Background - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Background

Description:

Title: Author: ddd Last modified by: reg Created Date: 7/16/2006 10:24:42 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: ddd60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Background


1
???????????????????
  • ????????
  • ?????????
  • 2006?7?19?

2
Background
3
Hemochromatosis
  • ?????( Hemochromatosis)
  • Hereditary Hemochromatosis
  • Secondary Iron Overload
  • Iron-loading anemias /- transfusion
  • Thalassemia major
  • Sideroblastic anemia
  • Other chronic hemolytic anemias
  • Dietary iron overload
  • Chronic liver diseases
  • Hepatitis C and B
  • Alcohol-induced liver disease
  • Porphyria cutanea tarda
  • Fatty liver disease
  • Miscellaneous causes of iron overload
  • African iron overload
  • Neonatal iron overload
  • Aceruloplasminemia
  • Congenital atransferrinemia

4
Iron metabolism
5
Iron metabolism
6
Toxicity of Iron Non-transferrin bound iron
  • Fe--(catalytic reaction)--gt free hydroxyl radical
    --gt lipid peroxidation of cellular organelle
  • catalytic reaction inhibited by strong binding
    between plasma iron transport protein
  • heavy iron-loaded state--gt fully saturation of
    transferrin --gt nontransferrin-bound iron
  • Effect of iron chelating agent is induced by
    power of binding with nontransferrin bound iron

7
The impact of iron overload
8
Assessment of body iron
  • Hepatic iron concentration(HIC)
  • most quantitative, specific sensitive method,
    but invasive
  • Serum ferritin
  • - the most commonly used indirect estimate of
    body iron stores
  • - influenced by ascorbate deficiency, fever,
    acute infection, inflammation etc.
  • - 95 prediction intervals for hepatic iron
    concentration,given the plasma ferritin ,were so
    broad to make determination of plasma ferritin a
    poor predictor of body stores.

9
Iron chelating agents
10
Deferoxamine
  • Since 1960s
  • The only iron-chelating agent presently available
    for clinical use (before L1 approval)
  • Striking improvement of survival in thalassemia
  • Poorly absorbed orally and rapidly metabolized in
    plasma principal drawback.
  • ? the requirement for prolonged parenteral
    infusions during which plasma concentrations
    reach a plateau at 12hrs
  • nightly 12hrs subcutaneous infusion, 5d/wk

11
Toxicity of deferoxamine
  • Local erythema ,painful subcutaneous nodule at
    infusion site
  • Allergic reaction
  • Neurosensory toxicity
  • high frequency hearing loss
  • night color blindness
  • Cartilagenous dysplasia interfere linear growth

12
Cartilagenous dysplasia
3 years later
6 years later
initially
13
Orally active iron chelator deferiprone
  • First reviewed by representatives of the FDA in
    1991, at which time approval was refused.
  • At the second review in 1993, the FDA required
  • 1) a prospective,randomized trial to compare
    therapy with deferiprone with deferoxamin.
  • 2) a prospective study to estimate the incidence
    of serious adverse effects of deferiprone in a
    large cohort of patients.

14
Toxicity of deferiprone
15
Combination Therapy deferiprone and
deferoxamine
  • Can provide additive effect
  • Two drug access different pools of iron
  • Deferoxamine
  • Form stable complex with NTBI
  • Deferipron
  • Chelating iron from tissue parenchyma and RE
    cells
  • Mobilized iron from transfferin, lactoferrin and
    hemosiderin

16
Deferasirox (ICL670)
  • A member of a new class of tridentate iron
    chelators, the N-substituted bis-hydroxyphenyl-tri
    azoles.
  • Orally bioavailable
  • Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) is between
    8 and 16 hours, allowing for once-daily
    administration.
  • Metabolism and elimination of deferasirox and the
    iron chelate (Fe-deferasirox2) is primarily by
    glucuronidation followed by hepatobiliary
    excretion into the feces.
  • No significant drug-drug interactions been
    identified to date.
  • Enter and remove iron from cells.

