Title: TRADEMARKS
1TRADEMARKS
2TO BE A MARK
- WORDS OR SYMBOL HAS TO SERVE AS A BRAND
- MEANING IT HAS TO DISTINGUISH ONES GOODS OR
SERVICES FROM THOSE OF OTHERS
3TO BE A MARK
- HAS TO BE USED PHYSICALLY
- ON THE GOODS, or
- ON GOODS CONTAINERS, or
- ON POINT-OF-SALE DISPLAYS OF GOODS, or
- IF THESE METHODS ARE IMPRACTICAL, ON INVOICES OR
SHIPPING DOCUMENTS, or - IN CATALOGS OR WEBSITES ADVERTISING THE GOODS
4OWNERSHIP OF SUCH A MARK REQUIRES USE IN COMMERCE
- THINKING OF THE MARK WILL NOT SUFFICE
- NO USE NO OWNERSHIP
5- FOR A SERVICE MARK, THE USE CAN BE
- ON SIGNS,
- ADS, OR
- PAPERS CONNECTED TO THE SERVICE
6TO OWN A MARK
- THE MARKED GOODS OR SERVICES HAVE TO PASS IN
COMMERCE - LOCAL, FOR STATE RIGHTS
- INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN, FOR FEDERAL RIGHTS
7- FEDERAL USE IN COMMERCE
- CAN BE ACTUAL
- CAN BE BONA FIDE INTENDED (WITH TIME LIMITS)
8PROTECTION
- RIGHTS BEGIN UPON FIRST USE ACTUAL OR
CONSTRUCTIVE BY FILING - REGISTRATION IS NOT NECESSARY
- CAN SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED MARK
- DONE UNDER UNFAIR COMPETITION PROVISION OF THE
TRADEMARK ACT
9CASE
10WHAT IS INFRINGEMENT?
- USE, IN COMMERCE, OF A MARK IN SUCH MANNER,
CONSIDERING THE GOODS OR SERVICES INVOLVED, AS TO
CREATE A LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION AMONG PURCHASERS
11CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
- AS TO SOURCE
- AS TO SPONSORSHIP
- AS TO AFFILIATION
- AS TO APPROVAL
12CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
- SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PERSONS
- PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
- DEPENDS HOW MANY SPEAK IT IN U.S.
13STRONG-WEAK MARKSFOR JUDGING LIKELIHOOD OF
CONFUSION
- 1 -- COINED (MEANINGLESS WORDS) -- e.g., KODAK
STRONGEST OF ALL - ENTITLED TO THE WIDEST SCOPE OF PROTECTION
- MODAK, DODAK, KODAR, FOR FILM WILL BE HELD
INFRINGING
14- 2 -- ARBITRARY e.g. APPLE, SUN, SHELL
-
- ALSO VERY STRONG FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND
COMPUTERS (APPLE), OR FOR OIL PRODUCTS (SUN,
SHELL) - NOTE SUN ALSO ARBITRARY FOR SOFTWARE (SUN
MICROSYSTEMS)
15- 3 -- SUGGESTIVE (e.g. MILKY WAY COPPERTONE)
OK, BUT WEAKER - CREAMY WAY, BRONZETONE MIGHT BE HELD
NONINFRINGING - 4 -- DESCRIPTIVE (e.g. TASTEE BREAD, SUPERIOR
WATERBEDS), and SURNAMES (WATERMAN FOR PENS, FORD
FOR CARS) - ARE NOT PROTECTED RIGHT AWAY
- ARE PROTECTED WHEN THEY HAVE ACQUIRED
DISTINCTIVENESS
16- NOTE DESCRIPTIVE INCLUDES GEOG. DESCRIPTIVE
(e.g. SOUTHWEST FOR AIRLINE SERVICES HOUSTON
CHRONICLE FOR NEWSPAPERS) - WERE NOT PROTECTED (OWNED) AT FIRST
17- 5 -- GENERIC NAME OF ARTICLE (e.g. ASPIRIN)
- CANNOT SERVE AS A MARK
- CANNOT ACQUIRE DISTINCTIVENESS ITS PART OF THE
LANGUAGE
18INFRINGEMENT LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
- CASES
- XTREME PART 1
- STREETWISE
- QUILL
19BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
- WHILE NOT NEEDED FOR OWNING EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
USE A MARK, OR FOR SUING INFRINGERS, THERE ARE
MANY BENEFITS TO A FEDERAL REGISTRATION - BY FILING AN APPLICATION, CAN RESERVE A MARK
BASED ON INTENDED USE - IF REGISTERED, EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE THE MARK IS
PRESUMED - INCONTESTABLE AFTER 5 YEARS
20(MORE BENEFITS OF FED. REGISTRATION)
