Some Topics In Multivariate Regression - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Some Topics In Multivariate Regression

Description:

Some Topics In Multivariate Regression – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Vince145
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some Topics In Multivariate Regression


1
Some Topics In Multivariate Regression
2
Some Topics
  1. Confidence intervals
  2. Dummy Variables
  3. One sided tests
  4. Scale of data
  5. Functional Form

3
Woldridge refs
  • Chapter 1
  • Chapter 2.1, 2.2,2.3,2.5
  • Chapter 3.1,3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5
  • Chapter 4.1, 4.2, 4.5, 4.6
  • Chapter 5

4
1. Confidence Intervals (4.3)
  • We can construct an interval within which the
    true value of the parameter lies
  • We have seen that
  • P(-1.96 t 1.96)0.95 for large N-K
  • More generally

5
  • Interval b tc se(b) will contain b with (1-a)
    confidence.
  • Where tc is critical value and is determined
    by the significance level (a) and the degrees of
    freedom (dfN-K)
  • For the case where N-K is large (gt100) and a is
    5 then tc 1.96
  • Same as the set of values of beta, which could
    not be rejected if they were null hypotheses
  • The range of possible values consistent with the
    data
  • A way of avoiding some of the ambiguity in the
    formulation of hypothesis tests
  • Formally A procedure which will generate an
    interval containing the true value (1-a) times
    in repeated samples

6
2. Dummy Variables
  • Wooldridge Chapter 7.1-7.4
  • Record classifications
  • Dichotomous yes/no e.g. trial, gender etc
  • Ordinal e.g. level of education
  • OLS doesnt treat them differently
  • Need to be careful about how coefficients are
    interpreted
  • Illustrate with sex in the wage regression
  • Use labour2006.dta and dummy.do
  • Sex 1 iff female sex0 iff male

7
  • Our basic model is
  • wagei ?1 ?2 educi ui
  • This can be interpreted a predicting wages based
    on schooling i.e.
  • Ewagei ?1 ?2 Eeduci
  • Suspect that wages are systematically different
    between men and women
  • wagei ?1 ?2 educi ?3 sexi ui

8
  • Now the prediction becomes
  • Ewagei ?1 ?2 Eeduci ?3 if female
  • Ewagei ?1 ?2 Eeduci if male
  • Note that sex disappears when it is zero
  • This translates into separate intercepts on the
    graph
  • The extra for being a woman
  • Testing if ?3 is significant is test of
    significant difference in wages between the two
    groups

9
(No Transcript)
10
Interaction
  • While the intercept could be different the slope
    could be also
  • i.e. the degree of discrimination could be
    different between the two groups
  • Different returns to education
  • Model this by an interaction term
  • wagei ?1 ?2 educi ?3 sexi
  • ?4 educisexi ui

11
  • Now the prediction becomes
  • Ewagei ?1 (?2 ?4 )Eeduci ?3 if
    woman
  • Ewagei ?1 ?2 Eeduci if man
  • Note that sex disappears when it is zero
  • This translates into separate intercepts and
    slopes on the graph
  • The extra for bringing a woman and an extra
    for each levl of education
  • Testing if ?4 is significant is test of
    significant difference in return to education
    between the two groups

12
(No Transcript)
13
3. One Tailed Test (4.2)
  • Need to be careful about the interpretation of
    the null and alternative
  • Think of example of gender discrimination
  • State the Hypothesis we want to test
  • H0 bsex gt 0 H1 bsex lt 0
  • Calculate the test statistic assuming that H0 0
    true.
  • t-8.33
  • Reject null if tlt-critical value at chosen sig
    level
  • Can reject null as -8.58lt-1.64

14
Acceptance Region
15
(No Transcript)
16
  • Which you use is up to you. But
  • Beware of translating directly from English
  • Be aware of the implications
  • Rule of thumb
  • H1 what you expect e.g. guilt
  • H0 what you fear e.g. innocent
  • So the test procedure minimizes the prob of
    rejecting what you fear when it is true
  • This notion works for a two sided test also

17
  • Redo the gender discrimination example from the
    other side
  • State the Hypothesis we want to test
  • H0 bsex lt 0 H1 bsex gt0
  • Calculate the test statistic assuming that H0 0
    true.
  • t-8.33
  • Reject null if tgt critical value at chosen sig
    level
  • Cannot reject null as -8.58lt1.64

18
(No Transcript)
19
The difference between the two
  • The first H0 bsex gt 0 H1 bsex lt 0
  • 5 chance of rejecting null when it is correct
  • i.e. of stating bsex lt 0 when in fact bsex gt 0
  • i.e. of stating there is discrimination when in
    fact there is none
  • The second H0 bsex lt 0 H1 bsex gt 0
  • 5 chance of rejecting null when it is correct
  • i.e. of stating bsex gt 0 when in fact bsex lt 0
  • i.e. of stating there is no discrimination when
    in fact there is some

20
4. Scale (2.4 6.1)
  • The scale of the data may matter
  • i.e. whether we measure consumption in or bn
    or even
  • Basic model yi b1 b2 xi ei
  • Change scale of xi xi xi/c
  • Estimate yi b1 b2 xi ei
  • b2 c.b2
  • se(b2) c.se(b2)
  • Slope coefficient and se change, all other
    statistics (t-stats, R2, F, etc.) unchanged.

21
  • Change scale of yi yi yi/c
  • Estimate yi b1 b2 xi ei
  • b2 b2 /c
  • b1 b1 /c
  • se(b2) se(b2)/c
  • se(b1) se(b1)/c
  • t-stats, R2, F unchanged
  • Both X and Y rescaled yi yi/c, xi xi/c
  • Estimate yi b1 b2 x ei
  • If rescaled by same amount
  • b1 b1 /c se(b1) se(b1)/c
  • b2 and se(b2) unchanged
  • t-stats, R2, F unchanged

22
5. Functional Form (6.2)
  • Four common functional forms
  • Linear qt a ?pt ut
  • Log-Log lnqt a ?lnpt ut
  • Semilog qt a ?lnpt ut
  • or lnqt a ?pt ut
  • How to choose?
  • Which fits the data best (cannot compare R2
    unless y is same)
  • Which is most convenient (do we want elasticity,
    rate of return?)
  • How trade-off two goals

23
Elasticity and Marginal Effects
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com