Other Growth Theories of mainstream economics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Other Growth Theories of mainstream economics

Description:

Other Growth Theories of mainstream economics 1. Lewis Model: Dual Sector Model of Economic Growth many LDCs had dual economies with a traditional agricultural sector ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: JD97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Other Growth Theories of mainstream economics


1
Other Growth Theories of mainstream economics
2
1. Lewis ModelDual Sector Model of Economic
Growth
  • many LDCs had dual economies with a traditional
    agricultural sector and a modern industrial
    sector
  • Traditional Sector has too much labor at
    subsistence level. It has to release excessive
    labor.
  • MPlabour 0 Y C S T C I G
  • Modern Sector absorbs labor and becomes the
    source of economic surplus or savings

3
How does the Mechanism work?
  • The lack of development was due to a lack of
    savings and investment. The key to development
    was to increase savings and investment.
  • Lewis saw the existence of the modern industrial
    sector as essential if this was to happen. A
    growing industrial sector requiring labour
    provided the incomes that could be spent and
    saved. This would in itself generate demand and
    also provide funds for investment. Income
    generated by the industrial sector was trickling
    down throughout the economy.
  • Urban migration from the poor rural areas to the
    relatively richer industrial urban areas gave
    workers the opportunities to earn higher incomes
    and crucially save more providing funds for
    entrepreneurs to investment.

4
Policy Implications of Lewis model
  • Induced Displacement of Population from Rural to
    Urban Sector
  • Government may use push and pull factors using
    Institutions or System
  • -Vanity Effect as a magnet Glamorous/modernize
    d Urban Sector versus Backward/Suppressed
    Rural Area
  • -Income Inequality is as a magnet

5
Lewis Model is Unbalanced Economic Growth
Strategy(??????????)
  • This is a practical strategy.
  • Lets reflect on side-effect/problems
  • -Sustainability in the long-run Ravaging impacts
    of labor saving technology How much and how
    long is the modern sector absorb the surplus
    labor? What will happen to no-longer-needed
    surplus labor?
  • -Inequality between agricultural industrial
    sectors
  • Income Inequality Urbanization issues
  • Urban/Modern Sector may not Save but Spend Urban
    Consumerism
  • Rural-Urban Migration is larger than what the
    urban sector can absorb Rural Poverty simply
    becomes Urban Poverty

6
Case Studies Casual Analysis
  • England in 18th Century
  • Enclosure Movement
  • U.S. in 19th century
  • Slave-Emancipation
  • Japan
  • Korea in the 1970s and the 1980s
  • New Village Movement (Sae-Ma-Eul-Un-Dong)
  • Taiwan (part of China)
  • China

7
Quantitative AnalysisIncome (Distribution)
Inequality and Economic Growth
  • Income Inequality is measured by Gini-Coefficient
  • Some international comparisons argue as economy
    grows, Gini Coefficient generally rises first and
    then fall
  • It is in line with Lewis theory Income
    inequality is not only inevitable, but also
    necessary for economic growth
  • - Case studies of Korea, Japan, and China
    (presentation)

8
2. Rostow's Model- the Stages of Economic
Development.
  • In 1960, the American Economic Historian, WW
    Rostow suggested that countries passed through
    five stages of economic development

9
  • Stage 1 Traditional Society-dominated by
    subsistence (defined as no economic surplus,
    meaning output being consumed by producers rather
    than traded)
  • -trade being carried out by barter, meaning
    goods being exchanged directly for other goods
  • -Agriculture being the most important
    industryProduction being labor intensive using
    only limited quantities of capital.
  • Stage 2 Transitional Stage (the preconditions for
    takeoff)-Increased specialization starting to
    generate surpluses for trading.
  • -an emergence of a transport infrastructure to
    support trade External trade also occurs
    concentrating on primary products Entrepreneurs
    emerge
  • -savings and investment grow.
  • Stage 3 Take Off-Rapid Industrialization or
    Industrial Revolution
  • - Growth concentrated in a few regions of the
    country and in one or two manufacturing
    industries.
  • - The level of investment reaches over 10 of
    GNP.
  • - The economic transitions are accompanied by
    the evolution of new political and social
    institutions that support the industrialization.
  • - The growth is self-sustaining investment
    leads to increasing incomes in turn generating
    more savings to finance further investment.
  • Stage 4 Drive to Maturity-Industrial
    Diversification producing a wide range of goods
    and services reliance on exports and imports may
    start decreasing
  • Stage 5 High Mass Consumption- Mass
    Consumption(????) Domestic Aggregate Demand is
    the major determinant of Business (Cycles)
  • - Consumer durable industries Service
    sector

10
Major Contribution of Rostow Model
  • Emphasis of Take-Off
  • -Economic Development is
  • not a continuous process
  • -There should be
  • some Event for Great Transformation.

11
Case Studies Catalyst for Take off
  • Catalysis for Take Off Exogenous Shocks
  • Japan
  • Meiji Revolution Korean War
  • Korea
  • President Park, Jeong Hee Vietnam War
  • China
  • Deng Xiao Pings Reform
  • Jiang Ze Mins Southern Journey(Nan Xun)
  • Iraq War?

12
  • Limitations
  • Deterministic Path for All?
  • Rostow predict that every economy is going
    through the same stage.
  • However, some economies are stuck in the first
    stage forever while other economies take off.
  • -leaving a room for cultural explanation
  • It does not set down the detailed nature of the
    pre-conditions for growth What sparks the
    take-off?
  • -Exogenous Shocks as a Catalyst for Great
    Transformation?
  • It is not very helpful as a policy prescription.
    Perhaps its main use is to highlight the need for
    investment.
  • Explaining the fast is always easier than
    Predicting the future.

13
Read a small paper on Rostow Model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com