Foundations for Mission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Foundations for Mission

Description:

John Clark, Martin Lee, Philip Knights, Janice Price, Paul Rolph, Anne Richards, Nigel Rooms A study of language, theology and praxis from the UK and Ireland perspective – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: anne3160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foundations for Mission


1
Foundations for Mission
John Clark, Martin Lee, Philip Knights, Janice
Price, Paul Rolph, Anne Richards, Nigel Rooms
  • A study of language, theology and praxis from the
    UK and Ireland perspective

2
The Task
  • The task of this study group is to explore how a
    Trinitarian understanding of God as Father, Son
    and Holy Spirit relates to the theory and
    practice of mission how the confession that God
    has a missionary identity impacts Christian
    witness how a discernment of the Trinitarian
    Gods inner relationships and love impacts
    ecclesiology, community life and society.

3
Hypothesis
  • Academic and theological task
  • Hypothesis is that what is said publicly about
    the theology of mission by UK and Ireland
    churches, agencies and institutions does not
    necessarily match up with the mission practice,
    understanding and outworking of those same
    bodies.

4
Research in Three phases
  • Website search for public language about mission
    NVIVO analysis of that language and semiotic
    analysis of sites
  • Survey using theological statements
  • In depth interviews with participants about their
    responses
  • National churches and agencies (GMN/GC/BIAMS)
  • Local churches in Nottinghamshire
  • BIAMS conference members

5
Websites NVIVO analysis
  • Transformation
  • Sharing
  • Equipping
  • Community
  • Fellowship
  • Supporting
  • Creation .

6
Some Website straplines
  • Sharing Jesus, Changing Lives Christian Care for
    Families A Community Centred on Christ for the
    New Evangelisation For People and Community
    Informing, promoting and inviting all Christians
    to respond to todays mission Where a little goes
    a long way Growing leaders, growing churches

7
Websites (Semiotic analysis)
8
Websites
  • Theological language not so important
  • Pictures, stories, welcome, portal devices send
    important messages
  • More attention needed concerning underlying
    meanings of images and web constituents
  • Some emphasis on the committed rather than the
    casual visitor
  • Can public language about mission be upheld in
    practice?

9
Survey
  • Statements about mission
  • Origin and Purpose of Gods Mission
  • Kingdom, Mission and Church
  • Who best does mission?
  • Evangelism and Mission
  • Mission and Development
  • Mission and Improving Lives
  • Mission and Other Faiths
  • God at work through.
  • Mission and Proclamation
  • Mission and Sin
  • Mission and Salvation (two statements)
  • Mission and Church (essence of the Church)
  • Mission and Church (function of the Church)
  • Mission and Partnership
  • Mission Outcomes
  • Mission Priorities page

10
Survey
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Neither agree nor disagree
  • Disagree
  • Strongly disagree
  • Challenging process but fruitful because the
    statements had to be addressed.

11
Survey results emerging themes
  • Desire to agree with mission resist disagree
  • Good language (transformation, reconciliation,
    hospitality, love) strongly affirmed
  • Negative language (confront, condemn) resisted
  • Justice deeply problematic
  • Reflection on complex issues causes some shift
  • Theology is weak driver
  • The Church is missionary, but mission is not to
    or into church

12
positivelanguage
13
Negative language
14
Theologically difficult statements
15
Justice
16
Survey process- emerging themes
  • Process helps people start to think about the
    complexity and messiness of mission
  • Need to contextualise, root ideas in story
  • It depends what you mean
  • Is and ought
  • Struggle to respond
  • Leadership questions does the team think?

17
BIAMS
  • Mission as missio dei
  • Mission as transformation
  • Mission as proclamation

18
Interview process
  • Exploring
  • 13 Questions overall
  • Experience of filling in the survey
  • agreement and disagreement
  • Dont know
  • Problem of Justice
  • Authority, Trinity, Understanding of God
  • Theological position (Bevans and Schroeder)
  • Proclamation
  • Missio Dei
  • Justice
  • Comparison of theology and mission priorities

19
The Interviewees
  • Local
  • 9 Anglicans, 2 Baptists, 1 each of Methodist,
    URC, Salvation Army, RC and Pentecostal.
  • 13M 3F 1 non-white British
  • Local Clergy in the main with some with
    denominational roles.
  • National
  • 11 in total 3 Churches, 8 Mission Agencies
  • 4 Mission agencies in Global Connections Network
  • Rest from GMN network
  • Some issues with interviewee not being the survey
    respondent

20
In-depth interviews local headlines
  • Clergy universally convinced of the local
    missionary task as core purpose of the church
  • Some evidence of receptivity of Missio Dei, but
    only some an adoption distribution curve?
  • Many want to hold to a holistic approach while a
    majority when pressed will prioritise
    proclamation of Christ

21
In-depth interviews national headlines
  • Leadership tensions representation difference
    between churches and agencies
  • Awareness of Missio Dei (esp. agencies) but not
    foremost driver
  • Desire to root things in theological reflections
    and story
  • justice as problematic word
  • holistic emerges again

22
Further Analysis mission drivers
  • Wide range of understandings of mission
  • Congregations lag behind
  • Authority for mission Mt. 2819-20
  • Institution as a drag as well as driver

23
Further Analysis Justice
  • In local churches not much enthusiasm
  • part of the whole
  • Justice as simple charity
  • In national interviews Justice as a means to an
    end
  • holistic a get out jail free card?

24
Further Analysis God of Mission
  • In Local Churches one third very clear
  • only two give a fully Trinitarian answer
  • one third thrown by the question silenced for
    some time and then talk about mission in general
  • spirituality of mission is missing here
  • Nationally little evidence of spirituality in
    mission

25
Conclusions
  • Public mission language does not match mission
    reality
  • Websites have hidden potential that is probably
    not realised
  • Mission has common assent but prioritising
    action in mission is difficult
  • Most response to relational language and themes
  • Resistance to negative, separating language
  • Theology is a weak driver, mostly Matthew 28.19
  • Justice is a problem
  • Need to contextualise what mission is in
    experience
  • Gap between leadership and ordinary Christians

26
Outcomes
  • Process just as important as results and felt to
    be useful so production of
  • Tool for web analysis and thinking about design
    for mission messages
  • Adaptations of the survey for different
    constituencies to do mission audit
  • Template of questions for discussion or interview
    for mission reflection

27
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com