TRADEMARKS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TRADEMARKS

Description:

Title: INTELL. PROP. SURVEY: TRADEMARK SECTION Author: PJanicke Last modified by: P Janicke Created Date: 7/30/2000 5:29:30 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:180
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: PJanicke
Learn more at: https://www.law.uh.edu
Category:
Tags: trademarks

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRADEMARKS


1
TRADEMARKS
  • PROF. JANICKE
  • FALL 2014

2
TO BE A MARK
  • WORDS OR SYMBOL HAS TO SERVE AS A BRAND
  • MEANING IT HAS TO DISTINGUISH ONES GOODS OR
    SERVICES FROM THOSE OF OTHERS

3
TO BE A MARK
  • HAS TO BE USED PHYSICALLY
  • ON THE GOODS, or
  • ON GOODS CONTAINERS, or
  • ON POINT-OF-SALE DISPLAYS OF GOODS, or
  • IF THESE METHODS ARE IMPRACTICAL, ON INVOICES OR
    SHIPPING DOCUMENTS, or
  • IN CATALOGS OR WEBSITES ADVERTISING THE GOODS

4
OWNERSHIP OF SUCH A MARK REQUIRES USE IN COMMERCE
  • THINKING OF THE MARK WILL NOT SUFFICE
  • NO USE NO OWNERSHIP

5
  • FOR A SERVICE MARK, THE USE CAN BE
  • ON SIGNS,
  • ADS, OR
  • PAPERS CONNECTED TO THE SERVICE

6
TO OWN A MARK
  • THE MARKED GOODS OR SERVICES HAVE TO PASS IN
    COMMERCE
  • LOCAL, FOR STATE RIGHTS
  • INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN, FOR FEDERAL RIGHTS

7
  • FEDERAL USE IN COMMERCE
  • CAN BE ACTUAL
  • CAN BE BONA FIDE INTENDED (WITH TIME LIMITS)

8
PROTECTION
  • RIGHTS BEGIN UPON FIRST USE ACTUAL OR
    CONSTRUCTIVE BY FILING
  • REGISTRATION IS NOT NECESSARY
  • CAN SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED MARK
  • DONE UNDER UNFAIR COMPETITION PROVISION OF THE
    TRADEMARK ACT

9
CASE
  • BLUE BELL v. FARAH

10
WHAT IS INFRINGEMENT?
  • USE, IN COMMERCE, OF A MARK IN SUCH MANNER,
    CONSIDERING THE GOODS OR SERVICES INVOLVED, AS TO
    CREATE A LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION AMONG PURCHASERS

11
CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
  • AS TO SOURCE
  • AS TO SPONSORSHIP
  • AS TO AFFILIATION
  • AS TO APPROVAL

12
CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
  • SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PERSONS
  • PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
  • DEPENDS HOW MANY SPEAK IT IN U.S.

13
STRONG-WEAK MARKSFOR JUDGING LIKELIHOOD OF
CONFUSION
  • 1 -- COINED (MEANINGLESS WORDS) -- e.g., KODAK
    STRONGEST OF ALL
  • ENTITLED TO THE WIDEST SCOPE OF PROTECTION
  • MODAK, DODAK, KODAR, FOR FILM WILL BE HELD
    INFRINGING

14
  • 2 -- ARBITRARY e.g. APPLE, SUN, SHELL
  • ALSO VERY STRONG FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND
    COMPUTERS (APPLE), OR FOR OIL PRODUCTS (SUN,
    SHELL)
  • NOTE SUN ALSO ARBITRARY FOR SOFTWARE (SUN
    MICROSYSTEMS)

15
  • 3 -- SUGGESTIVE (e.g. MILKY WAY COPPERTONE)
    OK, BUT WEAKER
  • CREAMY WAY, BRONZETONE MIGHT BE HELD
    NONINFRINGING
  • 4 -- DESCRIPTIVE (e.g. TASTEE BREAD, SUPERIOR
    WATERBEDS), and SURNAMES (WATERMAN FOR PENS, FORD
    FOR CARS)
  • ARE NOT PROTECTED RIGHT AWAY
  • ARE PROTECTED WHEN THEY HAVE ACQUIRED
    DISTINCTIVENESS

