Social Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Psychology

Description:

Title: Ch. 3 Author: Joyce Bishop Last modified by: image Created Date: 6/18/2001 1:30:19 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Joyc130
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Psychology


1
Social Psychology
  • Chapter 15

2
Social Psychology
  • The scientific study of the ways in which the
    thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of one
    individual are influenced by the real, imagined,
    or inferred behavior or characteristics of other
    people

3
Social Cognition
  • How do we explain, interpret and judge behavior?

4
Impression Formation What do we think of others
behavior?
  • Schema a set of beliefs or expectations about
    something/someone based on past experiences
  • Ready-made category
  • Allows us to make inferences about others
  • Also plays a major role in how we interpret and
    remember information
  • E.g. if we witness a mother reprimanding her
    child at the supermarket, we might assume she is
    a bad or abusive mother because we saw something
    similar in a Lifetime movie, and we may even
    assign her other traits that go along with this
    assumption even if she doesnt actually
    demonstrate those traits!

5
Impression FormationWhat do we think of others
behavior?
  • Primacy effect early information is a greater
    determinant of
  • Early information about someone makes a greater
    impact than later information in forming
    impressions
  • Cognitive Misers
  • Humans dont like to spend too much time figuring
    people out
  • Go with the initial impression to save time

6
Impression FormationWhat do we think of others
behavior?
  • Self-fulfilling prophecy
  • A persons expectations about another elicits
    behavior from the other person that confirms the
    expectations
  • e.g. High school coach is told by middle school
    coach that a player coming up is amazing. High
    school coach treats this player as though s/he is
    talented, and the player responds accordingly,
    confirming the initial belief.
  • Stereotypes
  • A set of characteristics believed to be shared
    by all members of a social category
  • Can become the basis for self-fulfilling
    prophecies
  • e.g. Elderly people are cheap! You are a waiter
    in a restaurant and make this assumption, so you
    dont provide the greatest service. Then your
    tip is smaller and you believe it is because the
    old people are cheap!

7
AttributionHow do we explain behavior?
  • Theory that addresses the question of how people
    make judgments about the causes of behavior
  • e.g. Why did I fail the test?
  • e.g. Why did my best friend stop talking to me?
  • Heider (1958) says we first decide if the cause
    is personal (internal attribution) or situational
    (external attribution).
  • Personal/Internal Behavior caused by that
    individuals characteristics
  • Situational/External Circumstances prompted the
    individuals behavior

8
AttributionHow do we explain behavior?
  • Three criteria used to judge behavior as personal
    or situational (Kelley, 1967)
  • Distinctiveness How do the persons responses
    vary from situation to situation?
  • Consistency Has this behavior occurred before?
  • Consensus Do other people behave this way?
  • If the behavior is low on consistency, we
    attribute the behavior to a passing situational
    factor right away.
  • e.g. I have never failed a psych test before! It
    was just a one-time, unusual occurrence due to
    the unique situation. I had an AP test that day
    so I couldnt study for my psych test thats
    why I failed!
  • If the behavior is low on distinctiveness and
    consensus, but high in consistency, we would say
    the cause is internal or personal.
  • e.g. I often fail tests. Nobody else failed the
    psych test. Its ME!
  • If the behavior is high on distinctiveness and
    consensus, but high on consistency, we say the
    cause is external or situational.
  • e.g. I never fail tests! Everyone else also
    failed this test. Its the TEST!

9
Biases in Attribution
  • Fundamental Attribution Error
  • Tendency to overemphasize personal causes for
    others behavior and underemphasize personal
    causes for our own behavior
  • e.g. She cut me off because she is a terrible
    driver!
  • e.g. I cut someone else off because I am late
    for work.
  • Defensive attribution and the Self-Serving Bias
  • Tendency to attribute our successes to our own
    efforts and our failures to external factors
  • e.g. I failed the test because the teacher made
    it impossible and clearly she hates me! OR I
    got an A because Im a genius!
  • Just-World Hypothesis
  • Assumption bad things happen to bad people and
    good things happen to good people
  • e.g. She got herpes because she is a strumpet!
  • e.g. She will win the election because shes
    sooooo nice.
  • Attribution across cultures varies dramatically
  • E.g. Japanese vs. American students and
    explaining academic performance
  • Why do we have these biases?