17
????
  • ??????????????????????

18
EBM Step Iask an answerable question
  • Patient thalassemia major
  • Intervention Deferoxamine (DFO)
  • Comparison oral iron chelations (Deferiprone,L1
    or Deferasirox, ICL670)
  • Outcome
  • Mortality
  • Evidence of reduced end-organ damage
  • Measures of iron overload
  • Adverse events or toxicity
  • Compliance

19
EBM Step IISearch the database
  • EBM Step IIICritical appraisal

20
Guideline
  • NGC (National Guideline Clearinghouse)
  • Iron chelation 5 results (1 selected)
  • Thalassemia 0
  • Iron overload 0

21
Diagnosis and Management of HemochromatosisANTHON
Y S. TAVILLHEPATOLOGY May 2001
  • In secondary iron overload associated with
    ineffective erythropoiesis, iron chelation
    therapy with parenteral deferoxamine is the
    treatment of choice.
  • Deferoxamine mesylate (Desferal) is the only
    approved iron chelation agent that is widely
    available.
  • Administered subcutaneously, using an implanted
    minipump, by continuous infusion over a 24-hour
    cycle at a dose of 20 to 40 mg/kg/d. A total dose
    of about 2 g per 24 hours usually achieves
    maximum urinary iron excretion.

22
Cochrane library
  • Key words iron overload ,iron chelating therapy
    , thalassemia
  • Systemic review 2 results (1 selected) 1
    protocal

Desferrioxamine mesylate for managing
transfusional ironoverload in people with
transfusion-dependent thalassaemia(Review)Robert
s DJ, Rees D, Howard J, Hyde C, Brunskill S19
October 2005 in Issue 4, 2005
Oral deferiprone for iron chelation in people
with thalassaemia (Protocol) Roberts D, Rees D,
Howard J, Williams S, Hyde C, Brunskill S
23
Desferrioxamine mesylate for managing
transfusional ironoverload in people with
transfusion-dependent thalassaemia(Review)Robert
s DJ, Rees D, Howard J, Hyde C, Brunskill S19
October 2005 in Issue 4, 2005
24
Objectives
  • To determine the effectiveness (dose and method
    of administration) of desferrioxamine in people
    with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

25
Selection criteria
  • Randomised controlled trials comparing
    desferrioxamine with placebo with another iron
    chelator or comparing two schedules of
    desferrioxamine, in people with
    transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

26
Description of studies
  • Three hundred and eighty five citations were
    identied from the searches, 31 from CENTRAL, 279
    from MEDLINE, 55 from EMBASE and 20 from ZETOC
  • Initial screening of the citations and trials for
    relevancy excluded 306 papers. The remaining 50
    papers represented 44 trials.
  • Eight trials reported in 14 publications were
    included in the review.

27
Types of intervention
  • DFO compared with placebo or no placebo
  • DFO compared with another iron chelating
    treatment schedule
  • DFO schedule A (either subcutaneous method of
    administration or dose A) compared with DFO
    schedule B (either intravenous method of
    administration or dose B).

28
Types of outcome measures
  • Primary outcome
  • (1) Mortality
  • Secondary outcomes
  • (1) Evidence of reduced end-organ damage
  • (2)Measures of iron overload (hepatic or
    non-invasive) - including
  • serum ferritin, assessment of liver and other
    tissue iron levels by
  • biopsy with biochemical measurement by SQUID
    (superconducting
  • quantum interference device) or by MRI (magnetic
    resonance
  • imaging).
  • (3) Adverse events or toxicity due to treatment
    with DFO, including
  • ocular damage, ototoxicity and non-endocrine
    growth failure
  • which is felt to be due to direct toxicity of DFO
    on vertebral height
  • growth.
  • (4) Participant compliance with DFO treatment
  • (5) Cost of DFO