16
  • NOTE DESCRIPTIVE INCLUDES GEOG. DESCRIPTIVE
    (e.g. SOUTHWEST FOR AIRLINE SERVICES HOUSTON
    CHRONICLE FOR NEWSPAPERS)
  • WERE NOT PROTECTED (OWNED) AT FIRST

17
  • 5 -- GENERIC NAME OF ARTICLE (e.g. ASPIRIN)
  • CANNOT SERVE AS A MARK
  • CANNOT ACQUIRE DISTINCTIVENESS ITS PART OF THE
    LANGUAGE

18
INFRINGEMENT LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
  • CASES
  • XTREME PART 1
  • STREETWISE
  • QUILL

19
BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
  • WHILE NOT NEEDED FOR OWNING EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
    USE A MARK, OR FOR SUING INFRINGERS, THERE ARE
    MANY BENEFITS TO A FEDERAL REGISTRATION
  • BY FILING AN APPLICATION, CAN RESERVE A MARK
    BASED ON INTENDED USE
  • IF REGISTERED, EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE THE MARK IS
    PRESUMED
  • INCONTESTABLE AFTER 5 YEARS

20
(MORE BENEFITS OF FED. REGISTRATION)
  • IN ADDITION TO OWNERSHIP, VALIDITY OF THE MARK IS
    PRESUMED
  • e.g., NOT CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR TO MARK OF AN
    EARLIER USER
  • U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE WILL ASSIST AGAINST
    INFRINGING IMPORTATIONS

21
RESERVING A MARK
  • CAN NOW FILE APPL. TO REGISTER BASED ON INTENT TO
    USE
  • PROVIDES CONSTRUCTIVE USE AS OF FILING DATE
  • MUST ACTUALLY USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO
    REGISTRATION

22
TIME LIMITS FOR INTENT-TO-USE APPLICATIONS
  • APPLICATION IS EXAMINED IN THE USUAL WAY
  • IF O.K., A NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE OF REGISTRATION
    WILL BE SENT
  • APPLICANT MUST ACTUALLY USE, AND FILE AFFIDAVIT
    OF USE, WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE NOTICE
  • CAN BE EXTENDED BY PETITION, UP TO 24 MONTHS

23
  • INTENT-TO-USE IF THE FAVORED PROCEDURE FOR
    CLIENTS TODAY
  • GIVES A CLUE ABOUT REGISTRABILITY, PRIOR TO
    SPENDING MONEY ADVERTISING THE BRAND
  • GIVES A CHANCE FOR CHANGE-OF-MIND, WITHOUT
    SERIOUS EXPENDITURE TM APPL. FILING FEE 325
    ONLINE 375 IN PAPER

24
MARKS THAT ARE EASY TO PROTECT
  • COINED KODAK PURELL
  • ARBITRARY APPLE SUN
  • SUGGESTIVE MILKY WAY COPPERTONE
  • THESE ARE PROTECTED UPON FIRST USE IN COMMERCE

25
HARDER TO PROTECT
  • DESCRIPTIVE TASTEE
  • A SURNAME STEINWAY WATERMAN
  • GEOGRAPHIC MID-ATLANTIC SOUTHWEST
  • THESE WERE NOT PROTECTED UPON FIRST USE
  • NEED TO DEVELOP ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS OVER
    TIME, SOMETIMES CALLED SECONDARY MEANING

26
WHAT IS NOT A MARK
  • GENERIC NAME OF A THING
  • BREAD FOR BREAD
  • SOME CLOSE ISSUES
  • ASPIRIN
  • SHREDDED WHEAT
  • Cf. KLEENEX PING-PONG XEROX

27
CASE
  • PARK N FLY

28
EXAMPLES OF MARKS
29
  • TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK

30
  • TRADEMARK (FOR CONTAINER OF SCOTCH)

31
  • SERVICE MARK (INSURANCE)

32
  • SERVICE MARK (ENTERTAINMENT)

33
  • COLLECTIVE MARK (ALUMNI)

34
  • SERVICE MARK (OILFIELD FIRE-FIGHTING)

