VCU School of Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

VCU School of Business

Description:

Undergraduates Self-Efficacy Perceptions and Their Use of Online Library Research Services Deborah Cowles Jill Stover Virginia Commonwealth University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: HPAutho93
Category:
Tags: vcu | bandura | business | school

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VCU School of Business


1
Undergraduates Self-Efficacy Perceptions and
Their Use of Online Library Research Services
  • Deborah Cowles
  • Jill Stover
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Richmond, Virginia

2
Where we stand today
  • Computer- and Internet-savvy undergraduates
  • Ubiquitous Google, Wikipedia, etc.
  • Un- or under-used electronic library research
    resources
  • OCLC Perceptions Report
  • Missed opportunities

3
As one library professional put it
  • They students slap down a few citations from
    Wikipedia (which comes up on many top results of
    research type queries, because of Googles
    linking nature), and, with smiles on their faces,
    they hand in their work
    without even learning
    one thing about real
    research. Steven Cohen

4
Hypothesis 1
  • When asked to complete an academic research
    assignment requiring a specific number of
    scholarly references, undergraduate students will
    spend a significantly larger percentage of their
    time searching for information via non-library
    Internet sources, as opposed to using online
    information services available to them through
    their campus library.

5
Operational definitions
  • Non-library Internet sources
  • Google, Wikipedia, other Web resources not owned
    by library
  • Online library resources
  • Resources made available by librarys paid
    subscriptions (ex InfoTrac, online journals,
    e-books, etc.)
  • Tangible library resources
  • Print materials including monographs,
    encyclopedias, magazines, etc.

6
Results 9.86 hrs. average research
  • 2.2 would NOT use online/non-library resources
    (i.e., the Internet)
  • 7.1 would NOT use online resources of campus
    library
  • 21.4 would NOT use tangible (brick-and-mortar)
    library resources
  • 52.7 would NOT use other resources

7
Percent of time each category
  • 43 of time using online/non-library resources
    (i.e., the Internet)
  • 34 of time using online resources of campus
    library
  • 18 of time using tangible resources of campus
    library
  • 5 of time using other resources

8
Bar graph of time
9
Why its important
  • Information overload
  • Electronic information literacy
  • Marketing students especially need to
  • Develop search skills/strategies
  • Use information resources for all types of
    research and business opportunities
  • Know how to organize, communicate and present
    research results

10
Search as a consumption decision
  • Undergraduates decide if to use, how to use, how
    much to use research-service options available to
    them
  • Physical library
  • Electronic library resources
  • Internet
  • Other research resources

11
Self-Efficacy vs. Self-Confidence
  • As opposed to generalized self-confidence,
    self-efficacy refers to how a person perceives
    his or her abilities as they apply to a specific
    task.
  • Bandura Given appropriate skills and adequate
    incentivesefficacy expectations are a major
    determinant of peoples choice of activities, how
    much effort they will expend, and of how long
    they will sustain effort.

12
Self-Efficacy Services Marketing
  • Self-efficacy theory has broad implications for
    service providers, since service customers more
    often than not participate in the production of
    service offerings.
  • Perceived self-efficacy is a factor in
  • whether consumers will choose to use a service
  • how long they will persist in using the service
    to achieve their goals
  • their level of motivation and attitudes toward
    the service
  • their performance outcomes

13
Hypothesis 2
  • Undergraduates perceived self-efficacy regarding
    use of online academic library research services
    is positively related to their intention to use
    such services H 2A, the relative amount of time
    they will spend using online library resources
    vis-à-vis other information sources H 2B, and
    their attitude toward using such services H 2C.

14
Perceived Self-Efficacy Items With Mean Scores
Item Students were asked to indicate their agreement/disagreement with the following statements ranging from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 6 (Strongly Disagree) Mean Score
1 I have successfully used the campus librarys electronic resources to complete a class assignment involving academic research. 1.94
2 When faced with the requirement for a class assignment to conduct academic research, my professors/instructors encourage me to use the electronic resources of the campus library. 2.16
3 In the past, I have experienced anxiety and/or stress when Ive been expected to use the campus librarys electronic resources to conduct academic research for a classroom assignment. 3.80
4 My friends and acquaintances at this university routinely use the campus librarys electronic resources to conduct academic research for classroom assignments. 2.91
5 I would feel stressed out if I received a class assignment that required me to use the campus librarys electronic resources to conduct academic research. 4.25
6 Compared to my friends and classmates at this university, I know more about using the campus librarys electronic resources to conduct academic research for classroom assignments than they do. 3.53
7 I meet my professors expectations when it comes to conducting academic research using the electronic resources at the campus library. 2.48
Note Mean scores reported here are prior to reverse coding of negatively worded items (3 and 5). Also, in the original questionnaire, the name of the university was inserted into bracketed items shown here. Note Mean scores reported here are prior to reverse coding of negatively worded items (3 and 5). Also, in the original questionnaire, the name of the university was inserted into bracketed items shown here. Note Mean scores reported here are prior to reverse coding of negatively worded items (3 and 5). Also, in the original questionnaire, the name of the university was inserted into bracketed items shown here.
15
Findings
  • H 2A H 2B
  • High (39)
  • Med SE (30)
  • Low SE (21)
  • H 2C High SE students have more favorable
    attitude.
  • Role of past performance and instructor
    involvement

16
Summer Research Grant
  • Possible directions
  • Uses Gratifications Theory
  • Marketing Communications

17
Thank you!
  • Dr. Deborah Cowles
  • VCU School of Business
  • Department of Marketing
  • E-mail dcowles_at_vcu.edu
  • Ms. Jill S. Stover, MSLS
  • Undergraduate Services Librarian
  • James Branch Cabell Library, VCU
  • E-mail jsstover_at_vcu.edu
  • URL
  • http//www.people.vcu.edu/jsstover/acme/acme2007
    .ppt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com