- IN ADDITION TO OWNERSHIP, VALIDITY OF THE MARK IS
PRESUMED - e.g., NOT CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR TO MARK OF AN
EARLIER USER - U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE WILL ASSIST AGAINST
INFRINGING IMPORTATIONS
21RESERVING A MARK
- CAN NOW FILE APPL. TO REGISTER BASED ON INTENT TO
USE - PROVIDES CONSTRUCTIVE USE AS OF FILING DATE
- MUST ACTUALLY USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO
REGISTRATION
22TIME LIMITS FOR INTENT-TO-USE APPLICATIONS
- APPLICATION IS EXAMINED IN THE USUAL WAY
- IF O.K., A NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE OF REGISTRATION
WILL BE SENT - APPLICANT MUST ACTUALLY USE, AND FILE AFFIDAVIT
OF USE, WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE NOTICE - CAN BE EXTENDED BY PETITION, UP TO 24 MONTHS
23- INTENT-TO-USE IF THE FAVORED PROCEDURE FOR
CLIENTS TODAY - GIVES A CLUE ABOUT REGISTRABILITY, PRIOR TO
SPENDING MONEY ADVERTISING THE BRAND - GIVES A CHANCE FOR CHANGE-OF-MIND, WITHOUT
SERIOUS EXPENDITURE TM APPL. FILING FEE 325
ONLINE 375 IN PAPER
24MARKS THAT ARE EASY TO PROTECT
- COINED KODAK PURELL
- ARBITRARY APPLE SUN
- SUGGESTIVE MILKY WAY COPPERTONE
- THESE ARE PROTECTED UPON FIRST USE IN COMMERCE
-
25HARDER TO PROTECT
- DESCRIPTIVE TASTEE
- A SURNAME STEINWAY WATERMAN
- GEOGRAPHIC MID-ATLANTIC SOUTHWEST
- THESE WERE NOT PROTECTED UPON FIRST USE
- NEED TO DEVELOP ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS OVER
TIME, SOMETIMES CALLED SECONDARY MEANING
26WHAT IS NOT A MARK
- GENERIC NAME OF A THING
- BREAD FOR BREAD
- SOME CLOSE ISSUES
- ASPIRIN
- SHREDDED WHEAT
- Cf. KLEENEX PING-PONG XEROX
27CASE
28EXAMPLES OF MARKS
29- TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK
30- TRADEMARK (FOR CONTAINER OF SCOTCH)
31 32- SERVICE MARK (ENTERTAINMENT)
33 34- SERVICE MARK (OILFIELD FIRE-FIGHTING)
35 36- CERTIFICATION MARK FOR CLOTHING
37 38- COMPOSITE-STYLE TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK
SYMBOL AND WORD
39CASE
40NATURE OF RIGHTS IN MARKS
- PREVENT OTHERS FROM USING SIMILAR MARK WHERE
CONFUSION WOULD BE LIKELY - NOT A RIGHT TO PREVENT ALL USES
- CADILLAC FOR CARS AND DOG FOOD
- CHAMPION FOR PAPER AND BOXING GLOVES AND SPARK
PLUGS
41DURATION OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT IN A MARK
- AS LONG AS YOU ARE USING IT IN COMMERCE, PROVIDED
- - - IT DOES NOT BECOME GENERIC
- IT DOES NOT LOSE ITS CHARACTER AS SINGLE-SOURCE
INDICATOR
42REITERATING THE LEGAL BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
- PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE
- CONSTRUCTIVE USE EVERYWHERE, AS OF THE FILING
DATE - STARTS FIVE-YEAR CLOCK TO INCONTESTABILITY
43PRACTICAL BENEFIT OF REGISTRATION
- OTHERS WILL FIND OUT ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS, AND WONT
ADOPT SIMILAR MARK - CHEAP POLICING
44CASE
45FALLING INTO THE REGISTERED PIT
- PROBLEM
- 1ST USER HAS NO REGISTRATION
- 2ND USER GOT STATE AND FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS, TWO
YEARS AGO - GOODS/MARKS CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR
- WHO WINS?
46THE THORNPERMANENT LOCAL USE RIGHTS
- THE ONE BIG PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST USER IN
COMMERCE - SECOND USER CAN GET PERMANENT LOCAL RIGHTS TO USE
- IF CONFUSION, FIRST USER MUST STAY OUT!
47PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
- LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
- (1) 2ND USER IS FIRST TO USE IN A LOCALE (STATE
OR LESS) - (2) 2ND USER HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR USER
ELSEWHERE AT TIME OF 2ND USERS ADOPTION
48PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
- FOR MANY YEARS, THE CUTOFF DATE FOR ESTABLISHING
LOCAL RIGHTS WAS THE FEDERAL REGISTRATION DATE - REGISTRATION PROVIDED CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (SEE
1072), THEREBY BLOCKING CONDITION (2)
49PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
- NOW, CONGRESS HAS PROVIDED THAT A FEDERAL
REGISTRATION CONSTITUTES CONSTRUCTIVE USE
EVERYWHERE AS OF THE FILING DATE (1057(c)) - THIS KILLS CONDITION (1) AS OF THE FILING DATE
50PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
- REGISTRATION AS CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE DOESNT
MATTER ANY MORE - THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING NEW INNOCENT LOCAL
RIGHTS ENDED AT THE FILING DATE - i.e., 1ST USER IS DEEMED TO BE EVERYWHERE
51CASE
52QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
- WALK THROUGH 1052
- THESE CONDITIONS FOR REGISTRATION ARE APPLIED
BY COURTS IN DECIDING PROTECTION FOR
UNREGISTERED MARKS
53QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
- START WITH 1052 (a) - (d) TELLS US MANY PROBLEMS
ARE INCURABLE
54QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
- THE (e) GROUP SOME ARE CURABLE
- DESCRIPTIVE
- GEOGRAPHIC
- SURNAMES
- SOME NOT CURABLE DECEPTIVELY MISDESCRIPTIVE
55QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
- FUNCTIONAL (WORRY MARK PROTECTION CAN LAST
FOREVER) - EXAMPLE SHAPE OF A DESK LAMP
- CANNOT BE CURED
56GETTING FROM QUASI TO FULLSHOWING ACQUIRED
DISTINCTIVENESS
- OFTEN CALLED SECONDARY MEANING
- SHOWS THE QUASI-MARK HAS ARRIVED NOW SIGNALS
SOURCE - FIVE YEARS EXCLUSIVE USE MAY DO
- 15 USC 1052 (f)
57LESS KNOWN TYPES
- COLLECTIVE MARKS
- TRADE / SERVICE MARKS
- MEMBERSHIP MARKS
- CERTIFICATION MARKS
- 1054
58WHO HAS THE RIGHT? THE PROBLEM OF GRAY GOODS
- ARISES FROM CORPORATE SPINOFFS ABOUT AS FREQUENT
AS MERGERS - WHEN FOREIGN MARKET IS SPUN OFF, MARKS USUALLY GO
WITH - ALSO FROM LICENSING IP MAXIMIZATION
59GRAY GOODS
- U.S. RULE
- IF OWNERS ARE SAME OR RELATED, NO RELIEF AGAINST
IMPORTATION - IF OWNERS ARE UNRELATED, RELIEF IF QUALITY IS
LOWER
60WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
- FAIR USE TO DESCRIBE
- JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL
- WE RENT ALL TYPES, INCLUDING COMPAQ, IBM, AND
DELL - 1115 (4)
JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL WE RENT ALL
TYPES INCLUDING COMPAQ AND IBM
61WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
- OWN NAME IN BUSINESS OTHER THAN AS A MARK
- Cf SPERAS RESTAURANT
- TONY SPERA, PROP.
- TONYS RESTAURANT
- TONY SPERA, PROP.
62N.B.
- NO GENERAL RIGHT TO USE YOUR OWN NAME IN BUSINESS
- MOST ATTEMPTS FAIL
- NO POINT IN CHANGING YOUR NAME TO JOHNNY WALKER
IF YOU ARE GOING TO SELL WHISKY
63N.B.
- STATEMENTS OF DISCONNECTEDNESS USUALLY FAIL
64CASE
- AMBASSADOR EAST v. ORSATTI
65A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
- WHEN THERE IS NO INFRINGEMENT BECAUSE NO
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION - BUT THE ACTS OF D SOMEHOW CHEAPEN OR TARNISH OR
REDUCE THE VALUE OF PS MARK
66A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
- EXAMPLE
- CADILLAC FOR CARS
- FOLLOWED MANY YEARS LATER BY CADILLAC FOR DOG
FOOD
67A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
- ONLY AVAILABLE FOR FAMOUS MARKS
- NO DAMAGES NORMALLY
- INJUNCTIVE ONLY
- 1125 (c)
68REMEDIES
69INJUNCTIVE
- NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WITHOUT EXCLUSION POWER
- CONSIDER LAND OR CAR ANALOGY IF ONLY DAMAGES,
YOU ARE MERELY IN THE RENTAL BUSINESS
70INJUNCTIVE
- PRELIMINARY
- PERMANENT
- 1116 (a)
- 4,000 TRADEMARK SUITS FILED ANNUALLY
- ABOUT 45 GO TO TRIAL
71MONETARY
- DS PROFITS
- OR PS DAMAGES DIFFICULT TO SHOW
- COURT CAN TREBLE PS DAMAGES
- IF DS PROFITS AS REMEDY IS TOO SMALL/LARGE,
COURT CAN ENTER A JUST AMOUNT - 1117 (a)
72ATTORNEYS FEES
- EXCEPTIONAL CASES ONLY
- USUALLY MEANS WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
- 1117 (a)
73DESTRUCTION
- A NICE MEDIEVAL REMEDY
- ALL INFRINGING LABELS, AND THE MEANS OF MAKING
THEM PRINTING GEAR, INCL. COMPUTERS? - 1118
74DEFENDANTS REMEDIES
- ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCEPTIONAL CASES
- 1117 (a)
- ORDER TO CANCEL REGISTRATION
- 1119
75- CASES
- KELLOGG
- XTREME PART 2