Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers

Description:

Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers Survey of Academic Scientists and Engineers Dr Suzanne King People Science & Policy Ltd – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Suzanne160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers


1
Factors Affecting Science Communication by
Scientists and Engineers
  • Survey of Academic
  • Scientists and Engineers

Dr Suzanne King People Science Policy Ltd
2
The Survey
  • The Royal Society
  • The Research Councils
  • The Wellcome Trust

3
The Survey
  • Web-based survey of 1485 research scientists and
    engineers in UK HEIs
  • Additional samples of
  • RC unit staff
  • Wellcome Trust fellows
  • Royal Society fellows
  • 41 follow-up in-depth telephone interviews
  • Interviews with national stakeholder organisations

4
What did public engagement mean?
  • Promote public understanding of science (34)
  • Highlight implications, relevance and value of
    science (15)
  • Listening and understanding the public (13)

5
What was the purpose of public engagement?
  • Better informed public (35)
  • Least important reasons
  • Contribute to ethical discussions (5)
  • Recruit students (4)

6
What had they done in the past year?
  • 74 had taken part in at least one science
    communication activity

7
Who was the audience?
  • Policy-makers (60)
  • Schools and teachers (50)
  • Industry (47)
  • NGOs (34)
  • Media (33)

8
How active had they been in the last year?
  • 11 very active (more than 10 activities)
  • 63 active (1-10 activities)
  • 26 inactive (no activities)
  • 47 wanted to spend more time on public
    engagement
  • When asked an open question why - 66 said
    because scientists should engage with the
    community
  • 3 wanted to do less public engagement

9
Who did public engagement?
  • Those with communication training
  • Senior researchers
  • Those over 40
  • Government and charity funded researchers
  • Clinical and non-bioscience researchers
  • Those in departments rated 1-5 in the RAE
  • Those in research only positions

10
What would encourage you to get (more) involved?
11
The need for an infrastructure
  • 21 if someone else initiated it they would get
    involved
  • 39 very/fairly difficult to get involved

12
The need for culture change
  • Time away from research (70)
  • Career depends on RAE and bringing in money to
    department
  • Scientists who do PE less well regarded by peers
    (20 agreed but 54 disagreed)
  • Reinforced negative stereotypes of women
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com