35
  • COLLECTIVE MARK

36
  • CERTIFICATION MARK FOR CLOTHING

37
  • TRADEMARK FOR CLOTHING

38
  • COMPOSITE-STYLE TRADEMARK AND SERVICE MARK
    SYMBOL AND WORD

39
CASE
  • QUALITEX

40
NATURE OF RIGHTS IN MARKS
  • PREVENT OTHERS FROM USING SIMILAR MARK WHERE
    CONFUSION WOULD BE LIKELY
  • NOT A RIGHT TO PREVENT ALL USES
  • CADILLAC FOR CARS AND DOG FOOD
  • CHAMPION FOR PAPER AND BOXING GLOVES AND SPARK
    PLUGS

41
DURATION OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT IN A MARK
  • AS LONG AS YOU ARE USING IT IN COMMERCE, PROVIDED
    - -
  • IT DOES NOT BECOME GENERIC
  • IT DOES NOT LOSE ITS CHARACTER AS SINGLE-SOURCE
    INDICATOR

42
REITERATING THE LEGAL BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
  • PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE
  • CONSTRUCTIVE USE EVERYWHERE, AS OF THE FILING
    DATE
  • STARTS FIVE-YEAR CLOCK TO INCONTESTABILITY

43
PRACTICAL BENEFIT OF REGISTRATION
  • OTHERS WILL FIND OUT ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS, AND WONT
    ADOPT SIMILAR MARK
  • CHEAP POLICING

44
CASE
  • SLOPPY JOES

45
FALLING INTO THE REGISTERED PIT
  • PROBLEM
  • 1ST USER HAS NO REGISTRATION
  • 2ND USER GOT STATE AND FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS, TWO
    YEARS AGO
  • GOODS/MARKS CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR
  • WHO WINS?

46
THE THORNPERMANENT LOCAL USE RIGHTS
  • THE ONE BIG PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST USER IN
    COMMERCE
  • SECOND USER CAN GET PERMANENT LOCAL RIGHTS TO USE
  • IF CONFUSION, FIRST USER MUST STAY OUT!

47
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
  • (1) 2ND USER IS FIRST TO USE IN A LOCALE (STATE
    OR LESS)
  • (2) 2ND USER HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR USER
    ELSEWHERE AT TIME OF 2ND USERS ADOPTION

48
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • FOR MANY YEARS, THE CUTOFF DATE FOR ESTABLISHING
    LOCAL RIGHTS WAS THE FEDERAL REGISTRATION DATE
  • REGISTRATION PROVIDED CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (SEE
    1072), THEREBY BLOCKING CONDITION (2)

49
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • NOW, CONGRESS HAS PROVIDED THAT A FEDERAL
    REGISTRATION CONSTITUTES CONSTRUCTIVE USE
    EVERYWHERE AS OF THE FILING DATE (1057(c))
  • THIS KILLS CONDITION (1) AS OF THE FILING DATE

50
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • REGISTRATION AS CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE DOESNT
    MATTER ANY MORE
  • THE POSSIBILITY OF CREATING NEW INNOCENT LOCAL
    RIGHTS ENDED AT THE FILING DATE
  • i.e., 1ST USER IS DEEMED TO BE EVERYWHERE

51
CASE
  • MISTER DONUT

52
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • WALK THROUGH 1052
  • THESE CONDITIONS FOR REGISTRATION ARE APPLIED
    BY COURTS IN DECIDING PROTECTION FOR
    UNREGISTERED MARKS

53
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • START WITH 1052 (a) - (d) TELLS US MANY PROBLEMS
    ARE INCURABLE

54
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • THE (e) GROUP SOME ARE CURABLE
  • DESCRIPTIVE
  • GEOGRAPHIC
  • SURNAMES
  • SOME NOT CURABLE DECEPTIVELY MISDESCRIPTIVE

55
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • FUNCTIONAL (WORRY MARK PROTECTION CAN LAST
    FOREVER)
  • EXAMPLE SHAPE OF A DESK LAMP
  • CANNOT BE CURED

