Title: Assessing%20Risks/Challenges%20in%20Energy%20Cooperation
1Assessing Risks/Challenges in Energy Cooperation
- Christopher Findlay
- Asia Pacific School of Economics Management
- The Australian National University
Presented to the Korea Energy Economics
Institute, 18 October, 2002, Seoul, Korea
2Main Propositions
- The efficiency of local production and
consumption is central to achieving stable and
secure energy supply. - Domestic deregulation of energy related
infrastructure is central to energy security by
enabling pro-market structural adjustment. - Regional cooperation needs to be contestable to
achieve global best practice in energy through
the contribution of foreign capital, innovation
and entrepreneurship.
A more detailed discussion of the issues in this
presentation are set out in a Background Paper.
3The Evolution of the Energy Security Risk Focus
in Northeast Asia
Economic Security
Develop geographic proximate resources. Emphasise
regional cooperation. Pro-market regulatory
regime in home markets. Promote foreign capital,
technology entrepreneurship. Mitigate
environmental risk potential Kyoto Protocol
sanctions.
Cost of Energy
Impact on Economic Efficiency
Price Stability Efficient fuel type adaptability
Geo-political Risk
Freedom of Navigation Security of Physical Supply
1970s
1990s
2000s
Time
main focus
risk management outcome
4Key Messages on the Evolution of Energy Security
Risk
- Economies gain from measures that assist with the
efficient absorption of world price instability. - This can be achieved through a thoughtful and
carefully designed pro-competitive regulatory
regime. - that will achieve allocative efficiency in the
short term (ie decision making based on prices
which reflect costs at the margin) and will
support the necessary investment to underpin new
competition and technology across the energy
supply chain. - These are critical elements of an enduring
solution to the lack of energy security.
5Challenges for cooperation
- Infrastructure policy
- small group cooperation and preferences
- environmental parameters
- government agreements
6Infrastructure policy
- Domestic
- debate on price now vs investment later
- investment in critical
- Cross border
- same challenges arise in a more difficult setting
- cooperation at government level required
- value of looking at some models
- including within countries, eg Australia
7Small group arrangements
- Preferential structures
- risk of locking-in inefficient solutions
- imposing costs on downstream users
- value of openness and competition
- including in provision of services/technology not
just resources - are there any bargaining gains from promoting
local supplies? - Let the market decide - the premium provides
the incentive!
8Environment
- Now a key element of decision making in energy
policy - Complication for cooperation is when participants
or potential participants have adopted different
positions - eg on Kyoto
- opportunities may be lost/risk of sanctions
applied - positions need to be reviewed and reevaluated
9Government agreements
- Reduce risks in projects by making credible
commitments to each other on policy - Or provide other mechanisms for shifting that
risk (development bank models) - and in Northeast Asian context the two-way links
with security may demand more participation by
governments than in other regions - issue then is making explicit the burden and
meeting it efficiently
10Private sector
- Value of deregulation in domestic markets and
private participation in domestic and cross
border projects - imposes a test on commercial grounds (the project
finance model) - and constrains ability to pass on costs of
inefficient forms of cooperation
11Value of a dialogue
- Agenda items
- infrastructure policy (at home and across
borders), environment/Kyoto, how to apply the
principles of open regionalism - might also include
- design of tax on energy projects
- research priorities
- Value of interaction not only by governments but
also the private sector - eg on policy priorities and contract design
12Value of a dialogue
- Consistent with the open regionalism and
contestability principles - a Northeast Asian dialogue within a larger
grouping that includes other major suppliers - Australia, Southeast Asia
- the data shows they continue to be major
suppliers to the region