Title: Forest Certification
1Forest Certification Communitiesin the U.S.
- For ENVS 295 FOR/NR 285 Community-based
Forestry - Cecilia Danks, Ph.D.
- Assistant Professor, Environmental Policy
- The Rubenstein School
- of Environment and Natural Resources
- University of Vermont
2Roles for Communitiesin certification process
- As a Certificate holder
- As a Stakeholder
- Varies by System!
- Varies by Type of Operation!
3Certification Systems in the US
- Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
- Since 1993, 26 million acres in US
- Globally 113 million acres
- 10 Principles 56 Criteria
- 3 chamber governance with strong environmental
support - Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI)
- Since 1994, 3rd party 38 million acres in US
- US Canada 93 million acres
- 6 Principles, 11 Objectives
- Initiated by industry (American Forest Paper
Assn) now separate SF Board
4Other forestry standards systems
- Other International
- E.g. PEFC European CSA- Canadian
- ISO 14001 for Environmental Management Systems
- American Tree Farm System
- Since 1941, 26 million acres in US
- Recognized by SFI as a wood source
- Independent standards labels
- Often 1st party
- Often localized, e.g. Vermont Family Forest
5- So a number of systems, a few major ones.
- But, not as systematic as one might hope.
Will focus on FSC SFI in US
6Types of Operations Certified
- Forest Management Operations (the land!)
- Private, for-profit
- Corporate, Large Small Private landowners
- Public
- Local, State, Federal (not Forest Service/BLM)
- Other
- E.g. University, Tribal, Communal, Non profits
professional Resource Managers - Chain-of-custody operations (sawmills,
manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers)
7Chain of Authority and Information in Forest
Certification
8How FSC SFI Address Socioeconomic Issues
- Standards
- Forest Management Operations
- CoC / Procurement
- Monitoring Required
- Assessment
- Public Information
9How FSC SFI Address Socioeconomic Issues
- One key difference between FSC and SFI is the
extent to which social and economic issues are
emphasized. - --- Yale U. Program on Forest Certification 2002
- Due in large part to Governance
- Mission
- Geographic scope
10- FSC examines
- Social impacts, esp. relationships and rights
- Economic viability
- SFI assumes
- fundamental premise that social issues
addressed by US laws regulations - Market is most appropriate mechanism to address
economic viability
11FSC Socioeconomic Standards
- About half of Ps are social standards
- Principles 1-4, much of 5 and some of 7-10
- P 1 Legal compliance
- P 2 Tenure Rights of owners, community
- P 3 Indigenous Peoples Rights
- P 4 Community Relations and Workers Rights
- P 5 Benefits, incl. local processing
reinvestment - P 7 Management Plan, incl. describe SE
conditions - P 8 Monitoring, incl SE impacts
12FSC Principle 4 Community Workers
- P.4 FMOs shall maintain or enhance the
long-term social well-being of forest workers and
local communities. - 4.1 Employment training for local communities
- Indicators
- Compensation meets or exceeds local norms
- Procure goods and services locally
- Give preference to qualified local workers
- Participate in civic activities education
- Provide training opportunities to workers
13More of P. 4 Criteria
- 4.4 Management planning and operations shall
incorporate the results of evaluations of social
impact. - Consultations shall be maintained with people
and groups directly affected - 4.5 Employ mechanism for resolving grievances
14FSC SE Monitoring requirements
- Principle 8 Monitoring and Assessment
- Monitoring shall be conducted -- appropriate to
- the scale and intensity of forest management
to - assess the condition of the forest, yields of
forest - products, chain of custody, management
activities - and their social and environmental impacts.
15- Applicability Note for Principle 8
- On small and medium sized forests, an informal,
qualitative assessment could be appropriate. On
large forests and intensively managed forests,
formal, quantitative monitoring is probably
required. - my italics
16Principle 8 Monitoring
- US Indicators 2.5 pages specifying biophysical
management data - SE Data to be collected
- 8.2.d. Environmental and social impacts of
harvesting and other operations. - 8.2.d.3. Employment generation, creation or
maintenance of local jobs, and public responses
to management activities are monitored. - 8.2.e. Cost, productivity, and efficiency of
forest management.
