Sorting Algorithms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sorting Algorithms

Description:

Sorting Algorithms Motivation Example: Phone Book Searching If the phone book was in random order, we would probably never use the phone! Let s say second per ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Wake65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sorting Algorithms


1
Sorting Algorithms
2
Motivation
  • Example Phone Book Searching
  • If the phone book was in random order, we would
    probably never use the phone!
  • Lets say ½ second per entry
  • There are 70,000 households in Ilam
  • 35,000 seconds 10hrs to find a phone number!
  • Best time ½ second
  • average time is about 5 hrs

3
Motivation
  • The phone book is sorted
  • Jump directly to the letter of the alphabet we
    are interested in using
  • Scan quickly to find the first two letters that
    are really close to the name we are interested in
  • Flip whole pages at a time if not close enough

4
The Big Idea
  • Take a set of N randomly ordered pieces of data
    aj and rearrange data such that for all j (j gt
    0 and j lt N), R holds, for relational operator R
  • a0 R a1 R a2 R aj R aN-1 R aN
  • If R is lt, we are doing an ascending sort Each
    consecutive item in the list is going to be
    larger than the previous
  • If R is gt, we are doing a descending sort
    Items get smaller as move down the list

5
Queue Example Radix Sort
  • Also called bin sort
  • Repeatedly shuffle data into small bins
  • Collect data from bins into new deck
  • Repeat until sorted
  • Appropriate method of shuffling and collecting?
  • For integers, key is to shuffle data into bins
    on a per digit basis, starting with the rightmost
    (ones digit)
  • Collect in order, from bin 0 to bin 9, and left
    to right within a bin

6
Radix Sort Ones Digit
  • Data 459 254 472 534 649 239 432 654 477
  • Bin 0
  • Bin 1
  • Bin 2 472 432
  • Bin 3
  • Bin 4 254 534 654
  • Bin 5
  • Bin 6
  • Bin 7 477
  • Bin 8
  • Bin 9 459 649 239
  • After Call 472 432 254 534 654 477 459 649
    239

7
Radix Sort Tens Digit
  • Data 472 432 254 534 654 477 459 649 239
  • Bin 0
  • Bin 1
  • Bin 2
  • Bin 3 432 534 239
  • Bin 4 649
  • Bin 5 254 654 459
  • Bin 6
  • Bin 7 472 477
  • Bin 8
  • Bin 9
  • After Call 432 534 239 649 254 654 459 472 477

8
Radix Sort Hundreds Digit
  • Data 432 534 239 649 254 654 459 472 477
  • Bin 0
  • Bin 1
  • Bin 2 239 254
  • Bin 3
  • Bin 4 432 459 472 477
  • Bin 5 534
  • Bin 6 649 654
  • Bin 7
  • Bin 8
  • Bin 9
  • Final Sorted Data 239 254 432 459 472 477 534
    649 654

9
Radix Sort Algorithm
  • Begin with current digit as ones digit
  • While there is still a digit on which to classify
  • For each number in the master list,
  • Add that number to the appropriate sublist
    keyed on the current digit
  • For each sublist from 0 to 9
  • For each number in the sublist
  • Remove the number from the sublist and append
    to a new master list
  • Advance the current digit one place to the left.

10
Radix Sort and Queues
  • Each list (the master list (all items) and bins
    (per digit)) needs to be first in, first out
    ordered perfect for a queue.

11
A Quick Tangent
  • How fast have the sorts youve seen before
    worked?
  • Bubble, Insertion, Selection O(n2)
  • We will see sorts that are better, and in fact
    optimal for general sorting algorithms
  • Merge/Quicksort O(n log n)
  • How fast is radix sort?

12
Analysis of Radix Sort
  • Let n be the number of items to sort
  • Outer loop control is on maximum length of input
    numbers in digits (Let this be d)
  • For every digit,
  • Assign each number to sort to a group (n
    operations)
  • Pull each number back into the master list (n
    operations)
  • Overall running time 2 n d gt O(n)

13
Analysis of Radix Sort
  • O(n log n) is optimal for general sorting
    algorithms
  • Radix sort is O(n)? How does that work?
  • Radix sort is not a general sorting algorithm
    It cant sort arbitrary information Rectangles
    objects, Automobiles objects, etc are no good.
  • Can sort items that can be broken into
    constituent pieces and whose pieces can be
    ordered
  • Integers (digits), Strings (characters)

14
Sorting Algorithms
  • What does sorting really require?
  • Compare pieces of data at different positions
  • Swap the data at those positions until order is
    correct

20
3
18
9
5
15
Selection Sort
  • void selectionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 0 k lt size-1 k)
  • int index mininumIndex(a, k, size)
  • swap(ak,aindex)
  • int minimumIndex(int a, int first, int last)
  • int minIndex first
  • for (int j first 1 j lt last j)
  • if (aj lt aminIndex) minIndex j
  • return minIndex

16
Selection Sort
  • What is selection sort doing?
  • Repeatedly
  • Finding smallest element by searching through
    list
  • Inserting at front of list
  • Moving front of list forward by 1

17
Selection Sort Step Through
20
3
18
9
5
minIndex(a, 0, 5) ? 1 swap (a0,a1)
18
Order From Previous
Find minIndex (a, 1, 5) 4
Find minIndex (a, 2, 5) 3
19
Find minIndex (a, 3, 5) 3
K 4 size-1 Done!
20
Cost of Selection Sort
  • void selectionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 0 k lt size-1 k)
  • int index mininumIndex(a, k, size)
  • swap(ak,aindex)
  • int minimumIndex(int a, int first, int last)
  • int minIndex first
  • for (int j first 1 j lt last j)
  • if (aj lt aminIndex) minIndex j
  • return minIndex

21
Cost of Selection Sort
  • How many times through outer loop?
  • Iteration is for k 0 to lt (N-1) gt N-1 times
  • How many comparisons in minIndex?
  • Depends on outer loop Consider 5 elements
  • K 0 j 1,2,3,4
  • K 1 j 2, 3, 4
  • K 2 j 3, 4
  • K 3 j 4
  • Total comparisons is equal to 4 3 2 1,
    which is N-1 N-2 N-3 1
  • What is that sum?