29
Results-DFO COMPARED WITH ANOTHER IRON CHELATOR
Individual study data (mean /- standard
deviation) measures of iron overload
30
ResultsDFO COMPARED WITH ANOTHER IRON CHELATOR
31
Results-Serum ferritin concentration
No significant difference between DFO and DFP
32
Results-Serum ferritin concentration
33
Results-Urinary iron excretion
No significant difference between DFO and DFP
34
Results-Urinary iron excretion
No siginificant difference between DFO and
combined Tx.
35
Results-Liver iron concentration
13.7
Liver iron concentration baseline and end of
trial values
36
Results-Adverse events
37
Results-Participant compliance
  • DFO versus deferiprone (Olivieri 1997)
  • Compliance was significantly better in the
    control group (deferiprone) 94.9 /- 6.69 than
    that in the DFO treated group 71.6 /- 22.51 (P
    . 0.005).
  • DFO versus DFO and deferiprone (Mourad 2003)
  • Participant compliance with DFO was measured in
    this trial.
  • Compliance was rated as excellent in 11
    participants and good in three participants in
    the DFO group and as excellent in 10
    participants and good in one participant in the
    control (DFO with deferiprone) group.

38
Conclusion
  • The results from the included trials do not
    suggest that a change in practice is required.
  • The one trial comparing DFO with placebo
    demonstrated a benefit for those receiving DFO
    without the definite optimal schedule for DFO.
  • Future trials comparing DFO with deferiprone
    should
  • include outcomes for the long-term effectiveness
    and safety of these agents.
  • need to record full details of participant's
    baseline iron status and biochemical levels,
    previous iron chelation therapy and methods used
    to measure iron overload.

39
ACP Journal Club
  • Key words
  • iron overload 0
  • iron chelation 0
  • hemosiderosis 0
  • Deferiprone 0
  • DFO 1 (none selected)
  • Thalassemia 1 (none selected)

40
PubMed
  • PubMed (iron overload, iron chelation,
    thalassemia)
  • 313 (review 74)
  • Limits published in the last 10 years,
    Clinical Trial, Meta-Analysis, Practice
    Guideline, Randomized Controlled Trial
  • 24 (15 selected)

41
Updated Literature
  • Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
    with deferiprone and deferioxamine a 12-month
    trial.Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2006
    Jan-Feb36(1)21-5. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
  • Evaluation of ICL670, a once-daily oral iron
    chelator in a phase III clinical trial of
    beta-thalassemia patients with transfusional iron
    overload.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 20051054183-5.
  • A phase 3 study of deferasirox (ICL670), a
    once-daily oral iron chelator, in patients with
    -thalassemia Blood. 20061073455-3462

42
Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
with deferiprone anddeferioxamine A 12-month
trial
  • Patients
  • Fifty patients (29 females) with
    transfusion-dependent TM Their age ranged from 15
    to36 (mean 25.2 )years.
  • Either severe hemosiderosis defined by
    ferritingt2000 Ag/L (32 patients) and/or cardiac
    dysfunction defined by left ventricular
    shortening fraction (SF) lt29 (19 patients).

43
Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
with deferiprone anddeferioxamine A 12-month
trial
  • Study design
  • Fifty patients uniformly treated with DFP for 4
    days per week and combined therapy with DFP and
    DFO for 3 days of the week.
  • Efficacy was evaluated by ferritin and cardiac
    shortening fraction (SF).
  • Hepatic hemosiderosis was also assessed by
    estimation of the T2 relaxation time by magnetic
    resonance in a subgroup of patients.
  • Forty-three patients completed 1 year of therapy.

44
Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
with deferiprone anddeferioxamine A 12-month
trial
45
Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
with deferiprone anddeferioxamine A 12-month
trial
46
Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy
with deferiprone anddeferioxamine A 12-month
trial
  • Mean ferritin decreased from 3363.7 /- 2144.5
    Ag/L to2323.2 /- 1740.8 Ag/L ( P lt 0.0001).
  • Significant improvement in T2 relaxation and SF
    was observed.
  • The most common adverse events were
    gastrointestinal symptoms (20) and
    transaminasemia (18). The rate of
    agranulocytosis was 4.2 cases per 100
    patientyears.
  • Combined therapy may be related with a higher
    incidence of agranulocytosis, emphasizing the
    importance of careful monitoring.

