Analyzing Arguments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analyzing Arguments

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Last modified by: Thom Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: sjs52
Learn more at: https://www.sjsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analyzing Arguments


1
Lecture 9
  • Analyzing Arguments
  • Diagramming Short Arguments

2
  • This is a bit of historical documentation of what
    Spring Breaks were like when I was an
    undergraduate (well, really when I was still in
    high school) .
  • Welcome Back from Spring Break

3
Today Analyzing ArgumentsBut first, a fallacy
in the news
  • Can you spot it? What kind of fallacy is this?
  • What Obama said re. Trayvon Martin
  • What Gingrich said Obama said re. Trayvon Martin

4
Arguments Review
  • Arguments consist of premises and conclusions.
  • Premises and conclusions are statements.

5
Arguments Review
  • Premise indicator words since, because, for,
    given that, seeing that, considering that,
    inasmuch as, as, in view of the fact that, as
    indicated by, judging from, on account of
  • Conclusion indicator words therefore, thus,
    hence, consequently, so, accordingly, it follows
    that, for this reason, that is why, which shows
    that, wherefore, this implies that, as a result,
    this suggests that, this being so, we may infer
    that.

6
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Argument
  • The death penalty should be abolished because
    its racially discriminatory, theres no evidence
    that its a more effective deterrent than life
    imprisonment, and innocent people may be executed
    by mistake.

7
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Step 1 Identify (circle, underline, etc.) all
    premise and / or conclusion indicators.
  • The death penalty should be abolished because
    its racially discriminatory, theres no evidence
    that its a more effective deterrent than life
    imprisonment, and innocent people may be executed
    by mistake.

8
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Step 2 Number the statements consecutively as
    they appear in the argument.
  • The death penalty should be abolished
  • because its racially discriminatory,
  • theres no evidence that its a more effective
    deterrent than life imprisonment, and
  • innocent people may be executed by mistake.

9
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Step 3 Arrange the numbers on a page with the
    premises placed above the conclusion(s) they
    claim to support.
  • 2) 3) 4)
  • 1)

10
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Step 4 Omit any logically irrelevant
    statements.
  • Step 5 Use arrows to mean is offered as
    evidence for to show relationship of argument
    support.
  • 2) 3) 4)
  • 1)
  • Here 2), 3), and 4) offer independent support for
    the conclusion.

11
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • A premise provides independent support for a
    conclusion when the amount of support it provides
    would not be weakened or destroyed by the removal
    of any other premise in the argument.
  • A premise provides linked support when it works
    conjointly with another premise to support the
    conclusion
  • EXAMPLE No member of the SJSU community is a
    fan of the Leland Stanford Junior University
    Marching Band. Maurice is a member of the SJSU
    community. So, Maurice is not a fan of the Leland
    Stanford Junior University Marching Band.

12
Diagramming Short Arguments Linked Support
  1. No members of the SJSU community is a fan of the
    Leland Stanford Junior University Marching Band.
  2. Maurice is a member of SJSU community.
  3. So, Maurice is not a fan of the Leland Stanford
    Junior University Marching Band.

13
Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Linked Support
  • 1) 2)
  • 3)

14
Linked or Independent Support?
  • Linked Omission of one premise cancels / reduces
    support provided by the other.
  • Example
  • No student in Ling 21 is a Rhodes Scholar.
  • Josue is a Rhodes Scholar.
  • So, Josue is not a student in Ling 21.
  • Independent Neither premise would provide less
    support for the conclusion if the other were
    omitted.
  • Example
  • Nick doesnt own a car. Nick is legally blind.
  • So Nick probably wont drive a car to the game.

15
Linked or Independent Support?
  • Ten witnesses say they saw Blotto rob the bank.
    The stolen bank money was found in Blottos car.
    Blottos fingerprints were found at the Tellers
    window. Therefore, Blotto probably robbed the
    bank.
  • If Amy runs marathons, then shes probably very
    fit. Amy does run marathons. So Amy probably is
    very fit.

16
Other Kinds of Support
  • Jim is a senior citizen.
  • So, Jim probably doesnt like hip-hop music.
  • So, Jim probably wont be going to the Ashanti
    concert tonight.
  • 1)
  • 2)
  • 3)

17
Other Kinds of Support
  • Example
  • Most Democrats are liberals, and Senator
    Dumdiddle is a Democrat. Thus, Senator Dumdidle
    is probably a liberal. Therefore, Senator
    Dumdiddle probably supports affirmative action in
    higher education, because most liberals support
    affirmative action in higher education.

18
Other Kinds of Support
  • Example
  • Most Democrats are liberals, and
  • Senator Dumdiddle is a Democrat.
  • Thus, Senator Dumdidle is probably a liberal.
  • Therefore, Senator Dumdiddle probably supports
    affirmative action in higher education,
  • because most liberals support affirmative action
    in higher education.

19
Other Kinds of Support
  • Premises and conclusions
  • 1) 2)
  • 3) 5)
  • 4)

20
Other Kinds of Support
  • Cheating is wrong for several reasons. First, it
    will lower your self-respect, because you can
    never be proud of anything you got by cheating.
    Second, cheating is a lie because it deceives
    other people into thinking you know more than you
    do. Third, cheating violates the teachers trust
    that you will do your own work. Fourth, cheating
    is unfair to all the people who arent cheating.
    Finally, if you cheat in school now, youll find
    it easier to cheat in other situations later in
    life perhaps even in your closest personal
    relationships.

21
Other Kinds of Support
  • 1) Cheating is wrong for several reasons.
  • 2) First, it will lower your self-respect,
  • 3) because you can never be proud of anything you
    got by cheating.
  • 4) Second, cheating is a lie
  • 5) because it deceives other people into thinking
    you know more than you do.
  • 6) Third, cheating violates the teachers trust
    that you will do your own work.
  • 7) Fourth, cheating is unfair to all the people
    who arent cheating.
  • 8) Finally, if you cheat in school now, youll
    find it easier to cheat in other situations later
    in life perhaps even in your closest personal
    relationships.

22
Other Kinds of Support
  • Notice the use of because in 3) and 5)
  • 3) 5)
  • 2) 4)

23
Other Kinds of Support
  • Note that 2), 4), 6), 7), and 8) all provide
    independent support for the main conclusion 1)
  • 3) 5)
  • 2) 4) 6) 7) 8)
  • 1)

24
Tips on Diagramming Short Arguments
  • Find the main conclusion first
  • Pay close attention to premise and conclusion
    indicators.
  • Remember sentences containing the word and
    often contain two or more separate statements.
  • Treat conditional statements (if-then) and
    disjunctive statements (either-or) as single
    statements.
  • Dont number / diagram any sentence that is not a
    statement.
  • Dont diagram irrelevant statements.
  • Dont diagram redundant statements.

25
Practice
  • Critical Thinking, p. 171-75, Exercise 7.1
  • Step 1 Identify (circle, underline, etc.) all
    premise and / or conclusion indicators.
  • Step 2 Number the statements consecutively as
    they appear in the argument.
  • Step 3 Arrange the numbers on a page with the
    premises placed above the conclusion(s) they
    claim to support.
  • Step 4 Omit any logically irrelevant
    statements.
  • Step 5 Use arrows to mean is offered as
    evidence for to show relationship of argument
    support.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com