56
GETTING FROM QUASI TO FULLSHOWING ACQUIRED
DISTINCTIVENESS
  • OFTEN CALLED SECONDARY MEANING
  • SHOWS THE QUASI-MARK HAS ARRIVED NOW SIGNALS
    SOURCE
  • FIVE YEARS EXCLUSIVE USE MAY DO
  • 15 USC 1052 (f)

57
LESS KNOWN TYPES
  • COLLECTIVE MARKS
  • TRADE / SERVICE MARKS
  • MEMBERSHIP MARKS
  • CERTIFICATION MARKS
  • 1054

58
WHO HAS THE RIGHT? THE PROBLEM OF GRAY GOODS
  • ARISES FROM CORPORATE SPINOFFS ABOUT AS FREQUENT
    AS MERGERS
  • WHEN FOREIGN MARKET IS SPUN OFF, MARKS USUALLY GO
    WITH
  • ALSO FROM LICENSING IP MAXIMIZATION

59
GRAY GOODS
  • U.S. RULE
  • IF OWNERS ARE SAME OR RELATED, NO RELIEF AGAINST
    IMPORTATION
  • IF OWNERS ARE UNRELATED, RELIEF IF QUALITY IS
    LOWER

60
WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
  • FAIR USE TO DESCRIBE
  • JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL
  • WE RENT ALL TYPES, INCLUDING COMPAQ, IBM, AND
    DELL
  • 1115 (4)

JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL WE RENT ALL
TYPES INCLUDING COMPAQ AND IBM
61
WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
  • OWN NAME IN BUSINESS OTHER THAN AS A MARK
  • Cf SPERAS RESTAURANT
  • TONY SPERA, PROP.
  • TONYS RESTAURANT
  • TONY SPERA, PROP.

62
N.B.
  • NO GENERAL RIGHT TO USE YOUR OWN NAME IN BUSINESS
  • MOST ATTEMPTS FAIL
  • NO POINT IN CHANGING YOUR NAME TO JOHNNY WALKER
    IF YOU ARE GOING TO SELL WHISKY

63
N.B.
  • STATEMENTS OF DISCONNECTEDNESS USUALLY FAIL

64
CASE
  • AMBASSADOR EAST v. ORSATTI

65
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • WHEN THERE IS NO INFRINGEMENT BECAUSE NO
    LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
  • BUT THE ACTS OF D SOMEHOW CHEAPEN OR TARNISH OR
    REDUCE THE VALUE OF PS MARK

66
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • EXAMPLE
  • CADILLAC FOR CARS
  • FOLLOWED MANY YEARS LATER BY CADILLAC FOR DOG
    FOOD

67
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • ONLY AVAILABLE FOR FAMOUS MARKS
  • NO DAMAGES NORMALLY
  • INJUNCTIVE ONLY
  • 1125 (c)

68
REMEDIES
69
INJUNCTIVE
  • NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WITHOUT EXCLUSION POWER
  • CONSIDER LAND OR CAR ANALOGY IF ONLY DAMAGES,
    YOU ARE MERELY IN THE RENTAL BUSINESS

70
INJUNCTIVE
  • PRELIMINARY
  • PERMANENT
  • 1116 (a)
  • 4,000 TRADEMARK SUITS FILED ANNUALLY
  • ABOUT 45 GO TO TRIAL

71
MONETARY
  • DS PROFITS
  • OR PS DAMAGES DIFFICULT TO SHOW
  • COURT CAN TREBLE PS DAMAGES
  • IF DS PROFITS AS REMEDY IS TOO SMALL/LARGE,
    COURT CAN ENTER A JUST AMOUNT
  • 1117 (a)

72
ATTORNEYS FEES
  • EXCEPTIONAL CASES ONLY
  • USUALLY MEANS WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
  • 1117 (a)

73
DESTRUCTION
  • A NICE MEDIEVAL REMEDY
  • ALL INFRINGING LABELS, AND THE MEANS OF MAKING
    THEM PRINTING GEAR, INCL. COMPUTERS?
  • 1118

74
DEFENDANTS REMEDIES
  • ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCEPTIONAL CASES
  • 1117 (a)
  • ORDER TO CANCEL REGISTRATION
  • 1119

75
  • CASES
  • KELLOGG
  • XTREME PART 2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com