17FSC Chain of Custody
Allows CoC to sell FSC products with FSC label
- Certifies ability to keep sources separate,
analyzes risk of contamination, little about
conditions of production - Informally, egregious issues, e.g. child or slave
labor
18SFI Socioeconomic Standards
- For land ownerships
- 4.1.1.1.3 Provide recreation and educational
opportunities - Core 1. A written policy describing public
recreation and education efforts, consistent with
forest management objectives - Other expertise on staff, make presentations
to local groups, develop recreational areas,
19SFI Manufacturing Participants
- Allows companies to advertise themselves as a
Participant and use SFI label on all products,
regardless of certified SFI content. - Certifies procurement system, not conditions of
production
This does not imply that any or all of the
material originates from SFI-certified forests.
20SFI Socioeconomic Standards
- For Manufacturing /Procurement Participants
- 4.2.1.1.2 Foster professionalism of wood
producers - Core 1 Written policy promoting professional
training of wood producers - Core 2 Support of SFI Implementation Committees
which offer wood producer training courses in - e. logging safety
- f. OSHA wage and hour rules
- Changing 2005 standards may be quite different
21Draft SFI 2005 standards
- Principles for Sustainable Forestry
-
- Managed forests make a vital contribution to
the world by providing economic, consumer,
environmental and aesthetic social benefits
indispensable to quality of life.
--------------
------------------
22Socioeconomic Issues in Assessment
- FSC
- Typically 3 team members forester, ecologist,
and often a social scientist - Mandatory stakeholder consultation
- -- Smartwood Assessor Training
- SFI
- At a minimumexpertise in wildlife ecology,
silviculture, forest hydrology and operations - -- 2002-2004 SFI Verification / Certification
Principles and Procedures
23SE issues that FSC assessors look at
- Through self-reporting stakeholder
consultation - Relationships
- with employees
- with neighbors
- with community --A good corporate citizen
- Dispute Resolution Process
- Contribution to local economy
- Economic viability of operation
24SE Issues that SFI verifiers look at
- Ask for documented policies about
- Public access for recreation
- Support of training programs for workers
- Compliance with labor laws
- Good corporate citizen
- Volunteer efforts, donations, scholarships
- Access for education and research
- Addressing impacts of operations on neighbors
25What data are made public?Public Summaries
- FSC
- Specifies much of content varies by certifier
- About 18-36 page documents
- Made public by certifier (on website)
- SFI
- Content varies considerable company discretion
- Made public by company
- To date no central or easy access
26SE info in FSC Public Summaries
- Includes
- In general description include brief section
Environmental and Socioeconomic Conditions - Strengths and Weaknesses by FSC Principle
- Stakeholders
- Varies by date, certifier and case
27SE info in FSC Public Summaries
- Weakness
- XXX does not conduct any formal social impact
assessments or social impact monitoring, e.g.
changes in the of jobs from changes in forest
management activities. - Strength
- Although there is not formal social impact
monitoring, XXX gains valuable feedback ,
informally through their involvement in the
community.
28SE info in FSC Public Summaries
- In Description or Findings
- XXX is a major employer in the area.
- XXXs employees play an important role in the
economic health and social fabric of the region. - XXXs mill employs approximately 200 people from
the area.
29SE info in Public Summaries General statements,
little data
- XXX purchases a majority of goods, equipment and
services from local businesses. - XXX is improving salaries to be commensurate
with local standards. - Employee compensation meet or exceed
prevailing local norms.
30Chain of Authority and Information in Forest
Certification
31- Research social requirements of FSC
certification have positive social benefits - Stakeholder consultations
- Concern for relationships, esp. with community
- See Molnar et al for others
32Thanks!Questions?