47
Randomized phase II trial of deferasirox
(Exjade,ICL670), a once-daily,
orally-administered iron chelator,in comparison
to deferoxamine in thalassemia patientswith
transfusional iron overload
  • Background and Objectives
  • the tolerability and efficacy of deferasirox were
    compared with those of DFO in 71 adults with
    transfusional hemosiderosis.
  • Design and Methods
  • Patients were randomized to receive once-daily
    deferasirox (10 or 20 mg/kg n24 in both groups)
    or DFO (40 mg/kg, 5 days/week n23) for 48
    weeks.

48
Randomized phase II trial of deferasirox
(Exjade,ICL670), a once-daily,
orally-administered iron chelator,in comparison
to deferoxamine in thalassemia patientswith
transfusional iron overload
  • Results
  • Both treatments were well tolerated and no
    patient discontinued deferasirox due to
    drug-related adverse events.
  • Transient, mild to moderate gastrointestinal
    disturbances was higher in the deferasirox group
    than in the DFO group, settled spontaneously
    without dose interruption.
  • Decreases in liver iron concentration (LIC) were
    comparable in the deferasirox 20 mg/kg/day and
    DFO groups.

49
Randomized phase II trial of deferasirox
(Exjade,ICL670), a once-daily,
orally-administered iron chelator,in comparison
to deferoxamine in thalassemia patientswith
transfusional iron overload
  • Interpretation and Conclusions
  • Deferasirox at daily doses of 10 or 20 mg/kg was
    well tolerated.
  • 20 mg/kg, showed similar efficacy to DFO 40 mg/kg
    in terms of decreases in LIC.

50
A phase 3 study of deferasirox (ICL670), a
once-daily oral iron chelator, inpatients with
-thalassemia
  • Paitents
  • Between March and November 2003, 586 patients
    were randomized and started study treatment at 65
    centers in 12 countries (296 on deferasirox 290
    on deferoxamine).
  • Most patients completed 1 year of therapy on this
    study 541 (92.3) of 586 underwent both baseline
    and 1-year LIC assessments. Discontinuations were
    relatively similar in the groups receiving
    deferasirox (n 17) and deferoxamine (n12).

51
A phase 3 study of deferasirox (ICL670), a
once-daily oral iron chelator, inpatients with
-thalassemia
  • The primary response criterion
  • maintenance or reduction of LIC below 7mg Fe/g
    dw.
  • Secondary criteria
  • evaluation of the change in serum ferritin levels
    over time and evaluation of net body iron
    balance.

52
A phase 3 study of deferasirox (ICL670), a
once-daily oral iron chelator, inpatients with
-thalassemia
  • Results
  • In both arms, patients with LIC values gt 7 mg
    Fe/g dry weight (dw) had significant and similar
    dose-dependent reductions in LIC and serum
    ferritin, and effects on net body iron balance.
  • the primary endpoint was not met in the overall
    population, possibly due proportionally lower
    doses of deferasirox relative to deferoxamine for
    patients with LIC values less than 7 mg Fe/g dw.
  • The most common adverse events
  • rash, gastrointestinal disturbances, and mild
    nonprogressive increases in serum creatinine.
  • No agranulocytosis, arthropathy, or growth
    failure

53
EBM Step IV????
  • DFO ???? beta-thalassemia patients with
    transfusional iron overload ?????????
  • ????Deferiprone??chelation therapy
    ???????????DFO???
  • ????DFO?Deferiprone ???????DFO???,???????????
  • ?????iron chelator , ICL670, ??phase 2 ?phase 3
    study ???, ???????DFO??? ,?????????

54
Thanks for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com