10
Interpersonal AttractionWhat determines whether
we like someone?
  • Attraction is closely linked to
  • 1. Proximity/propinquity
  • We are attracted to people who are in the same
    space as we are
  • Has the internet changed this at all?
  • 2. Physical attractiveness
  • We like physically attractive people!
  • Being with hot people makes us feel like we are
    hot, too!
  • 3. Similarity
  • In attitudes, interests, values, and background
  • Opposites only attract for the short term
  • 4. Exchange how do we reward each other?
  • We like people who appreciate us
  • Should be even
  • 5. Intimacy how much trust and closeness is
    there?
  • Self disclosure
  • Should be equal
  • Impact of physical attractiveness on attribution
    and on impression formation
  • Beauty and the Best article
  • People believe that physically attractive
    individuals are smarter, friendlier, and
    generally better based solely on their physical
    attributes!

11
Attitudes
12
AttitudesIs a persons behavior a reflection of
his/her attitudes?
  • Attitudes are relatively stable beliefs,
    feelings, and behaviors directed toward
    something/someone
  • Typically, feelings and beliefs about a
    person/thing correspond with behaviors toward
    that person/thing, but not always
  • Self-monitoring tendency to observe a situation
    to determine how best to act.
  • High self-monitors look for social cues about how
    they are expected to behave in a given situation,
    overriding their attitudes, making it difficult
    to predict behavior based on attitudes.
  • Low self-monitors express and act on their
    attitudes consistently making prediction easier.

13
Attitude Development
  • Many factors contribute to the development of
    attitudes
  • Imitation
  • Reward
  • Teachers
  • Peers
  • Mass media

14
Prejudice and Discrimination
  • Prejudice
  • An intolerant, unfavorable, and rigid attitude
    toward a group of people negative stereotypes.
  • Ultimate Attribution Error tendency to use
    stereotyped beliefs about a group to make
    internal attributions about shortcomings and
    external attributions about successes.
  • Discrimination
  • An act or series of acts that denies
    opportunities and social esteem to an entire
    group of people or individual members of that
    group

15
Sources of PrejudiceWhere does it come from?
  • Frustration-aggression theory
  • People who are frustrated in their goals may turn
    their anger away from the proper target toward
    another, less powerful target
  • Authoritarian personality
  • Personality pattern characterized by rigid
    conventionality, exaggerated respect for
    authority, and hostility toward those who defy
    social norms
  • Racism
  • Prejudice and discrimination directed at
    particular racial group based on the belief that
    certain groups are innately inferior
  • What Would You Do part 1
  • What Would You Do part 2
  • In-Group Bias Belief that those with whom you
    identify are not only different, but BETTER than
    those outside the group.

16
Reducing Prejudice
  • Recategorization
  • Try to expand our schema for a particular group
  • What qualities are shared between groups
  • Controlled processing
  • Train ourselves to be more mindful of people who
    differ from us
  • Think about examples that fall outside the
    stereotypes
  • Improving contact between groups
  • Group members must have equal status
  • Need one-on-one contact with other group
  • Relations are improved when groups come together
    to cooperate
  • Social norms should encourage contact

17
Inducing Prejudice Jane Elliott
  • Elementary education teacher Jane Elliot wanted
    to teach her class about discrimination after the
    assassination of Martin Luther King.
  • She designed an experiment to show how easily
    children could be transformed into prejudiced
    monsters.
  • A Class Divided video on Elliotts work

