
What has worked well?
  • Registry linked to QI plan
  • Part of a larger process (Care Model)
  • Team approach
  • Provider champion
  • Targeted measures
  • Avoids bloat
  • Data are evaluated, and then used
  • PDSA Cycle
  • Plan for growth
  • EMR/EHR implementation
  • Linking CDEMS to EMR/EHR data

5
About Patient Registries - AHRQ
  • Understanding what a registry is and why they are
    useful is essential to success
  • Registries differ from EHRs / EMRs
  • STRENGTH in disease management / reporting
  • Available resource Registries for Evaluating
    Patient Outcomes A Users Guide
  • Published by the Agency for Healthcare Research
    and Quality (AHRQ)
  • Handbook for creating, operating and evaluating
    registries
  • In simple terms What are good registry
    practices?
  • Citation Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds.
    Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes A
    Users Guide. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center
    Outcome Sciences, Inc. dba Outcome under
    Contract No. HHSA29020050035ITO1.) AHRQ
    Publication No. 07-EHC001-1. Rockville, MD
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April
    2007.

6
Registries Then and Now
1974 E.M. Brooke, in a 1974 publication of the
World Health Organization, describes registries
for health information as a file of documents
containing uniform information about individual
persons, collected in a systematic and
comprehensive way, in order to serve a
predetermined purpose. 2007 AHRQ describes a
patient registry as an organized system that
uses observational study methods to collect
uniform data (clinical and other) to evaluate
specified outcomes for a population defined by a
particular disease, condition, or exposure, and
that serves one or more predetermined scientific,
clinical, or policy purposes.
7
Part 1 Registry Planning
  • Key Questions
  • Whats the purpose of the registry?
  • Who are the stakeholders?
  • Whats the scope and target population?
  • Is it feasible?
  • The registry team and advisors should be selected
    based on expertise and experience.
  • Plan for registry governance and oversight
  • Data access
  • Publications
  • Change management (EMR use, someday)

8
Part 2 Registry Design
  • Focus on the major purpose of the registry
  • Keep it practical, and achievable
  • Data elements
  • What data elements are absolutely necessary?
  • Which are desirable but not essential?
  • Where can the data be found?
  • Are existing data available for import into your
    registry?

9
Part 3 Registry Buy-In
  • Buy-in effects the overall quality of the data
    and whether or not the data are used
  • What are the goals?
  • What are the incentives?
  • California Clinics Receive Funding to Enhance
    Chronic Disease Care, Using Electronic Registries
  • From the California HealthCare Foundation
    http//www.rwjf.org/qualityequality/digest.jsp?id
    8002cEMC-ND142
  • Online Registry Improves Diabetes Care in Kansas
  • From HealthCare IT News http//www.nxtbook.com/nx
    tbooks/medtech/hitn0608//16
  • WV FQHC received federal funding for CDEMS use

10
Part 4 Data Collection
Quality Assurance
  • Quality data (and meeting your goals) depends on
    proper registry structure, data definitions, user
    training and problem solving
  • Points to consider
  • Data collection
  • Data cleaning
  • Data storing
  • Data monitoring / reviewing
  • Reporting

11
Contact Information
Cecil Pollard, Director (304) 293-1080
cpollard_at_hsc.wvu.edu Trisha Petitte, Assistant
Director, Health Improvement Consultant (304)
293-1084 tpetitte_at_hsc.wvu.edu Mary Swim,
Applications Programmer, Technical
Support (304) 293-1079 mswim_at_hsc.wvu.edu
Adam Baus, Program Coordinator, Sr., Technical
Support (304) 293-1083 abaus_at_hsc.wvu.edu
Nell Stuart, Health Improvement
Consultant (304) 276-3785 nstuart_at_hsc.wvu.edu
Marie Gravely, Health Improvement
Consultant (304) 482-6016 mgravely_at_hsc.wvu.ed
u
Office website wvuohsr.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com