22
Cost of Selection Sort
  • (N-1) (N-2) (N-3) 3 2 1
  • (N-1) 1 (N-2) 2 (N-3) 3
  • N N N gt repeated addition of N
  • How many repeated additions?
  • There were n-1 total starting objects to add, we
    grouped every 2 together approximately N/2
    repeated additions
  • gt Approximately N N/2 O(N2) comparisons

23
Insertion Sort
  • void insertionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 1 k lt size k)
  • int temp ak
  • int position k
  • while (position gt 0 aposition-1 gt temp)
  • aposition aposition-1
  • position--
  • aposition temp

24
Insertion Sort
  • List of size 1 (first element) is already sorted
  • Repeatedly
  • Chooses new item to place in list (ak)
  • Starting at back of the list, if new item is less
    than item at current position, shift current data
    right by 1.
  • Repeat shifting until new item is not less than
    thing in front of it.
  • Insert the new item

25
Insertion Sort Step Through
Single card list already sorted
20
3
18
9
5
A1
A2
A3
A4
A0
Move 3 left until hits something smaller
20
3
18
9
5
A2
A3
A4
A0
A1
26
Move 3 left until hits something smaller Now
two sorted
18
9
5
3
20
A2
A3
A4
A0
A1
Move 18 left until hits something smaller
20
18
3
9
5
A3
A4
A0
A1
A2
27
Move 18 left until hits something smaller Now
three sorted
9
5
3
18
20
A3
A4
A0
A1
A2
Move 9 left until hits something smaller
3
20
9
18
5
A4
A0
A1
A2
A3
28
Move 9 left until hits something smaller Now
four sorted
3
9
18
20
5
A4
A0
A1
A2
A3
Move 5 left until hits something smaller
3
9
18
20
5
A0
A1
A2
A3
A4
29
Move 5 left until hits something smaller Now
all five sorted Done
3
9
18
20
5
A0
A1
A2
A3
A4
30
Cost of Insertion Sort
  • void insertionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 1 k lt size k)
  • int temp ak
  • int position k
  • while (position gt 0 aposition-1 gt temp)
  • aposition aposition-1
  • position--
  • aposition temp

31
Cost of Insertion Sort
  • Outer loop
  • K 1 to lt size 1,2,3,4 gt N-1
  • Inner loop
  • Worst case Compare against all items in list
  • Inserting new smallest thing
  • K 1, 1 step (position k 1, while position gt
    0)
  • K 2, 2 steps position 2,1
  • K 3, 3 steps position 3,2,1
  • K 4, 4 steps position 4,3,2,1
  • Again, worst case total comparisons is equal to
    sum of I from 1 to N-1, which is O(N2)

32
Cost of Swaps
  • Selection Sort
  • void selectionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 0 k lt size-1 k)
  • int index mininumIndex(a, k, size)
  • swap(ak,aindex)
  • One swap each time, for O(N) swaps

33
Cost of Swaps
  • Insertion Sort
  • void insertionSort(int a, int size)
  • for (int k 1 k lt size k)
  • int temp ak
  • int position k
  • while (position gt 0 aposition-1 gt temp)
  • aposition aposition-1
  • position--
  • aposition temp
  • Do a shift almost every time do compare, so O(n2)
    shifts
  • Shifts are faster than swaps (1 step vs 3 steps)
  • Are we doing few enough of them to make up the
    difference?

34
Another Issue - Memory
  • Space requirements for each sort?
  • All of these sorts require the space to hold the
    array - O(N)
  • Require temp variable for swaps
  • Require a handful of counters
  • Can all be done in place, so equivalent in
    terms of memory costs
  • Not all sorts can be done in place though!

35
Which O(n2) Sort to Use?
  • Insertion sort is the winner
  • Worst case requires all comparisons
  • Most cases dont (jump out of while loop early)
  • Selection use for loops, go all the way through
    each time

36
Tradeoffs
  • Given random data, when is it more efficient to
  • Just search versus
  • Insertion Sort and search
  • Assume Z searches
  • Search on random data Z O(n)
  • Sort and binary search O(n2) Z log2n

37
Tradeoffs
  • Z n lt n2 (Z log2n)
  • Z n Z log2n lt n2
  • Z (n-log2n) lt n2
  • Z lt n2/(n-log2n)
  • For large n, log2n is dwarfed by n in (n-log2n)
  • Z lt n2/n
  • Z lt n (approximately)

38
Improving Sorts
  • Better sorting algorithms rely on divide and
    conquer (recursion)
  • Find an efficient technique for splitting data
  • Sort the splits separately
  • Find an efficient technique for merging the data
  • Well see two examples
  • One does most of its work splitting
  • One does most of its work merging
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com