18
Attitude ChangeWhat makes us change our mind?
  • Process of persuasion
  • Must pay attention to the message
  • Must comprehend the message
  • Comprehension leads to acceptance
  • Communication model
  • Source credible spokesperson?
  • Message present both sides!
  • Medium written for complex messages video for
    more simple face to face is best!
  • Audience how committed is audience to their
    point of view?
  • People with low self esteem easier to change
  • Intelligent people more resistant to change

19
Attitude Change
  • Cognitive Dissonance (Leon Festinger)
  • Perceived inconsistency between two cognitions
  • e.g. I am an honest person and I cheated on
    the test
  • Dissonance can be reduced through attitude change
  • e.g. I am not that honest
  • An alternative is to increase the number thoughts
    that support one or the other dissonant
    cognitions
  • e.g. I have never stolen, never gotten arrested,
    never cheated on a FINAL, etc.

20
Social Influence
21
Cultural Influence
  • Culture greatly influences attitudes and
    behaviors
  • Cultural truism
  • Beliefs that most members of a society accept as
    self-evidently true
  • People in the culture do not question these
  • e.g. Eating dog is unacceptable.
  • Truisms are the backbone of norms, shared
    expectations about how to behave in a given
    culture.

22
Cultural Assimilators
  • Not all cultures are the same, and not all
    cultures have the same norms.
  • People in a given culture may feel their way is
    the right way, and other cultures are
    backwards.
  • This is the basis of ethnocentrism, or the belief
    that ones own culture superior.
  • Examining cultural assimilators helps to reduce
    these assumptions.
  • Cultural assimilators are the explanations for
    why members of a culture have a particular
    behavior.
  • Understanding cultural assimilators helps people
    to maintain an open mind about other cultures
    norms and values.

23
Conformity
  • Voluntarily yielding to social norms, even at the
    expense of ones own preferences
  • Asch Experiment
  • Conformity across cultures
  • Tends to be higher in collectivist cultures

24
Compliance
  • Change in behavior in response to an explicit
    request from another person or group
  • Work of Robert Cialdini and the methods of
    gaining compliance
  • Foot-in-the-door effect Get them to say yes to a
    small request first
  • Lowball procedure Get compliance then raise
    price of compliance
  • Door-in-the-face effect Get them to decline
    large request then ask something smaller

25
Obedience
  • Change in behavior in response to a command from
    another person, typically an authority figure
  • Milgrams studies on obedience show willingness
    to follow commands
  • Milgram Revisited

26
Social Action
27
Social Action
  • Deindividuation
  • Loss of personal sense of responsibility in a
    group
  • People more likely to engage in risky behavior
    when anonymous
  • Helps to explain mob behavior
  • Mob Behavior also facilitated by the snowball
    effect, when one vocal person convinces a few
    people, who convince a few more, etc.
  • Helping Behavior
  • Altruistic behavior
  • Helping behavior that is not linked to personal
    gain
  • Bystander effect
  • Helpfulness decreases as bystanders increase
  • Kitty Genovese Case and the bystander effect
  • Mood can affect willingness to help
  • Cultures differ in amount of help offered in
    response to requests for minor help (collective
    cultures more willing)

28
Group Decision Making
  • Risky Shift
  • Increased willingness to take risks when making
    decisions as a group as opposed to making
    decisions as individuals.
  • Polarization in group decision making
  • Shift toward more extreme position following
    group discussion
  • The effectiveness of groups
  • The more people in the group
  • The more stable the group is
  • The less cohesive/efficient the group may become
  • Social loafing
  • Tendency to expend less effort when part of a
    large group
  • Groupthink
  • Pressure to conform to group

29
Leadership
  • Great person theory
  • Personal qualities qualify one to lead
  • Right place-right time theory
  • Circumstances are optimal for individual with
    particular characteristics
  • Fielders Contingency Theory
  • Depends on the traits of the leader, the
    circumstances, and the interaction of the group
    itself.
  • Task-Oriented vs. Relationship Oriented Leaders
  • In extreme circumstances very good or very bad
    best to be task oriented.
  • In moderate circumstances, best to be
    relationship oriented.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com